22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Inferiorly based buccinator myomucosal island flap in oral and pharyngeal reconstruction. Four techniques to increase its application

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Graphical abstract

          Axial view of the cheek at the level of upper lip showing the layers included in the flap. Small part of orbicularis muscle, partial fibers of buccinator muscle, facial artery and vein are compositions of this flap. Buccopharyngeal fascia separates the buccal fat pad ( ) from the buccinator muscle.

          Highlights

          • We introduced a literature review on the inferiorly based buccinator myomucosal flap.

          • With four cases, all possible applications for this flap in oral and oropharyngeal reconstruction are explained.

          • Indications, limitations and considerations for this flap are explained.

          • Surgical technique, the ways for reducing donor site morbidity and who to increase pedicle length is demonstrated.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Reconstruction of oral and pharyngeal defects after pathologic resections with the same tissue is an optimal and ideal target. Islanded variety of inferiorly pedicled facial artery musculomucosal flap, in which facial artery and vein are skeletonized (referred to as inferiorly based BUMIF), is suitable for reconstruction of medium-sized mucosal defects.

          Presentation of cases

          In this article, with four cases, modifications of this flap are demonstrated in reconstruction of large intraoral and oropharyngeal defects and coverage of alveolar ridge in the mandible.

          Discussion

          In some situations, there is a need for more mucosal paddle, longer vascular pedicle and more adaptation to the recipient bed.

          Conclusion

          Relocating Stensen’s duct increases the mucosal paddle with cranial extension of superior limit while differential incision of the mucosa and buccinator muscle in mandibular vestibule extend the lower limit of this flap. Bone suture is a good complementary technique when this flap is used for coverage of mandibular alveolar ridge. Inferiorly based BUMIF with added length is indicated for oropharyngeal and contralateral mouth floor reconstructions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Myomucosal cheek flaps: applications in intraoral reconstruction using three different techniques.

          The use of myomucosal flaps harvested from the cheek area for intraoral reconstruction has been recently popularized in the literature. Several surgical techniques have been reported, and each study has described the outcomes and advantages of each method. However, the literature lacks a summary of the various surgical techniques utilizing buccinator myomucosal flaps. This paper examines the use of the 3 most important buccinator myomucosal flaps: the buccinator musculomucosal flap, the facial artery musculomucosal flap, and the buccinator musculomucosal island flap. We clarify the applications of each technique in intraoral reconstruction and discuss the indications for, and advantages and disadvantages of, each flap. Forty-six patients who underwent surgical resection for malignancies of the oral cavity and reconstructions with cheek flaps were retrospectively studied. All flaps were harvested and transposed. Complete loss of the flap occurred in only 1 case. In 2 cases, marginal necrosis of the flap took place, with complete spontaneous healing in 2 weeks. Buccinator musculomucosal flaps are a good option for reconstruction of moderately sized oral cavity defects. A key point in this procedure is flap selection based on not only the size and site of the defect, but also the patient's characteristics and type of surgical procedure.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cheek mucosa: a versatile donor site of myomucosal flaps. Technical and functional considerations.

            Reconstruction of moderate-sized mucosal defects of the oral cavity/oropharynx represents a surgical challenge. The most widely used reconstructive techniques are skin grafts, local or regional pedicled flaps, and free flaps, but they do not provide mucosal sensitivity, mobility, volume, or texture similar to that of native tissue. The cheek myomucosal flaps seem to provide "ideal reconstruction" because they carry a thin, mobile, well-vascularized, and sensitive tissue, like those excised or lost. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the indications for the advantages and disadvantages of 6 types of buccinator myomucosal flaps which are possible to raise from the cheek mucosa. Sixty-nine buccinator myomucosal flaps were performed on 66 patients with moderate-sized postoncologic and posttraumatic oral and oropharyngeal defects. In all cases except 1, flaps were successfully used with excellent oncological and functional results. Buccinator myomucosal flaps can be considered "ideal flaps" for three-dimensional oral and oropharyngeal reconstructions. Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Airway management of patients undergoing oral cancer surgery: a retrospective study.

              This retrospective study aims to describe the airway management and benefits of nasotracheal intubation over tracheostomy in 260 patients with oral cancer undergoing surgery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Surg Case Rep
                Int J Surg Case Rep
                International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
                Elsevier
                2210-2612
                10 July 2015
                2015
                10 July 2015
                : 14
                : 58-62
                Affiliations
                [a ]Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
                [b ]Dental Research Center, Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Dental Research Center of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences,Vakilabad Blvd, P.O. Box 91735-984, Mashhad, Iran. khajehahmadis@ 123456mums.ac.ir
                [1]

                Postal address: Oral and Maxillofacial Disease Research Center of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Vakilabad Blvd, Mashhad, Iran. Fax: +98 5138829500.

                Article
                S2210-2612(15)00286-2
                10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.06.025
                4573210
                26218177
                05812c6e-0431-47ba-901e-19fbc1972f61
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 17 February 2015
                : 20 June 2015
                : 26 June 2015
                Categories
                Case Series

                buccinator flap,facial artery,oral cavity reconstruction,oropharyngeal reconstruction

                Comments

                Comment on this article