16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Social Worker–Aided Palliative Care Intervention in High-risk Patients With Heart Failure (SWAP-HF) : A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

      brief-report
      , MPH, MSW, LICSW 1 , , MD 2 , , MD 3 , , MSW, LICSW 4 , , MSW, LICSW 4 , , MD 5 , , MD, MPH 5 ,
      JAMA Cardiology
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This randomized clinical trial investigates if early initiation of care goals conversations by a palliative care–trained social worker would improve prognostic understanding, elicit advanced care preferences, and influence care plans for high-risk patients discharged after hospitalization for heart failure.

          Key Points

          Question

          Can routine initiation of goals of care discussions by a palliative care social worker bridging inpatient to outpatient care facilitate greater patient-physician engagement around palliative care considerations in high-risk patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure?

          Findings

          In this randomized clinical trial, compared with usual care, patients allocated to the social worker–led intervention were more likely to have physician-level documentation of care preferences in the electronic health record and to have prognostic expectations aligned with their physicians without worsening of depression, anxiety, or quality-of-life scores.

          Meaning

          Training and empowering social workers to initiate goals of care conversations for individuals in inpatient care transitioning to outpatient care may improve the overall quality of care for patients with advanced heart failure.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Palliative care considerations are typically introduced late in the disease trajectory of patients with advanced heart failure (HF), and access to specialty-level palliative care may be limited.

          Objective

          To determine if early initiation of goals of care conversations by a palliative care–trained social worker would improve prognostic understanding, elicit advanced care preferences, and influence care plans for high-risk patients discharged after HF hospitalization.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This prospective, randomized clinical trial of a social worker–led palliative care intervention vs usual care analyzed patients recently hospitalized for management of acute HF who had risk factors for poor prognosis. Analyses were conducted by intention to treat.

          Interventions

          Key components of the social worker–led intervention included a structured evaluation of prognostic understanding, end-of-life preferences, symptom burden, and quality of life with routine review by a palliative care physician; communication of this information to treating clinicians; and longitudinal follow-up in the ambulatory setting.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Percentage of patients with physician-level documentation of advanced care preferences and the degree of alignment between patient and cardiologist expectations of prognosis at 6 months.

          Results

          The study population (N = 50) had a mean (SD) age of 72 (11) years and had a mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.33 (13). Of 50 patients, 41 (82%) had been hospitalized more than once for HF management within 12 months of enrollment. At enrollment, treating physicians anticipated death within a year for 32 patients (64%), but 42 patients (84%) predicted their life expectancy to be longer than 5 years. At 6 months, more patients in the intervention group than in the control group had physician-level documentation of advanced care preferences in the electronic health record (17 [65%] vs 8 [33%]; χ 2 = 5.1; P = .02). Surviving patients allocated to intervention were also more likely to revise their baseline prognostic assessment in a direction consistent with the physician’s assessment (15 [94%] vs 4 [26%]; χ 2 = 14.7; P < .001). Among the 31 survivors at 6 months, there was no measured difference between groups in depression, anxiety, or quality-of-life scores.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Patients at high risk for mortality from HF frequently overestimate their life expectancy. Without an adverse impact on quality of life, prognostic understanding and patient-physician communication regarding goals of care may be enhanced by a focused, social worker–led palliative care intervention that begins in the hospital and continues in the outpatient setting.

          Trial Registration

          clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02805712.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Advanced (stage D) heart failure: a statement from the Heart Failure Society of America Guidelines Committee.

          We propose that stage D advanced heart failure be defined as the presence of progressive and/or persistent severe signs and symptoms of heart failure despite optimized medical, surgical, and device therapy. Importantly, the progressive decline should be primarily driven by the heart failure syndrome. Formally defining advanced heart failure and specifying when medical and device therapies have failed is challenging, but signs and symptoms, hemodynamics, exercise testing, biomarkers, and risk prediction models are useful in this process. Identification of patients in stage D is a clinically important task because treatments are inherently limited, morbidity is typically progressive, and survival is often short. Age, frailty, and psychosocial issues affect both outcomes and selection of therapy for stage D patients. Heart transplant and mechanical circulatory support devices are potential treatment options in select patients. In addition to considering indications, contraindications, clinical status, and comorbidities, treatment selection for stage D patients involves incorporating the patient's wishes for survival versus quality of life, and palliative and hospice care should be integrated into care plans. More research is needed to determine optimal strategies for patient selection and medical decision making, with the ultimate goal of improving clinical and patient centered outcomes in patients with stage D heart failure.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Palliative care referral among patients hospitalized with advanced heart failure.

            Many heart failure (HF) patients experience high symptom burden, but palliative care (PC) services have been used infrequently in this population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Discharge Hospice Referral and Lower 30-Day All-Cause Readmission in Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized for Heart FailureCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

              Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause for hospital readmission. Hospice care may help palliate HF symptoms but its association with 30-day all-cause readmission remains unknown.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Cardiol
                JAMA Cardiol
                JAMA Cardiol
                JAMA Cardiology
                American Medical Association
                2380-6583
                2380-6591
                11 April 2018
                June 2018
                11 April 2019
                : 3
                : 6
                : 516-519
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Boston University School of Social Work, Boston, Massachusetts
                [2 ]Palliative Medicine Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [3 ]Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [4 ]Department of Social Work, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [5 ]Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Corresponding Author: Akshay S. Desai, MD, MPH, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 ( adesai@ 123456bwh.harvard.edu ).
                Accepted for Publication: February 16, 2018.
                Published Online: April 11, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0589
                Author Contributions: Dr Desai had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Study concept and design: O’Donnell, Schaefer, Stevenson, Mehra, Desai.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: O’Donnell, Schaefer, Stevenson, DeVoe, Walsh, Desai.
                Drafting of the manuscript: O’Donnell, Stevenson, Mehra, Desai.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: O’Donnell, Schaefer, Stevenson, DeVoe, Walsh, Desai.
                Statistical analysis: O’Donnell, Walsh, Desai.
                Obtained funding: Mehra, Desai.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: O’Donnell, Schaefer, Walsh, Mehra, Desai.
                Study supervision: Schaefer, Stevenson, Desai.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by a Watkins Discovery Award from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, made possible through a philanthropic gift from the E. G. Watkins Family Foundation.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                PMC6128511 PMC6128511 6128511 hbr180003
                10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0589
                6128511
                29641819
                13943ec0-9185-498d-8c9a-d21d189bdd81
                Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
                History
                : 18 November 2017
                : 16 February 2018
                : 16 February 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: E. G. Watkins Family Foundation
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Brief Report
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article