40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The 2008 WHO classification of lymphomas: implications for clinical practice and translational research

      research-article
      1
      Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The 4 th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues published in 2008 builds upon the success of the 2001 3 rd edition; new entities are defined, and solutions for problematic categories are sought. Recent studies have drawn attention to the biological overlap between classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Similarly, there is a greater appreciation of the borderlands between Burkitt lymphoma and DLBCL. Strategies for the management of these borderline lesions are proposed. Additionally, age-specific and site-specific factors play an important role in the definition of several new entities, which also have biological underpinnings. Among the peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), more precise definitions were introduced for several entities, including anaplastic large cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, and subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma. Several new variants of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are proposed. Finally, the subclassification and categorization of the most common lymphoma subtypes, follicular lymphoma (FL) and DLBCL, were altered to enhance diagnostic accuracy and aid in clinical management. The 2008 WHO classification also draws attention to early events in lymphomagenesis. These lesions help delineate the earliest steps in neoplastic transformation and generally mandate a conservative therapeutic approach. The 2001 classification was rapidly adopted for clinical trials and successfully served as a common language for scientists comparing genetic and functional data. The modifications made in the 2008 classification are the result of this successful partnership among pathologists, clinicians, and biologists, but are only a stepping stone to the future.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          100890099
          26766
          Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program
          Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program
          Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program
          1520-4391
          1520-4383
          3 January 2019
          2009
          08 January 2019
          : 523-531
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Hematopathology Section, Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda, MD
          Author notes
          Correspondence Elaine S. Jaffe, MD, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; Phone: 301-496-0184; elainejaffe@ 123456nih.gov
          Article
          PMC6324557 PMC6324557 6324557 nihpa1004230
          10.1182/asheducation-2009.1.523
          6324557
          20008237
          04dbf421-f7d3-46f3-92e4-0ef499f2503e
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article