8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Advancing next generation nanolithography with infiltration synthesis of hybrid nanocomposite resists

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Novel positive-tone hybrid resists developed by vapor-phase inorganic infiltration feature fully tunable resist performance parameters and high-aspect-ratio pattern transfer capability.

          Abstract

          Organic–inorganic hybrid resists are emerging as an effective way of addressing stringent process requirements for aggressive down-scaling of semiconducting devices. However, hybrid resists generally require complex chemical synthesis while being predominantly negative-tone with high dose requirements. For positive-tone processes and high-aspect-ratio pattern transfers, resist choices are limited to costly, non-hybrid alternatives, whose etch resistance is still inferior compared with hybrid resists. Here, we demonstrate a novel hybrid positive-tone resist platform utilizing simple ex situ vapor-phase inorganic infiltration into standard resist materials. A model system based on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) thin film hybridized with aluminum oxide has been demonstrated for electron-beam lithography patterning, featuring a fully controllable critical exposure dose, contrast, and etch resistance. The hybrid resist not only achieves contrast as high as ∼30, six-fold enhancement over standard PMMA, but also enables Si nanostructures with resolution down to ∼30 nm and an aspect ratio as high as ∼17, owing to enhancement of the Si etch selectivity to ∼70, with an estimated achievable maximum of ∼300, far exceeding known commercial positive-tone resist systems. The easy implementabilility, combined with versatile ex situ control of resist characteristics, makes this hybrid resist synthesis approach uniquely suited for addressing the resist performance and high throughput required for advanced nanolithography techniques, such as extreme ultraviolet lithography, potentially.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          High aspect ratio silicon etch: A review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Resists for sub-20-nm electron beam lithography with a focus on HSQ: state of the art.

            In the past decade, the feature size in ultra large-scale integration (ULSI) has been continuously decreasing, leading to nanostructure fabrication. Nowadays, various lithographic techniques ranging from conventional methods (e.g. photolithography, x-rays) to unconventional ones (e.g. nanoimprint lithography, self-assembled monolayers) are used to create small features. Among all these, resist-based electron beam lithography (EBL) seems to be the most suitable technique when nanostructures are desired. The achievement of sub-20-nm structures using EBL is a very sensitive process determined by various factors, starting with the choice of resist material and ending with the development process. After a short introduction to nanolithography, a framework for the nanofabrication process is presented. To obtain finer patterns, improvements of the material properties of the resist are very important. The present review gives an overview of the best resolution obtained with several types of both organic and inorganic resists. For each resist, the advantages and disadvantages are presented. Although very small features (2-5 nm) have been obtained with PMMA and inorganic metal halides, for the former resist the low etch resistance and instability of the pattern, and for the latter the delicate handling of the samples and the difficulties encountered in the spinning session, prevent the wider use of these e-beam resists in nanostructure fabrication. A relatively new e-beam resist, hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ), is very suitable when aiming for sub-20-nm resolution. The changes that this resist undergoes before, during and after electron beam exposure are discussed and the influence of various parameters (e.g. pre-baking, exposure dose, writing strategy, development process) on the resolution is presented. In general, high resolution can be obtained using ultrathin resist layers and when the exposure is performed at high acceleration voltages. Usually, one of the properties of the resist material is improved to the detriment of another. It has been demonstrated that aging, baking at low temperature, immediate exposure after spin coating, the use of a weak developer and development at a low temperature increase the sensitivity but decrease the contrast. The surface roughness is more pronounced at low exposure doses (high sensitivity) and high baking temperatures. A delay between exposure and development seems to increase both contrast and the sensitivity of samples which are stored in a vacuum after exposure, compared to those stored in air. Due to its relative novelty, the capabilities of HSQ have not been completely explored, hence there is still room for improvement. Applications of this electron beam resist in lithographic techniques other than EBL are also discussed. Finally, conclusions and an outlook are presented.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                JMCCCX
                Journal of Materials Chemistry C
                J. Mater. Chem. C
                Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
                2050-7526
                2050-7534
                July 25 2019
                2019
                : 7
                : 29
                : 8803-8812
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Functional Nanomaterials
                [2 ]Brookhaven National Laboratory
                [3 ]Upton
                [4 ]USA
                [5 ]Department of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering
                [6 ]Stony Brook University
                [7 ]Stony Brook
                [8 ]Department of Materials Science and Engineering
                [9 ]University of Texas at Dallas
                [10 ]Richardson
                Article
                10.1039/C9TC02974E
                87b9f828-4f94-456a-840b-1f24710afcb2
                © 2019

                Free to read

                http://rsc.li/journals-terms-of-use#chorus

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article