99
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Distinct Patterns of IFITM-Mediated Restriction of Filoviruses, SARS Coronavirus, and Influenza A Virus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Interferon-inducible transmembrane proteins 1, 2, and 3 (IFITM1, 2, and 3) are recently identified viral restriction factors that inhibit infection mediated by the influenza A virus (IAV) hemagglutinin (HA) protein. Here we show that IFITM proteins restricted infection mediated by the entry glycoproteins (GP 1,2) of Marburg and Ebola filoviruses (MARV, EBOV). Consistent with these observations, interferon-β specifically restricted filovirus and IAV entry processes. IFITM proteins also inhibited replication of infectious MARV and EBOV. We observed distinct patterns of IFITM-mediated restriction: compared with IAV, the entry processes of MARV and EBOV were less restricted by IFITM3, but more restricted by IFITM1. Moreover, murine Ifitm5 and 6 did not restrict IAV, but efficiently inhibited filovirus entry. We further demonstrate that replication of infectious SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and entry mediated by the SARS-CoV spike (S) protein are restricted by IFITM proteins. The profile of IFITM-mediated restriction of SARS-CoV was more similar to that of filoviruses than to IAV. Trypsin treatment of receptor-associated SARS-CoV pseudovirions, which bypasses their dependence on lysosomal cathepsin L, also bypassed IFITM-mediated restriction. However, IFITM proteins did not reduce cellular cathepsin activity or limit access of virions to acidic intracellular compartments. Our data indicate that IFITM-mediated restriction is localized to a late stage in the endocytic pathway. They further show that IFITM proteins differentially restrict the entry of a broad range of enveloped viruses, and modulate cellular tropism independently of viral receptor expression.

          Author Summary

          Cells express restriction factors, proteins whose primary activity is to inhibit viral replication. We have recently described a family of restriction factors, interferon-inducible transmembrane (IFITM) proteins, that interfere with replication of influenza A virus. The IFITM proteins uniquely inhibit replication early in the viral life-cycle, before the virus can successfully enter the cell cytoplasm. Here we show that the entry processes of several highly pathogenic viruses – Marburg virus, Ebola virus, and SARS coronavirus – are similarly disrupted by IFITM proteins. We compared IFITM-mediated restriction of these viruses with influenza A virus, and discovered that individual IFITM proteins are specialized for restriction. For example, we describe two mouse IFITM proteins that efficiently restrict entry of Marburg and Ebola viruses, but which do not inhibit influenza A virus. We further show that we can circumvent IFITM-mediated restriction by inducing a virus to enter a cell at or near the plasma membrane. This observation indicates that restriction is not a global property of the cell, but rather is localized to late endosomal and lysosomal compartments, the usual entry sites of IFITM-restricted viruses. This study therefore enhances our understanding of how the innate immune system controls influenza A virus and other pathogenic viruses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: the influenza hemagglutinin.

          Hemagglutinin (HA) is the receptor-binding and membrane fusion glycoprotein of influenza virus and the target for infectivity-neutralizing antibodies. The structures of three conformations of the ectodomain of the 1968 Hong Kong influenza virus HA have been determined by X-ray crystallography: the single-chain precursor, HA0; the metastable neutral-pH conformation found on virus, and the fusion pH-induced conformation. These structures provide a framework for designing and interpreting the results of experiments on the activity of HA in receptor binding, the generation of emerging and reemerging epidemics, and membrane fusion during viral entry. Structures of HA in complex with sialic acid receptor analogs, together with binding experiments, provide details of these low-affinity interactions in terms of the sialic acid substituents recognized and the HA residues involved in recognition. Neutralizing antibody-binding sites surround the receptor-binding pocket on the membrane-distal surface of HA, and the structures of the complexes between neutralizing monoclonal Fabs and HA indicate possible neutralization mechanisms. Cleavage of the biosynthetic precursor HA0 at a prominent loop in its structure primes HA for subsequent activation of membrane fusion at endosomal pH (Figure 1). Priming involves insertion of the fusion peptide into a charged pocket in the precursor; activation requires its extrusion towards the fusion target membrane, as the N terminus of a newly formed trimeric coiled coil, and repositioning of the C-terminal membrane anchor near the fusion peptide at the same end of a rod-shaped molecule. Comparison of this new HA conformation, which has been formed for membrane fusion, with the structures determined for other virus fusion glycoproteins suggests that these molecules are all in the fusion-activated conformation and that the juxtaposition of the membrane anchor and fusion peptide, a recurring feature, is involved in the fusion mechanism. Extension of these comparisons to the soluble N-ethyl-maleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) protein complex of vesicle fusion allows a similar conclusion.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            HIV enters cells via endocytosis and dynamin-dependent fusion with endosomes.

            Enveloped viruses that rely on a low pH-dependent step for entry initiate infection by fusing with acidic endosomes, whereas the entry sites for pH-independent viruses, such as HIV-1, have not been defined. These viruses have long been assumed to fuse directly with the plasma membrane. Here we used population-based measurements of the viral content delivery into the cytosol and time-resolved imaging of single viruses to demonstrate that complete HIV-1 fusion occurred in endosomes. In contrast, viral fusion with the plasma membrane did not progress beyond the lipid mixing step. HIV-1 underwent receptor-mediated internalization long before endosomal fusion, thus minimizing the surface exposure of conserved viral epitopes during fusion and reducing the efficacy of inhibitors targeting these epitopes. We also show that, strikingly, endosomal fusion is sensitive to a dynamin inhibitor, dynasore. These findings imply that HIV-1 infects cells via endocytosis and envelope glycoprotein- and dynamin-dependent fusion with intracellular compartments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              SARS Coronavirus, but Not Human Coronavirus NL63, Utilizes Cathepsin L to Infect ACE2-expressing Cells *

              Viruses require specific cellular receptors to infect their target cells. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a cellular receptor for two divergent coronaviruses, SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and human coronavirus NL63 (HCoV-NL63). In addition to hostcell receptors, lysosomal cysteine proteases are required for productive infection by some viruses. Here we show that SARS-CoV, but not HCoV-NL63, utilizes the enzymatic activity of the cysteine protease cathepsin L to infect ACE2-expressing cells. Inhibitors of cathepsin L blocked infection by SARS-CoV and by a retrovirus pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV spike (S) protein but not infection by HCoV-NL63 or a retrovirus pseudotyped with the HCoV-NL63 S protein. Expression of exogenous cathepsin L substantially enhanced infection mediated by the SARS-CoV S protein and by filovirus GP proteins but not by the HCoV-NL63 S protein or the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein. Finally, an inhibitor of endosomal acidification had substantially less effect on infection mediated by the HCoV-NL63 S protein than on that mediated by the SARS-CoV S protein. Our data indicate that two coronaviruses that utilize a common receptor nonetheless enter cells through distinct mechanisms.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Pathog
                plos
                plospath
                PLoS Pathogens
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1553-7366
                1553-7374
                January 2011
                January 2011
                6 January 2011
                : 7
                : 1
                : e1001258
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, New England Primate Research Center, Southborough, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [2 ]US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Disease, National Interagency Biodefense Campus, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
                [3 ]Departments of Pediatrics and Microbiology and Immunology and Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
                [4 ]Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [5 ]Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [6 ]Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, National Interagency Biodefense Campus, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America
                [7 ]Tunnell Consulting Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
                [8 ]Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: ICH CCB SRR MMB MRD MF. Performed the experiments: ICH CCB JLW MMB JJC AAA XC LD LEL DB. Analyzed the data: ICH CCB SRR MMB JHK SB MRD HC MF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SRR ALB SJE SB. Wrote the paper: ICH MF.

                Article
                10-PLPA-RA-3212R2
                10.1371/journal.ppat.1001258
                3017121
                21253575
                02f064e1-c3ef-45ce-b6fa-fe33f2dc241a
                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
                History
                : 27 April 2010
                : 14 December 2010
                Page count
                Pages: 13
                Categories
                Research Article
                Virology/Host Antiviral Responses
                Virology/Host Invasion and Cell Entry

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article