8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Suppressive Impacts of Voter Identification Requirements

      1 , 1 , 2
      Sociological Perspectives
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Political observers argue that the United States is in a contemporary era of voter suppression. We study one mechanism that may limit voter participation, the requirement to show identification documents at the polls—voter ID policy. Voting rights advocates have raised concerns about disparate impacts of voter restrictions on racial minorities. However, past studies have reported conflicting results. Analyzing nationally representative data from the Current Population Survey across nine election years, we show that voter ID policies, and especially “strict photo ID policies,” have a suppressive effect on participation. Voter ID requirements can reduce the probability of self-reported voting by as much as four percentage points, enough to swing a national election. While we found suppressive effects of ID policies for all racial groups, we show that Latino citizens face disproportionately negative suppressive effects of strict ID policies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Voice and Equality : Civic Voluntarism in American Politics

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Locked OutFelon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Validation: What Big Data Reveal About Survey Misreporting and the Real Electorate

              Social scientists rely on surveys to explain political behavior. From consistent overreporting of voter turnout, it is evident that responses on survey items may be unreliable and lead scholars to incorrectly estimate the correlates of participation. Leveraging developments in technology and improvements in public records, we conduct the first-ever fifty-state vote validation. We parse overreporting due to response bias from overreporting due to inaccurate respondents. We find that nonvoters who are politically engaged and equipped with politically relevant resources consistently misreport that they voted. This finding cannot be explained by faulty registration records, which we measure with new indicators of election administration quality. Respondents are found to misreport only on survey items associated with socially desirable outcomes, which we find by validating items beyond voting, like race and party. We show that studies of representation and participation based on survey reports dramatically misestimate the differences between voters and nonvoters.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Sociological Perspectives
                Sociological Perspectives
                SAGE Publications
                0731-1214
                1533-8673
                August 2021
                December 28 2020
                August 2021
                : 64
                : 4
                : 536-562
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, USA
                [2 ]Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
                Article
                10.1177/0731121420966620
                ad870730-a0fc-4514-a0ae-401910142206
                © 2021

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article