14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Mediating Role of Psychological Need Thwarting in the Relationship Between Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Psychological Withdrawal

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study examined a novel process underlying the relationship between compulsory citizenship behavior and psychological withdrawal. Specifically, based on basic psychological needs theory, thwarting of autonomy and relatedness needs were expected to explain the association between compulsory citizenship behavior and psychological withdrawal. The PROCESS macro was used to analyze the data collected from 368 clerical staff working in public universities in Pakistan. The results confirmed that thwarting of autonomy and relatedness need mediated the relationship between compulsory citizenship behavior and psychological withdrawal. This study makes a significant contribution to the unexplored domain of the process employees use to cope with compulsory citizenship behavior. It also highlights the role of an understudied construct, i.e., psychological need thwarting as a crucial motivational mechanism for elucidating the relationship between compulsory citizenship behavior and psychological withdrawal. The findings of this study provide recommendations for future researchers, along with its implications for practitioners.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs.

          Three studies compared 10 candidate psychological needs in an attempt to determine which are truly most fundamental for humans. Participants described "most satisfying events" within their lives and then rated the salience of each of the 10 candidate needs within these events. Supporting self-determination theory postulates (Ryan & Deci, 2000)--autonomy, competence, and relatedness, were consistently among the top 4 needs, in terms of both their salience and their association with event-related affect. Self-esteem was also important, whereas self-actualization or meaning, physical thriving, popularity or influence, and money-luxury were less important. This basic pattern emerged within three different time frames and within both U.S. and South Korean samples and also within a final study that asked, "What's unsatisfying about unsatisfying events?" Implications for hierarchical theories of needs are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                26 November 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 2595
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Lyallpur Business School, Government College University Faisalabad , Faisalabad, Pakistan
                [2] 2Department of Business Administration, Government College Women University Faisalabad , Faisalabad, Pakistan
                [3] 3College of Business, Ohio University , Athens, OH, United States
                [4] 4School of Public Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law , Wuhan, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jon Gruda, Maynooth University, Ireland

                Reviewed by: Jim Allen McCleskey, Western Governors University, United States; María del Mar Molero, University of Almería, Spain

                *Correspondence: Sharjeel Saleem, sharjilsaleem@ 123456gmail.com

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02595
                6888699
                b5d8da70-349c-4e12-b1dd-c5c365f7bfc9
                Copyright © 2019 Bashir, Shaheen, Saleem, Bhutta, Abrar and Jun.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 September 2019
                : 31 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 76, Pages: 11, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                compulsory citizenship behavior,autonomy need thwarting,relatedness need thwarting,psychological withdrawal,basic psychological needs theory

                Comments

                Comment on this article