3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The objective of the study was to compare the effects of long-term and short-term embryo culture to assess whether there is a correlation between culture duration and clinical outcomes.

          Methods

          Embryos were divided into two study groups depending on whether their post-warming culture period was long-term (20–24 hours) or short-term (2–4 hours). Embryo morphology was analyzed with a time-lapse monitoring device to estimate the appropriate timing and parameters for evaluating embryos with high implantation potency in both groups. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust the confounding factors across groups. The grades of embryos and blastocoels, morphokinetic parameters, implantation rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate were compared.

          Results

          No significant differences were observed in the implantation rate or ongoing pregnancy rate between the two groups (long-term culture group vs. short-term culture group: 56.3% vs. 67.9%, p=0.182; 47.3% vs. 53.6%, p=0.513). After warming, there were more expanded and hatching/hatched blastocysts in the long-term culture group than in the short-term culture group, but there was no significant between-group difference in embryo grade. Regarding pregnancy outcomes, the time to complete blastocyst re-expansion after warming is shorter in women who became pregnant than in those who did not in both culture groups (long-term: 2.19±0.63 vs. 4.11±0.81 hours, p=0.003; short-term: 1.17±0.29 vs. 1.94±0.76 hours, p=0.018, respectively).

          Conclusion

          The outcomes of short-term culture and long-term culture were not significantly different in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. Regardless of the post-warming culture time, the degree of blastocyst re-expansion 3–4 hours after warming is an important marker for embryo selection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prediction of live birth in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles by pre-freeze and post-thaw morphology.

          What pre-freeze and post-thaw morphological parameters can be used to predict live birth outcomes after frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles?
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Blastocoele expansion degree predicts live birth after single blastocyst transfer for fresh and vitrified/warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles

            To evaluate the independent effects of the degree of blastocoele expansion and re-expansion and the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) grades on predicting live birth after fresh and vitrified/warmed single blastocyst transfer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Analysis of the morphological dynamics of blastocysts after vitrification/warming: defining new predictive variables of implantation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Exp Reprod Med
                Clin Exp Reprod Med
                CERM
                Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
                Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine
                2233-8233
                2233-8241
                December 2020
                10 November 2020
                : 47
                : 4
                : 312-318
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea
                [2 ]Department of Biomedical Science, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Sang Woo Lyu Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, )569 Nonhyun-ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul 06125, Korea Tel: +82-2-3468-3401, Fax: +82-2-3468-2842, E-mail: dung5038@ 123456cha.ac.kr
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this article.

                [**]

                This research was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (or Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program, 20003838) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MI, Korea).

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6895-7368
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5333-4990
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2874-8884
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7875-1870
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-7310
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5156-0751
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7819-383X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2564-6292
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2329-1774
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5572-0898
                Article
                cerm-2020-03832
                10.5653/cerm.2020.03832
                7711098
                33181011
                013aebb9-5d46-4ca4-826c-9f0ccc924392
                Copyright © 2020. THE KOREAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 May 2020
                : 1 August 2020
                : 8 August 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                blsatocyst,clinical outcomes,post-warming culture duration,vitrification

                Comments

                Comment on this article