45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Association Between Physician Burnout and Patient Safety, Professionalism, and Patient Satisfaction : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is physician burnout associated with low-quality, unsafe patient care?

          Findings

          This meta-analysis of 47 studies on 42 473 physicians found that burnout is associated with 2-fold increased odds for unsafe care, unprofessional behaviors, and low patient satisfaction. The depersonalization dimension of burnout had the strongest links with these outcomes; the association between unprofessionalism and burnout was particularly high across studies of early-career physicians.

          Meaning

          Physician burnout is associated with suboptimal patient care and professional inefficiencies; health care organizations have a duty to jointly improve these core and complementary facets of their function.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Physician burnout has taken the form of an epidemic that may affect core domains of health care delivery, including patient safety, quality of care, and patient satisfaction. However, this evidence has not been systematically quantified.

          Objective

          To examine whether physician burnout is associated with an increased risk of patient safety incidents, suboptimal care outcomes due to low professionalism, and lower patient satisfaction.

          Data Sources

          MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases were searched until October 22, 2017, using combinations of the key terms physicians, burnout, and patient care. Detailed standardized searches with no language restriction were undertaken. The reference lists of eligible studies and other relevant systematic reviews were hand-searched.

          Study Selection

          Quantitative observational studies.

          Data Extraction and Synthesis

          Two independent reviewers were involved. The main meta-analysis was followed by subgroup and sensitivity analyses. All analyses were performed using random-effects models. Formal tests for heterogeneity ( I 2) and publication bias were performed.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The core outcomes were the quantitative associations between burnout and patient safety, professionalism, and patient satisfaction reported as odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% CIs.

          Results

          Of the 5234 records identified, 47 studies on 42 473 physicians (25 059 [59.0%] men; median age, 38 years [range, 27-53 years]) were included in the meta-analysis. Physician burnout was associated with an increased risk of patient safety incidents (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.59-2.40), poorer quality of care due to low professionalism (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.87-2.85), and reduced patient satisfaction (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.42-3.68). The heterogeneity was high and the study quality was low to moderate. The links between burnout and low professionalism were larger in residents and early-career (≤5 years post residency) physicians compared with middle- and late-career physicians (Cohen Q = 7.27; P = .003). The reporting method of patient safety incidents and professionalism (physician-reported vs system-recorded) significantly influenced the main results (Cohen Q = 8.14; P = .007).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This meta-analysis provides evidence that physician burnout may jeopardize patient care; reversal of this risk has to be viewed as a fundamental health care policy goal across the globe. Health care organizations are encouraged to invest in efforts to improve physician wellness, particularly for early-career physicians. The methods of recording patient care quality and safety outcomes require improvements to concisely capture the outcome of burnout on the performance of health care organizations.

          Abstract

          This meta-analysis examines whether physician burnout is associated with low-quality, unsafe patient care.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA Intern Med
          JAMA Intern Med
          JAMA Intern Med
          JAMA Internal Medicine
          American Medical Association
          2168-6106
          2168-6114
          4 September 2018
          October 2018
          4 September 2019
          : 178
          : 10
          : 1317-1330
          Affiliations
          [1 ]National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
          [2 ]NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
          [3 ]Bradford Institute for Health Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
          [4 ]Laboratory of Hygiene, Aristotle Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
          [5 ]Research Institute, Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Newcastle, United Kingdom
          [6 ]Westminster Centre for Resilience, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom
          [7 ]Institute of Applied Health Research College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Murray Learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
          Author notes
          Article Information
          Accepted for Publication: June 15, 2018.
          Corresponding Author: Maria Panagioti, PhD, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom ( maria.panagioti@ 123456manchester.ac.uk ).
          Published Online: September 4, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3713
          Author Contributions: Dr Panagioti had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
          Concept and design: Panagioti, Geraghty, Panagopoulou, Chew-Graham, Peters, Riley, Esmail.
          Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Panagioti, Geraghty, Johnson, Zhou, Hodkinson.
          Drafting of the manuscript: Panagioti, Hodkinson.
          Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Panagioti, Geraghty, Johnson, Zhou, Panagopoulou, Chew-Graham, Peters, Hodkinson, Riley, Esmail.
          Statistical analysis: Panagioti, Hodkinson.
          Obtained funding: Panagioti.
          Administrative, technical, or material support: Geraghty, Johnson, Zhou.
          Supervision: Panagioti, Panagopoulou.
          Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
          Funding/Support: This study was funded by the United Kingdom National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research (project 298) and the NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre funded Dr Panagioti’s time contributed to this project. The research team members were independent from the funding agencies.
          Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
          Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR, or the Department of Health.
          Article
          PMC6233757 PMC6233757 6233757 ioi180055
          10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3713
          6233757
          30193239
          20c393c3-fdda-433f-991a-3d14e1293eed
          Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
          History
          : 12 March 2018
          : 4 June 2018
          : 15 June 2018
          Categories
          Research
          Research
          Original Investigation
          Physician Work Environment and Well-Being
          Online First

          Comments

          Comment on this article