24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence-based guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease since 1999. This guideline is on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes and updates the 2015 IWGDF infection guideline. On the basis of patient, intervention, comparison, outcomes (PICOs) developed by the infection committee, in conjunction with internal and external reviewers and consultants, and on systematic reviews the committee conducted on the diagnosis of infection (new) and treatment of infection (updated from 2015), we offer 27 recommendations. These cover various aspects of diagnosing soft tissue and bone infection, including the classification scheme for diagnosing infection and its severity. Of note, we have updated this scheme for the first time since we developed it 15 years ago. We also review the microbiology of diabetic foot infections, including how to collect samples and to process them to identify causative pathogens. Finally, we discuss the approach to treating diabetic foot infections, including selecting appropriate empiric and definitive antimicrobial therapy for soft tissue and for bone infections, when and how to approach surgical treatment, and which adjunctive treatments we think are or are not useful for the infectious aspects of diabetic foot problems. For this version of the guideline, we also updated four tables and one figure from the 2016 guideline. We think that following the principles of diagnosing and treating diabetic foot infections outlined in this guideline can help clinicians to provide better care for these patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references190

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

          Definitions of sepsis and septic shock were last revised in 2001. Considerable advances have since been made into the pathobiology (changes in organ function, morphology, cell biology, biochemistry, immunology, and circulation), management, and epidemiology of sepsis, suggesting the need for reexamination.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics.

              Surface-associated microbial communities, called biofilms, are present in all environments. Although biofilms play an important positive role in a variety of ecosystems, they also have many negative effects, including biofilm-related infections in medical settings. The ability of pathogenic biofilms to survive in the presence of high concentrations of antibiotics is called "recalcitrance" and is a characteristic property of the biofilm lifestyle, leading to treatment failure and infection recurrence. This review presents our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of biofilm recalcitrance toward antibiotics and describes how recent progress has improved our capacity to design original and efficient strategies to prevent or eradicate biofilm-related infections.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev.
                Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews
                Wiley
                1520-7560
                1520-7552
                March 2020
                : 36 Suppl 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
                [2 ] Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
                [3 ] Gustave Dron Hospital, Tourcoing, France.
                [4 ] Abbas Medical Centre, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
                [5 ] La Paloma Hospital, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
                [6 ] Alberta Public Laboratories, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
                [7 ] University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
                [8 ] WHO-collaborating Centre for Diabetes, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
                [9 ] Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
                [10 ] South West Sydney Local Health District, School of Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
                [11 ] Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
                [12 ] Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Centre, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
                [13 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
                Article
                10.1002/dmrr.3280
                32176444
                730278fd-0b98-4a81-aee2-75a9b1bbefe0
                History

                guidelines,microbiology,diagnosis,diabetic foot,foot ulcer,osteomyelitis,infection

                Comments

                Comment on this article