15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Continuous Versus 1-Year Fixed-Duration Nivolumab in Previously Treated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 153

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          PURPOSE

          Limited data exist on the optimal duration of immunotherapy, including for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present an exploratory analysis of CheckMate 153, a largely community-based phase IIIb/IV study, to evaluate the impact of 1-year fixed-duration versus continuous therapy on the efficacy and safety of nivolumab.

          METHODS

          Patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC received nivolumab monotherapy (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Those still receiving treatment at 1 year, including patients perceived to be deriving benefit despite radiographic progression, were randomly assigned to continue nivolumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or to stop nivolumab with the option of on-study retreatment after disease progression (1-year fixed duration).

          RESULTS

          Of 1,428 patients treated, 252 were randomly assigned to continuous (n = 127) or 1-year fixed-duration (n = 125) treatment (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). Of these, 89 and 85 patients in the continuous and 1-year fixed-duration arms, respectively, had not progressed (progression-free survival [PFS] population). With minimum post–random assignment follow-up of 13.5 months, median PFS was longer with continuous versus 1-year fixed-duration treatment (PFS population: 24.7 months v 9.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.84]). Median overall survival from random assignment was longer with continuous versus 1-year fixed-duration treatment in the PFS (not reached v 32.5 months; HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.99]) and ITT (not reached v 28.8 months; HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.92]) populations. Few new-onset treatment-related adverse events occurred. No new safety signals were identified.

          CONCLUSION

          To our knowledge, these findings from an exploratory analysis represent the first randomized data on continuous versus fixed-duration immunotherapy in previously treated advanced NSCLC and suggest that continuing nivolumab beyond 1 year improves outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

          Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint-inhibitor antibody, disrupts PD-1-mediated signaling and may restore antitumor immunity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

            New England Journal of Medicine, 373(2), 123-135
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial.

              Despite recent advances in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, there remains a need for effective treatments for progressive disease. We assessed the efficacy of pembrolizumab for patients with previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Oncol
                J Clin Oncol
                jco
                JCO
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                American Society of Clinical Oncology
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                20 November 2020
                10 September 2020
                : 38
                : 33
                : 3863-3873
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]The US Oncology Network/Oncology Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH
                [ 2 ]David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA/Translational Research in Oncology-US Network, Los Angeles, CA
                [ 3 ]West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN
                [ 4 ]Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Florida Cancer Specialists, Cape Coral, FL
                [ 5 ]Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Florida Cancer Specialists, The Villages, FL
                [ 6 ]The US Oncology Network/Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO
                [ 7 ]Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
                [ 8 ]Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Chattanooga, TN
                [ 9 ]Charleston Oncology, Charleston, SC
                [ 10 ]Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
                [ 11 ]Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
                [ 12 ]Jackson Oncology Associates, Jackson, MS
                [ 13 ]Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC
                [ 14 ]Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Cancer and Blood Center, LLC, Athens, GA
                [ 15 ]Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fort Wayne, IN
                [ 16 ]CISSS Chaudiéere-Appalaches, Levis, Quebec, Canada
                [ 17 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [ 18 ]Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Florida Cancer Specialists, Ocala, FL
                [ 19 ]Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
                [ 20 ]Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX
                [ 21 ]Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ
                [ 22 ]Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
                Author notes
                David M. Waterhouse, MD, MPH, Oncology Hematology Care, 4350 Malsbary Rd FL 1, Cincinnati, OH 45242; e-mail: david.waterhouse@ 123456usoncology.com .
                Article
                2000131
                10.1200/JCO.20.00131
                7676888
                32910710
                0966fd52-a159-4f92-b6ea-623ed2b9521c
                © 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

                Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 15 July 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 21, Pages: 12
                Categories
                ORIGINAL REPORTS
                Thoracic Oncology
                Custom metadata
                v1

                Comments

                Comment on this article