There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
The potential for widespread job automation has become an important topic of discussion
in recent years, and it is thought that many American workers may need to learn new
skills or transition to new jobs to maintain stable positions in the workforce. Because
workers’ existing skills may make such transitions more or less difficult, the likelihood
of a given job being automated only tells part of the story. As such, this study uses
network science and statistics to investigate the links between jobs that arise from
their necessary skills, knowledge and abilities. The resulting network structure is
found to enhance the burden of automation within some sectors while lessening the
burden in others. Additionally, a model is proposed for quantifying the expected benefit
of specific job transitions. Its optimization reveals that the consideration of shared
skills yields better transition recommendations than automatability and job growth
alone. Finally, the potential benefit of increasing individual skills is quantified,
with respect to facilitating both job transitions and within-occupation skill redefinition.
Broadly, this study presents a framework for measuring the links between jobs and
demonstrates the importance of these links for understanding the complex effects of
automation.