2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Metabolic Efficacy of Time-Restricted Eating in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

      , , ,
      The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
      The Endocrine Society

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context

          Time-restricted eating (TRE), which restricts food intake to a limited duration of the day, is a key regimen of intermittent fasting.

          Objective

          The aim of our study was to provide an up-to-date meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of TRE on weight loss and other metabolic-related parameters in adults.

          Methods

          We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published before February 26, 2022. Study duration of TRE was at least 4 weeks. Body weight and other metabolic-related continuous parameters were described as weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI.

          Results

          Seventeen randomized controlled trials involving 899 participants were analyzed. The pooled meta-analysis has shown that TRE contributed to a significant decrease in body weight with a WMD of −1.60 kg (95% CI −2.27 to −0.93) and fat mass with WMD −1.48 kg (95% CI −1.59 to −1.38). Subgroup analysis showed that TRE could reduce body weight and fat mass especially in overweight participants with WMD −1.43 kg (95% CI −2.05 to −0.81) and −1.56 kg (95% CI −1.67 to −1.44), respectively. TRE also showed beneficial effects on the lipid spectrum in overweight participants, including decreased levels of triglyceride (WMD −12.71 mg/dL, 95% CI −24.9 to −0.52), total cholesterol (WMD −6.45 mg/dL, 95% CI −7.40 to −5.49), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD −7.0 mg/dL, 95% CI −9.74 to −4.25). However, compared with control, TRE had no significant effects on waist circumference, body mass index, glycosylated hemoglobin, or blood pressure.

          Conclusion

          This updated meta-analysis found that TRE may be an effective approach to improve the metabolic state of nonobese subjects, especially in overweight participants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
                The Endocrine Society
                0021-972X
                1945-7197
                December 01 2022
                November 25 2022
                October 03 2022
                December 01 2022
                November 25 2022
                October 03 2022
                : 107
                : 12
                : 3428-3441
                Article
                10.1210/clinem/dgac570
                36190980
                0281123c-7122-4646-8d93-f7da10f0826e
                © 2022

                https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article