2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Combined Assessment of Preoperative Frailty and Sarcopenia Allows the Prediction of Overall Survival in Patients with Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Surgically Treated Brain Metastasis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Patients with brain metastasis are at a severe stage of cancer, and brain surgery can prevent neurological morbidity. However, the success of brain surgery might require a patient’s physical integrity prior to the operation. In the present study, we asked whether a preoperative physical decline affects survival in patients with brain metastasis from lung cancer. In order to measure the physical condition, we used a commonly-known index—the so-called frailty index—and additionally measured the thickness of a particular masticatory muscle as muscle loss correlates to physical decline. We found that a decreased muscle thickness was accompanied by worsened survival for patients < 65 years and an increased frailty index correlated to worsened survival for patients ≥ 65 years. These results encourage to use of the frailty index and muscle thickness as easily available parameters in order to more sufficiently estimate individual treatment success in patients with metastatic lung cancer.

          Abstract

          Neurosurgical resection represents an important therapeutic pillar in patients with brain metastasis (BM). Such extended treatment modalities require preoperative assessment of patients’ physical status to estimate individual treatment success. The aim of the present study was to analyze the predictive value of frailty and sarcopenia as assessment tools for physiological integrity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had undergone surgery for BM. Between 2013 and 2018, 141 patients were surgically treated for BM from NSCLC at the authors’ institution. The preoperative physical condition was assessed by the temporal muscle thickness (TMT) as a surrogate parameter for sarcopenia and the modified frailty index (mFI). For the ≥65 aged group, median overall survival (mOS) significantly differed between patients classified as ‘frail’ (mFI ≥ 0.27) and ‘least and moderately frail’ (mFI < 0.27) (15 months versus 11 months ( p = 0.02)). Sarcopenia revealed significant differences in mOS for the <65 aged group (10 versus 18 months for patients with and without sarcopenia ( p = 0.036)). The present study confirms a predictive value of preoperative frailty and sarcopenia with respect to OS in patients with NSCLC and surgically treated BM. A combined assessment of mFI and TMT allows the prediction of OS across all age groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis

          Abstract Background in 2010, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) published a sarcopenia definition that aimed to foster advances in identifying and caring for people with sarcopenia. In early 2018, the Working Group met again (EWGSOP2) to update the original definition in order to reflect scientific and clinical evidence that has built over the last decade. This paper presents our updated findings. Objectives to increase consistency of research design, clinical diagnoses and ultimately, care for people with sarcopenia. Recommendations sarcopenia is a muscle disease (muscle failure) rooted in adverse muscle changes that accrue across a lifetime; sarcopenia is common among adults of older age but can also occur earlier in life. In this updated consensus paper on sarcopenia, EWGSOP2: (1) focuses on low muscle strength as a key characteristic of sarcopenia, uses detection of low muscle quantity and quality to confirm the sarcopenia diagnosis, and identifies poor physical performance as indicative of severe sarcopenia; (2) updates the clinical algorithm that can be used for sarcopenia case-finding, diagnosis and confirmation, and severity determination and (3) provides clear cut-off points for measurements of variables that identify and characterise sarcopenia. Conclusions EWGSOP2's updated recommendations aim to increase awareness of sarcopenia and its risk. With these new recommendations, EWGSOP2 calls for healthcare professionals who treat patients at risk for sarcopenia to take actions that will promote early detection and treatment. We also encourage more research in the field of sarcopenia in order to prevent or delay adverse health outcomes that incur a heavy burden for patients and healthcare systems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people.

            There is no single generally accepted clinical definition of frailty. Previously developed tools to assess frailty that have been shown to be predictive of death or need for entry into an institutional facility have not gained acceptance among practising clinicians. We aimed to develop a tool that would be both predictive and easy to use. We developed the 7-point Clinical Frailty Scale and applied it and other established tools that measure frailty to 2305 elderly patients who participated in the second stage of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA). We followed this cohort prospectively; after 5 years, we determined the ability of the Clinical Frailty Scale to predict death or need for institutional care, and correlated the results with those obtained from other established tools. The CSHA Clinical Frailty Scale was highly correlated (r = 0.80) with the Frailty Index. Each 1-category increment of our scale significantly increased the medium-term risks of death (21.2% within about 70 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.5%-30.6%) and entry into an institution (23.9%, 95% CI 8.8%-41.2%) in multivariable models that adjusted for age, sex and education. Analyses of receiver operating characteristic curves showed that our Clinical Frailty Scale performed better than measures of cognition, function or comorbidity in assessing risk for death (area under the curve 0.77 for 18-month and 0.70 for 70-month mortality). Frailty is a valid and clinically important construct that is recognizable by physicians. Clinical judgments about frailty can yield useful predictive information.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus.

              To develop a framework for the definition and classification of cancer cachexia a panel of experts participated in a formal consensus process, including focus groups and two Delphi rounds. Cancer cachexia was defined as a multifactorial syndrome defined by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass (with or without loss of fat mass) that cannot be fully reversed by conventional nutritional support and leads to progressive functional impairment. Its pathophysiology is characterised by a negative protein and energy balance driven by a variable combination of reduced food intake and abnormal metabolism. The agreed diagnostic criterion for cachexia was weight loss greater than 5%, or weight loss greater than 2% in individuals already showing depletion according to current bodyweight and height (body-mass index [BMI] <20 kg/m(2)) or skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia). An agreement was made that the cachexia syndrome can develop progressively through various stages--precachexia to cachexia to refractory cachexia. Severity can be classified according to degree of depletion of energy stores and body protein (BMI) in combination with degree of ongoing weight loss. Assessment for classification and clinical management should include the following domains: anorexia or reduced food intake, catabolic drive, muscle mass and strength, functional and psychosocial impairment. Consensus exists on a framework for the definition and classification of cancer cachexia. After validation, this should aid clinical trial design, development of practice guidelines, and, eventually, routine clinical management. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                03 July 2021
                July 2021
                : 13
                : 13
                : 3353
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; muriel.heimann@ 123456ukbonn.de (M.H.); anna-laura.potthoff@ 123456ukbonn.de (A.-L.P.); Valeri.Borger@ 123456ukbonn.de (V.B.); erdem.gueresir@ 123456ukbonn.de (E.G.); Hartmut.Vatter@ 123456ukbonn.de (H.V.); patrick.schuss@ 123456ukbonn.de (P.S.); matthias.schneider@ 123456ukbonn.de (M.S.)
                [2 ]Department of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; anton.faron@ 123456ukbonn.de
                [3 ]Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; niklas.schaefer@ 123456ukbonn.de (N.S.); Ulrich.Herrlinger@ 123456ukbonn.de (U.H.)
                [4 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; Christian.Bode@ 123456ukbonn.de (C.B.); lars.eichhorn@ 123456ukbonn.de (L.E.); Felix.Lehmann@ 123456ukbonn.de (F.L.)
                [5 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; frank.giordano@ 123456ukbonn.de
                [6 ]Department of Geriatric Medicine and Neurology, Johanniter Hospital Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany; ahjacobs@ 123456uni-muenster.de
                [7 ]Department of Oncology and Hematology, Johanniter Hospital Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany; yon-dschun.ko@ 123456bn.johanniter-kliniken.de
                [8 ]Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; Jennifer.Landsberg@ 123456ukbonn.de
                [9 ]Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; Alexander.Radbruch@ 123456ukbonn.de
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: inja.ilic@ 123456ukbonn.de ; Tel.: +49-228-287-16500
                [†]

                Shared first authorship.

                [‡]

                Shared last authorship.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0830-870X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5905-4121
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9769-0639
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8319-0847
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2847-9271
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5806-2576
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6025-7479
                Article
                cancers-13-03353
                10.3390/cancers13133353
                8267959
                34283079
                01179c6e-10bd-46f1-8c41-d5f834bedc75
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 06 June 2021
                : 01 July 2021
                Categories
                Article

                brain metastases,non-small cell lung cancer,sarcopenia,frailty,overall survival,outcome

                Comments

                Comment on this article