13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Success stories and emerging themes in conservation physiology

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The potential benefits of a physiological approach to conservation are well-established. Here we present a cross-section of conservation physiology success stories and a discussion of their shared characteristics to illustrate how the discipline has tangibly contributed to conservation and management across a diversity of topics, taxa, and spatial scales.

          Abstract

          The potential benefits of physiology for conservation are well established and include greater specificity of management techniques, determination of cause–effect relationships, increased sensitivity of health and disturbance monitoring and greater capacity for predicting future change. While descriptions of the specific avenues in which conservation and physiology can be integrated are readily available and important to the continuing expansion of the discipline of ‘conservation physiology’, to date there has been no assessment of how the field has specifically contributed to conservation success. However, the goal of conservation physiology is to foster conservation solutions and it is therefore important to assess whether physiological approaches contribute to downstream conservation outcomes and management decisions. Here, we present eight areas of conservation concern, ranging from chemical contamination to invasive species to ecotourism, where physiological approaches have led to beneficial changes in human behaviour, management or policy. We also discuss the shared characteristics of these successes, identifying emerging themes in the discipline. Specifically, we conclude that conservation physiology: (i) goes beyond documenting change to provide solutions; (ii) offers a diversity of physiological metrics beyond glucocorticoids (stress hormones); (iii) includes approaches that are transferable among species, locations and times; (iv) simultaneously allows for human use and benefits to wildlife; and (v) is characterized by successes that can be difficult to find in the primary literature. Overall, we submit that the field of conservation physiology has a strong foundation of achievements characterized by a diversity of conservation issues, taxa, physiological traits, ecosystem types and spatial scales. We hope that these concrete successes will encourage the continued evolution and use of physiological tools within conservation-based research and management plans.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The need for evidence-based conservation.

          Much of current conservation practice is based upon anecdote and myth rather than upon the systematic appraisal of the evidence, including experience of others who have tackled the same problem. We suggest that this is a major problem for conservationists and requires a rethinking of the manner in which conservation operates. There is an urgent need for mechanisms that review available information and make recommendations to practitioners. We suggest a format for web-based databases that could provide the required information in accessible form.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen.

            Municipal wastewaters are a complex mixture containing estrogens and estrogen mimics that are known to affect the reproductive health of wild fishes. Male fishes downstream of some wastewater outfalls produce vitellogenin (VTG) (a protein normally synthesized by females during oocyte maturation) and early-stage eggs in their testes, and this feminization has been attributed to the presence of estrogenic substances such as natural estrogens [estrone or 17beta-estradiol (E2)], the synthetic estrogen used in birth-control pills [17 alpha-ethynylestradiol (EE2)], or weaker estrogen mimics such as nonylphenol in the water. Despite widespread evidence that male fishes are being feminized, it is not known whether these low-level, chronic exposures adversely impact the sustainability of wild populations. We conducted a 7-year, whole-lake experiment at the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) in northwestern Ontario, Canada, and showed that chronic exposure of fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) to low concentrations (5-6 ng x L(-1)) of the potent 17 alpha-ethynylestradiol led to feminization of males through the production of vitellogenin mRNA and protein, impacts on gonadal development as evidenced by intersex in males and altered oogenesis in females, and, ultimately, a near extinction of this species from the lake. Our observations demonstrate that the concentrations of estrogens and their mimics observed in freshwaters can impact the sustainability of wild fish populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Conservation physiology.

              Conservation biologists increasingly face the need to provide legislators, courts and conservation managers with data on causal mechanisms underlying conservation problems such as species decline. To develop and monitor solutions, conservation biologists are progressively using more techniques that are physiological. Here, we review the emerging discipline of conservation physiology and suggest that, for conservation strategies to be successful, it is important to understand the physiological responses of organisms to their changed environment. New physiological techniques can enable a rapid assessment of the causes of conservation problems and the consequences of conservation actions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Conserv Physiol
                Conserv Physiol
                conphys
                conphys
                Conservation Physiology
                Oxford University Press
                2051-1434
                2016
                05 January 2016
                : 4
                : 1
                : cov057
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4
                [2 ]Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5B6
                [3 ]School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
                [4 ]Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA
                [5 ]Department of Research, Conservation and Collections, Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA
                [6 ]John H. Prescott Marine Laboratory, Research Department, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA
                [7 ]Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
                [8 ]Department of Biology, Western University, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7
                [9 ]Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
                [10 ]Department of Biology and Centre for Forest Interdisciplinary Research, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3B 2E9
                [11 ]Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4. Tel: +1 519 253 3000. Email: madlige@ 123456uwindsor.ca

                Editor: Craig Franklin

                Article
                cov057
                10.1093/conphys/cov057
                4922248
                27382466
                1d18f5ce-e073-4afc-9ba5-fd4871d7068a
                © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 September 2015
                : 5 November 2015
                : 9 November 2015
                Page count
                Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
                Funded by: University of Windsor http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009154
                Funded by: Dalhousie University http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002977
                Funded by: Canadian Society of Zoologists
                Funded by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000038
                Award ID: PGS-D (427552)
                Funded by: Canada Research Chairs program
                Funded by: National Science Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
                Award ID: BCS-1134687
                Funded by: National Science Foundation's
                Award ID: 1340856
                Funded by: US Department of Agriculture
                Award ID: 2015-67013-23138
                Funded by: National Science Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
                Award ID: 1241889
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: R01GM109499, R01TW010286
                Funded by: US Department of Agriculture
                Award ID: NRI 2006-01370, 2009-35102-0543
                Funded by: US Environmental Protection Agency
                Award ID: 83518801
                Categories
                Perspectives

                conservation physiology,ecotourism,invasive species,nutrition,sensory ecology,toxicology

                Comments

                Comment on this article