1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Lung-MAP S1800D: A phase II/III study of N-803 (ALT-803) plus pembrolizumab versus standard of care in participants with stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          2619

          Background: IL-15 is a member of the IL-2 common gamma chain family of cytokines. N-803 is IL-15 administered in complex with IL-15 receptor alpha. Lung cancer, despite advances in targeted therapies and immunotherapy, remains the leading cause of cancer related death in the United States. Strategies to improve the performance of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC is a clinical unmet need. Methods: Lung-MAP S1800D was a randomized study comparing N-803 plus pembrolizumab (NP) to investigators’ choice standard-of-care chemotherapy (SoC) for previously treated advanced NSCLC. Patients were enrolled into an Acquired Resistance Cohort (ARC) if disease progression on prior anti-PD-(L)1 occurred > 84 days from start of treatment and otherwise into a Primary Resistance Cohort (PRC). The ARC was a phase II/III study with a sample size goal of 334 patients. The PRC was a phase II with sample size of 134 patients. The first interim analysis (IA1) in the ARC evaluated futility among the first 25 patients treated with NP which required ≥1 response and ≥50% with disease control at 12 weeks to continue accrual. The primary endpoint in both cohorts was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response, and toxicity. Results: Accrual in the ARC and PRC were closed at the IA1 in the ARC with 74 pts in the ARC and 8 in the PRC. Of the 74 ARC patients, 71 met eligibility (36 SoC, 35 NP), and 32 pts on each arm received treatment. With 44 events, OS was not significantly different between the two arms (HR (95%CI: 0.73(0.40-1.36), p=0.32) with a 12-month OS rate of 25% with SoC and 44% with NP. With 61 events, PFS was not significantly different but numerically worse (HR (95% CI): 1.29 (0.78-2.13, 95% CI), p=0.33). There were 3 unconfirmed partial responses and 1 confirmed complete response with NP and 3 unconfirmed partial responses and 2 confirmed partial responses with SoC. On the NP arm, there were 10 Grade 3 (1 hematologic) and 1 Grade 5 treatment-related adverse events reported as Disease Progression (34% Grade 3+ TRAE). The Grade 3+ TRAE rate on the SoC arm was 53% with 10 Grade 3+ hematologic toxicities. Conclusions: While the study failed to continue accrual past IA1, there is an indication of a subgroup that might benefit from NP with a potential OS difference at 12 months. NP was safe when compared to SoC, and responses were seen in both treatment arms, including partial and complete responses in the NP group. Evaluation of tumor and patient characteristics will be critical to define if there are those who may benefit from N-803 plus pembrolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT05096663 .

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          June 01 2024
          June 01 2024
          : 42
          : 16_suppl
          : 2619
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
          [2 ]Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
          [3 ]UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA
          [4 ]Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
          [5 ]Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
          [6 ]Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
          [7 ]Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA
          [8 ]Missouri Baptist Medical Center, Saint Loius, MO
          [9 ]SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
          [10 ]UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
          [11 ]Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
          [12 ]H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.2619
          0076a928-a859-4e4b-9b66-6ecaca31ab36
          © 2024
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article