5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparing the extraction performance of cyclodextrin-containing supramolecular deep eutectic solvents versus conventional deep eutectic solvents by headspace single drop microextraction.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A headspace single drop microextraction (HS-SDME) method coupled with high performance liquid chromatography was developed to compare the extraction of eighteen aromatic organic pollutants from aqueous solutions using cyclodextrin-based supramolecular deep eutectic solvents (SUPRADESs) and alkylammonium halide-based conventional deep eutectic solvents (DESs). Different derivatives of beta-cyclodextrin (β-CD) were employed as hydrogen bond acceptors (HBA) in SUPRADESs and the extraction performance investigated. SUPRADES comprised of the 20 wt% native β-CD HBA provided the highest enrichment factors of analytes compared to SUPRADESs comprised of other derivatives of β-CD (random methylated β-cyclodextrin, heptakis(2,3,6-tri-O-methyl)-β-cyclodextrin, and 2-hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin). In addition, native β-CD and its derivatives were dissolved in the neat DESs and their effect on the extraction of analytes examined. Dissolution of 20 wt% native β-CD in the choline chloride ([Ch+][Cl-]):2Urea DES resulted in a significant increase in the extraction efficiencies of target analytes compared to the neat [Ch+][Cl-]:2Urea DES. Under optimum conditions, the extraction method required a solvent microdroplet of 6.5 μL, 1000 rpm stir rate, 30% (w/v) salt concentration, and a temperature of 40 °C. The tetrabutylammonium chloride: 2 lactic acid DES resulted in the highest enrichment factors while the [Ch+][Cl-]:2Urea DES had the lowest for most of the analytes among the evaluated solvents. The method provided limits of detection (LODs) down to 35 μg L-1. Furthermore, the developed method was applied for the analysis of spiked tap and lake water, where relative recoveries ranging from 83.7% ̶ 119.7% and relative standard deviations lower than 19.2% were achieved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Chromatogr A
          Journal of chromatography. A
          Elsevier BV
          1873-3778
          0021-9673
          Nov 22 2021
          : 1658
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA; Ames Laboratory-USDOE, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.
          [2 ] Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.
          [3 ] Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA; Ames Laboratory-USDOE, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA. Electronic address: andersoj@iastate.edu.
          Article
          S0021-9673(21)00712-3
          10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462588
          34662824
          98a4c1e8-562f-48ec-bdd9-8c6f4c5ecdd0
          History

          Cyclodextrins,Supramolecular deep eutectic solvents,Organic pollutants,High performance liquid chromatography,Headspace single drop microextraction

          Comments

          Comment on this article