Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Role of Positive Parenting in the Association Between Neighborhood Social Disadvantage and Brain Development Across Adolescence

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This longitudinal study investigates whether positive parenting behaviors moderate the effects of socioeconomic disadvantage on brain development and adaptive functioning in adolescents.

          Key Points

          Question

          Does positive parenting buffer the effects of neighborhood-level and family-level socioeconomic disadvantage on adolescent brain development?

          Findings

          In this longitudinal study of 166 adolescents, positive parenting moderated the effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on the development of the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Prefrontal cortex development was in turn associated with school completion.

          Meaning

          While socioeconomic disadvantage has established negative mental health and other outcomes, the family environment may serve to mitigate some of these effects via effects on the developing brain.

          Abstract

          Importance

          The negative effects of socioeconomic disadvantage on lifelong functioning are pronounced, with some evidence suggesting that these effects are mediated by changes in brain development. To our knowledge, no research has investigated whether parenting might buffer these negative effects.

          Objective

          To establish whether positive parenting behaviors moderate the effects of socioeconomic disadvantage on brain development and adaptive functioning in adolescents.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          In this longitudinal study of adolescents from schools in Melbourne, Australia, data were collected at 3 assessments between 2004 and 2012. Data were analyzed between August 2016 and April 2017.

          Exposures

          Both family (parental income-to-needs, occupation, and education level) and neighborhood measures of socioeconomic disadvantage were assessed. Positive maternal parenting behaviors were observed during interactions in early adolescence.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Structural magnetic resonance imaging scans at 3 times (early, middle, and late adolescence) from ages 11 to 20 years. Global and academic functioning was assessed during late adolescence. We used linear mixed models to examine the effect of family and neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage as well as the moderating effect of positive parenting on adolescent brain development. We used mediation models to examine whether brain developmental trajectories predicted functional outcomes during late adolescence.

          Results

          Of the included 166 adolescents, 86 (51.8%) were male. We found that neighborhood, but not family, socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with altered brain development from early (mean [SD] age, 12.79 [0.425] years) to late (mean [SD] age, 19.08 [0.460] years) adolescence, predominantly in the temporal lobes (temporal cortex: random field theory corrected; left amygdala: B, −0.237; P < .001; right amygdala: B, −0.209; P = .008). Additionally, positive parenting moderated the effects of neighborhood disadvantage on the development of dorsal frontal and lateral orbitofrontal cortices as well as the effects of family disadvantage on the development of the amygdala (occupation: B, 0.382; P = .004; income-to-needs: B, 27.741; P = .004), with some male-specific findings. The pattern of dorsal frontal cortical development in males from disadvantaged neighborhoods exposed to low maternal positivity predicted increased rates of school noncompletion (indirect effect, −0.018; SE, 0.01; 95% CI, −0.053 to −0.001).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Our findings highlight the importance of neighborhood disadvantage in influencing brain developmental trajectories. Further, to our knowledge, we present the first evidence that positive maternal parenting might ameliorate the negative effects of socioeconomic disadvantage on frontal lobe development (with implications for functioning) during adolescence. Results have relevance for designing interventions for children from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA Psychiatry
          JAMA Psychiatry
          JAMA Psychiatry
          JAMA Psychiatry
          American Medical Association
          2168-622X
          2168-6238
          21 June 2017
          2 August 2017
          August 2017
          2 August 2018
          : 74
          : 8
          : 824-832
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
          [2 ]Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
          [3 ]Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene
          [4 ]Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle
          [5 ]Oregon Research Institute, Eugene
          [6 ]Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
          Author notes
          Article Information
          Corresponding Author: Sarah Whittle, PhD, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, 161 Barry St, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia ( swhittle@ 123456unimelb.edu.au ).
          Accepted for Publication: May 3, 2017.
          Published Online: June 21, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1558
          Author Contributions: Dr Whittle had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
          Study concept and design: Whittle, Simmons, Dennison, Pantelis, Sheeber, Allen.
          Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
          Drafting of the manuscript: Whittle, Vijayakumar, Simmons, Dennison.
          Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
          Statistical analysis: Whittle, Vijayakumar, Simmons.
          Obtained funding: Whittle, Simmons, Pantelis, Allen.
          Administrative, technical, or material support: Vijayakumar, Simmons, Schwartz, Pantelis, Sheeber, Byrne, Allen.
          Supervision: Pantelis, Allen.
          Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
          Funding/Support: This work was supported by grant DP0878136 from the Australian Research Council; grants 350241, 1007716, 628386, and 1105825 from the National Health and Medical Research Council; and the Colonial Foundation.
          Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
          Additional Contributions: We thank Camille Deane, BA (The University of Melbourne), for providing key theoretical ideas for the article. Ms Deane was not compensated for her contribution.
          Article
          PMC5710640 PMC5710640 5710640 yoi170037
          10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1558
          5710640
          28636697
          dfaf8a8a-17da-405a-8bd6-0c40a5c90d7c
          Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
          History
          : 6 January 2017
          : 3 May 2017
          : 3 May 2017
          Funding
          Funded by: Australian Research Council
          Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council
          Funded by: Colonial Foundation
          Categories
          Research
          Research
          Original Investigation
          Online First

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content131

          Cited by73