60
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Molecular Findings Among Patients Referred for Clinical Whole-Exome Sequencing

      1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 1 , 5 , 1 , 6 , 3 , 7 , 1
      JAMA
      American Medical Association (AMA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Clinical whole-exome sequencing is increasingly used for diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected genetic disorders. To perform clinical whole-exome sequencing and report (1) the rate of molecular diagnosis among phenotypic groups, (2) the spectrum of genetic alterations contributing to disease, and (3) the prevalence of medically actionable incidental findings such as FBN1 mutations causing Marfan syndrome. Observational study of 2000 consecutive patients with clinical whole-exome sequencing analyzed between June 2012 and August 2014. Whole-exome sequencing tests were performed at a clinical genetics laboratory in the United States. Results were reported by clinical molecular geneticists certified by the American Board of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Tests were ordered by the patient's physician. The patients were primarily pediatric (1756 [88%]; mean age, 6 years; 888 females [44%], 1101 males [55%], and 11 fetuses [1% gender unknown]), demonstrating diverse clinical manifestations most often including nervous system dysfunction such as developmental delay. Whole-exome sequencing diagnosis rate overall and by phenotypic category, mode of inheritance, spectrum of genetic events, and reporting of incidental findings. A molecular diagnosis was reported for 504 patients (25.2%) with 58% of the diagnostic mutations not previously reported. Molecular diagnosis rates for each phenotypic category were 143/526 (27.2%; 95% CI, 23.5%-31.2%) for the neurological group, 282/1147 (24.6%; 95% CI, 22.1%-27.2%) for the neurological plus other organ systems group, 30/83 (36.1%; 95% CI, 26.1%-47.5%) for the specific neurological group, and 49/244 (20.1%; 95% CI, 15.6%-25.8%) for the nonneurological group. The Mendelian disease patterns of the 527 molecular diagnoses included 280 (53.1%) autosomal dominant, 181 (34.3%) autosomal recessive (including 5 with uniparental disomy), 65 (12.3%) X-linked, and 1 (0.2%) mitochondrial. Of 504 patients with a molecular diagnosis, 23 (4.6%) had blended phenotypes resulting from 2 single gene defects. About 30% of the positive cases harbored mutations in disease genes reported since 2011. There were 95 medically actionable incidental findings in genes unrelated to the phenotype but with immediate implications for management in 92 patients (4.6%), including 59 patients (3%) with mutations in genes recommended for reporting by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Whole-exome sequencing provided a potential molecular diagnosis for 25% of a large cohort of patients referred for evaluation of suspected genetic conditions, including detection of rare genetic events and new mutations contributing to disease. The yield of whole-exome sequencing may offer advantages over traditional molecular diagnostic approaches in certain patients.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA
          JAMA
          American Medical Association (AMA)
          0098-7484
          November 12 2014
          November 12 2014
          : 312
          : 18
          : 1870
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
          [2 ]Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
          [3 ]Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas3Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
          [4 ]Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
          [5 ]Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas4Human Genetics Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
          [6 ]Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas2Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas3Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
          [7 ]Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas2Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
          Article
          10.1001/jama.2014.14601
          4326249
          25326635
          025a7eef-82ea-4796-b2d2-5bccb55bf43f
          © 2014
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article