33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Six months versus 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DAPT-STEMI): randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To show that limiting dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to six months in patients with event-free ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) results in a non-inferior clinical outcome versus DAPT for 12 months.

          Design

          Prospective, randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.

          Setting

          Patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and second generation zotarolimus-eluting stent.

          Participants

          Patients with STEMI aged 18 to 85 that underwent a primary PCI with the implantation of second generation drug-eluting stents were enrolled in the trial. Patients that were event-free at six months after primary PCI were randomised at this time point.

          Interventions

          Patients that were taking DAPT and were event-free at six months were randomised 1:1 to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) (ie, aspirin only) or to DAPT for an additional six months. All patients that were randomised were then followed for another 18 months (ie, 24 months after the primary PCI).

          Main outcome measures

          The primary endpoint was a composite of all cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, any revascularisation, stroke, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding at 18 months after randomisation.

          Results

          A total of 1100 patients were enrolled in the trial between 19 December 2011 and 30 June 2015. 870 were randomised: 432 to SAPT versus 438 to DAPT. The primary endpoint occurred in 4.8% of patients receiving SAPT versus 6.6% of patients receiving DAPT (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 1.27, P=0.26). Non-inferiority was met (P=0.004 for non-inferiority), as the upper 95% confidence interval of 1.27 was smaller than the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1.66.

          Conclusions

          DAPT to six months was non-inferior to DAPT for 12 months in patients with event-free STEMI at six months after primary PCI with second generation drug-eluting stents.

          Trial registration

          Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01459627.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials

            Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor prevents ischaemic events after coronary stenting, but increases bleeding. Guidelines support weighting bleeding risk before the selection of treatment duration, but no standardised tool exists for this purpose.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

              Dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces ischemia but increases bleeding.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: cardiologist
                Role: cardiologist
                Role: cardiologist
                Role: professor and cardiologist
                Role: professor and cardiologist
                Role: cardiologist
                Role: cardiologist
                Role: cardiologist
                Role: professor
                Role: cardiologist
                Role: professor
                Role: cardiologist
                Role: cardiologist
                Role: professor
                Role: research program coordinator
                Role: professor
                Role: cardiology fellow
                Role: professor
                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                BMJ-UK
                bmj
                The BMJ
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1756-1833
                2018
                02 October 2018
                : 363
                : k3793
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Isala Hartcentrum, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, Netherlands
                [2 ]Cardiovascular Department, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
                [3 ]Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [4 ]American Heart of Poland, Ustroń, Poland
                [5 ]Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
                [6 ]Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [7 ]University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
                [8 ]American Heart of Poland, Chrzanów, Poland
                [9 ]Haga Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands
                [10 ]Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands
                [11 ]Department of Cardiology, Oslo Academic University, Oslo, Norway
                [12 ]Department of Cardiology, University & Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland
                [13 ]Department of Cardiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
                [14 ]Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [15 ]Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, Sweden
                [16 ]Heart Centre, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: E Kedhi e.kedhi@ 123456isala.nl
                Article
                kede043836
                10.1136/bmj.k3793
                6167608
                30279197
                5b501bec-d394-41d5-b862-7edf26fbb12c
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 22 August 2018
                Categories
                Research
                1302

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article