4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of four resin composites subjected to thermocycling aging

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Surface smoothness considered to be a significant part of the appearance and success of the restorative materials. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of four different polishing systems on surface roughness of four resin composite materials when subjected to thermocycling.

          Materials and Methods:

          This research was designed as a comparative study. Four resin composites were used which are: Nanofill composite (Filtek Supreme XT), nanohybrid composite (Tetric EvoCeram), microfill composite (Renamel Microfill), and microhybrid composite (Filtek Z250). Sixty disk-shaped specimens of each resin composite were prepared then divided into four groups according to the polishing system ( n = 15); which were Sof-Lex Spiral, Diatech Shapeguard, Venus Supra, and Astropol. The specimens of each group were polished following the manufactures’ instructions, then surface roughness, R a values in μm were measured initially and after the specimens subjected to thermal cycling. The influence of resin composites, polishing systems, thermocycling, and their interaction effects on surface roughness (R a mean values) was statistically analyzed mainly by using the repeated measures two-way analysis of variance test, whereas the Bonferroni’'s post hoc test was applied for pair-wise comparisons. P ≤ 0.05 was used as the significant level.

          Results:

          The results of this study revealed that Filtek Supreme XT recorded significantly the lowest mean surface roughness (R a) of 0.2533 ± 0.073 μm ( P < 0.001). The Sof-Lex Spiral polishing system revealed significantly the lowest mean surface roughness (Ra) of 0.2734 ± 0.0903 μm ( P = 0.004). Regardless of composite type and polishing system, there was a statistically significant increase in mean surface roughness values (R a) in μm after thermocycling (0.2251 ± 0.0496 μm and 0.3506 ± 0.0868 μm, respectively) ( P < 0.001).

          Conclusion:

          Resin composite type, polishing method, and thermocycling aging significantly affected the surface roughness of composites; Nanofill composite and Sof-Lex Spiral polishing system provided the lowest values of surface roughness which increased after thermocycling.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Resin composite restorative materials.

          This paper surveys the most important developments in resin-based dental composites and focuses on the deficits (e.g. polymerization shrinkage) and strengths of the materials and their clinical implications. Moreover, differences between composite categories, such as hybrid, nanohybrid, microfilled, packable, ormocer-based, silorane-based, polyacid-modified composites (compomers) and flowable composites are highlighted, especially in view of their mechanical behaviour. In addition to the classical dimethacrylate-based composites, special attention is given to alternative monomers, such as siloranes, ormocers or high-molecular-weight dimethacrylate monomers (e.g. dimer acid-based dimethacrylates and tricyclodecane (TCD)-urethane), analysing their advantages, behaviour and abilities. Finally, the paper attempts to establish the needs and wishes of clinicians for further development of resin-based composites. © 2011 Australian Dental Association.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nanohybrid resin composites: nanofiller loaded materials or traditional microhybrid resins?

            Nanohybrid resin composites present conventional particles to be mixed with nanomeric fillers and, therefore, it is unknown whether they may perform similarly to nanofilled or microhybrid resins. The current study investigated the properties of nanohybrid resins (TPH3, Grandio, Premise, Concept Advanced) in comparison with a nanofilled (Supreme XT) and a microhybrid (Z250) composite. The inorganic fillers were characterized by SEM/EDS analysis. Diametral tensile strength (DTS), surface roughness before and after toothbrush abrasion, Knoop Hardness (KHN), water sorption and solubility were evaluated. The data were separately analyzed by ANOVA and the Student-Newman-Keuls' tests (p < 0.05). The results of all analyses were material-dependent. Noticeable differences in filler size and shape were detected among the materials. Supreme XT generally showed higher DTS and KHN compared to all the nanohybrids and also showed lower surface roughness before and after toothbrush abrasion compared to most of the materials tested. Similar results were generally detected for the nanohybrids compared with the microhybrid material. In conclusion, the nanohybrid resins generally presented inferior properties compared with the nanofilled composite and either similar or slightly better properties compared to the microhybrid material. Under clinical conditions, nanohybrid resins may not perform similarly to nanofilled materials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Do nanofill or submicron composites show improved smoothness and gloss? A systematic review of in vitro studies.

              Despite nanofill and submicron composites' aim to provide high initial polishing combined with superior smoothness and gloss retention, the question still remains whether clinicians should consider using these new materials over traditional microhybrids. The aim of this paper was to systematically review the literature on how nanofills and submicrons react to polishing procedures and surface challenges in vitro compared with microhybrids. The paper has also given an overview of the compositional characteristics of all resin composites and polishing systems whose performance was presented herein.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Dent Res J (Isfahan)
                Dent Res J (Isfahan)
                DRJ
                Dental Research Journal
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                1735-3327
                2008-0255
                2023
                28 March 2023
                : 20
                : 35
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
                [2 ]Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia,
                [3 ]Department of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Sahar Mohamed Elmarsafy, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, P.O. Box 715, Makkah, Saudi Arabia. E-mail: selmarsafy@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                DRJ-20-35
                10166756
                d5d44ae7-e2c3-4891-8928-8ff1f4fc5901
                Copyright: © 2023 Dental Research Journal

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 24 May 2022
                : 29 July 2022
                : 28 December 2022
                Categories
                Original Article

                Dentistry
                composite resins,dental polishing,surface properties,thermocycling
                Dentistry
                composite resins, dental polishing, surface properties, thermocycling

                Comments

                Comment on this article