23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Psychosocial interventions for dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review of effectiveness and implementation readiness

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d2949341e155"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2949341e156">Introduction</h5> <p id="d2949341e158">Despite wide uptake in high-income countries (HICs), less is known about the effectiveness and implementation of psychological, social and cognitive interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite this, such interventions are increasingly used. The aim of this review was to appraise the effectiveness and implementation readiness of psychosocial interventions for people with dementia in LMICs. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d2949341e160"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2949341e161">Methods</h5> <p id="d2949341e163">A systematic search of databases from 1998–2019. Studies were rated on two scales assessing quality and implementation readiness. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d2949341e165"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2949341e166">Results</h5> <p id="d2949341e168">Seventeen articles describing 11 interventions in six countries were evaluated. Interventions included Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST), a Multidisciplinary Cognitive Rehabilitation Programme (MCRP), singing interventions, occupational therapy and reminiscence therapy. The quality of included studies was variable, and many had low sample sizes. Evidence for improving both cognition and quality of life was found in two interventions: Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) and a Multidisciplinary Cognitive Rehabilitation Programme (MCRP). Implementation issues were more likely to be explored in studies of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) than in any other intervention. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d2949341e170"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d2949341e171">Conclusions</h5> <p id="d2949341e173">Of the included studies here, CST appears to be the most implementation ready, improving both cognition and quality of life with implementation readiness effectively explored in two LMIC countries: India and Tanzania. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

              To develop a 10-minute cognitive screening tool (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA) to assist first-line physicians in detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a clinical state that often progresses to dementia. Validation study. A community clinic and an academic center. Ninety-four patients meeting MCI clinical criteria supported by psychometric measures, 93 patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score > or =17), and 90 healthy elderly controls (NC). The MoCA and MMSE were administered to all participants, and sensitivity and specificity of both measures were assessed for detection of MCI and mild AD. Using a cutoff score 26, the MMSE had a sensitivity of 18% to detect MCI, whereas the MoCA detected 90% of MCI subjects. In the mild AD group, the MMSE had a sensitivity of 78%, whereas the MoCA detected 100%. Specificity was excellent for both MMSE and MoCA (100% and 87%, respectively). MCI as an entity is evolving and somewhat controversial. The MoCA is a brief cognitive screening tool with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting MCI as currently conceptualized in patients performing in the normal range on the MMSE.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Aging & Mental Health
                Aging & Mental Health
                Informa UK Limited
                1360-7863
                1364-6915
                December 09 2019
                : 1-12
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Research Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, University College London (UCL), London, UK;
                [2 ] Dementia Care in Schizophrenia Research Foundation (DEMCARES in SCARF), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India;
                [3 ] Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil
                Article
                10.1080/13607863.2019.1695742
                0f66ad25-6578-4baa-81f2-5d2e42ebe0ed
                © 2019

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article