15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effect of parturient height on the median effective dose of intrathecally administered ropivacaine

      research-article
      ,
      Annals of Saudi Medicine
      King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Pain during cesarean delivery is one of the more common reasons for a successful medico-legal claim. However, creating an extensive block area can result in hypotension, so determining the precise dose of local anesthetic is critical.

          OBJECTIVES

          Investigate effects of parturient height on the median effective dose (ED50) of intrathecally-administered ropivacaine.

          DESIGN

          Prospective cross-sectional analytic study.

          SETTING

          Anesthesiology department in a provinicial hospital in China.

          METHODS

          Parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia were stratified according to height as follows: 150 cm to 155 cm, 156 cm to 160 cm, 161 cm to 165 cm and 166 cm to 170 cm. The spinal component of the anesthetic was established by bolus administration of up-and-down doses of 0.75% plain ropivacaine as determined by the Dixon method. The initial dose of ropivacaine was 5.79 mg and the testing interval dose change was set at 0.75 mg. The block height for the first cold feeling at T5 was considered satisfactory anesthesia.

          MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

          ED50 values and vasopressor requirements, nausea, vomiting and shivering.

          RESULTS

          In 120 parturients, the ED50 for satisfactory block height using intrathecal ropivacaine was 5.92 mg (95% confidence interval[CI] 5.02–6.86 mg) patients of 150 to 155 cm in height; 6.52 mg (95% CI 5.45–7.65 mg) in 156 cm to 160 cm; 7.49 mg (95%CI 6.83–8.25 mg) in 161 cm to 165 cm; 8.35 mg ( 95%CI 7.55–9.23 mg) in 166 to 170 cm. The ED50 of ropivacaine increased with increasing height of the subject. There were no significant differences in incidence of hypotension, vasopressor requirements, nausea, vomiting and shivering.

          CONCLUSION

          The ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine using sensitivity to cold sensation increased with parturient height, indicating that dose may be determined in part by height.

          LIMITATION

          The ED95 rather than the ED50 for spinal anesthesia is more useful clinically. We did not control for the effect of weight on the dose of local anesthetic. Factors such as baricity, volume, concentration injected, temperature of the solution, and viscosity can affect intrathecal spread of the local anesthetics and block quality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a précis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research.

          Sequential design methods for binary response variables exist for determination of the concentration or dose associated with the 50% point along the dose-response curve; the up-and-down method of Dixon and Mood is now commonly used in anesthesia research. There have been important developments in statistical methods that (1) allow the design of experiments for the measurement of the response at any point (quantile) along the dose-response curve, (2) demonstrate the risk of certain statistical methods commonly used in literature reports, (3) allow the estimation of the concentration or dose-the target dose-associated with the chosen quantile without the assumption of the symmetry of the tolerance distribution, and (4) set bounds on the probability of response at this target dose. This article details these developments, briefly surveys current use of the up-and-down method in anesthesia research, reanalyzes published reports using the up-and-down method for the study of the epidural relief of pain during labor, and discusses appropriate inferences from up-and-down method studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Intrathecal drug spread.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Are estimates of MAC reliable?

              Potency of inhaled anesthetics (minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]) is typically studied in humans using an "up-down" approach in which the (quantal) response to skin incision is assessed only once for each individual, so that each individual's MAC is never determined. The authors examined the influence of interindividual variability and study design issues (e.g., the number of patients enrolled in a study) on the accuracy of MAC estimates. The typical sequence of a MAC study was simulated. The authors varied and tested the impact of several factors: anesthetic concentration used to start a study; number of "crossovers" (successive patients having different responses to skin incision) to terminate a study; concentration increment between consecutive patients; interindividual variability; and "measurement error." For each factor, simulations were replicated 500 times, and the resulting estimates were summarized. Starting an experiment below or above the "true" value led to slightly biased MAC estimates; in contrast, variability was underestimated with starting concentrations close to the true value. More than six crossovers improved MAC estimates minimally but increased variability estimates toward true values. A larger increment size affected MAC minimally and increased variability estimates toward true values. A larger interindividual variability led to more "outlier" estimates for MAC. Under many conditions, several of 500 replicates yielded MAC estimates that deviated more than 10% or even more than 25% from the "true" value. Individual experiments may yield inaccurate MAC estimates. This inaccuracy is minimized as the number of crossovers increases; however, improvement diminishes as the number of crossovers exceeds six.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Saudi Med
                Ann Saudi Med
                Annals of Saudi Medicine
                King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
                0256-4947
                0975-4466
                Sep-Oct 2016
                : 36
                : 5
                : 328-333
                Affiliations
                From the Department of Anesthesiology, Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Xiangdi Yu, Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, No 83 Zhongshan Eastern Road, Guiyang, Guizhou 550002 China, T: +8618212004663, xiangdi_yu@ 123456163.com , ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5010-3145
                Article
                asm-5-328
                10.5144/0256-4947.2016.328
                6074313
                27710984
                674649ba-9023-4541-a050-9140101d0888
                Copyright © 2016, Annals of Saudi Medicine

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article