11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Deprescribing in primary care in Portugal (DePil17-20): a three-phase observational and experimental study protocol

      protocol

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Polypharmacy is commonly defined as the simultaneous taking of five or more drugs. Deprescribing is the process of tapering or stopping medications with the aim of improving patient outcomes and optimising current therapy, and there are several tools aiming at identifying potentially inappropriate medications, especially in the elderly. The direct involvement of patients and their caregivers in the choice and administration of drugs has long been known to be very important, but it is not usually applied. The aim of this study is to assess the knowledge of older adults about deprescription, the effect on willingness to have regular medications deprescribed and its quality-of-life outcome.

          Methods and analysis

          This study protocol comprises three phases. The first two phases will be nationwide and aim to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of polypharmacy and assess the barriers and facilitators of deprescribing perceived by older adults, as well as their willingness to have regular medications deprescribed and to self-medicate. The third and last phase will be a non-pharmacological randomised clinical study to measure older patients’ acceptance to have regular medications deprescribed and related quality of life.

          Ethics and dissemination

          The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. It has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Beira Interior and Portuguese National Data Protection Commission. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. In short, no action will be taken without written consent from patients and doctors.

          Trial registration number

          NCT03283735.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient barriers to and enablers of deprescribing: a systematic review.

            Inappropriate medication use is common in the elderly and the risks associated with their use are well known. The term deprescribing has been utilised to describe the complex process that is required for the safe and effective cessation of inappropriate medications. Given the primacy of the consumer in health care, their views must be central in the development of any deprescribing process. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers that may influence a patient's decision to cease a medication. A systematic search of MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, EMBASE, CINAHL, Informit and Scopus was conducted and augmented with a manual search. Numerous search terms relating to withdrawal of medications and consumers' beliefs were utilised. Articles were included if the barriers or enablers were directly patient/carer reported and related to long-term medication(s) that they were currently taking or had recently ceased. Determination of relevance and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Content analysis with coding was utilised for synthesis of results. Twenty-one articles met the criteria and were included in the review. Three themes, disagreement/agreement with 'appropriateness' of cessation, absence/presence of a 'process' for cessation, and negative/positive 'influences' to cease medication, were identified as both potential barriers and enablers, with 'fear' of cessation and 'dislike' of medications as a fourth barrier and enabler, respectively. The most common barrier/enabler identified was 'appropriateness' of cessation, with 15 studies identifying this as a barrier and 18 as an enabler. The decision to stop a medication by an individual is influenced by multiple competing barriers and enablers. Knowledge of these will aid in the development of a deprescribing process, particularly in approaching the topic of cessation with the patient and what process should be utilised. However, further research is required to determine if the proposed patient-centred deprescribing process will result in improved patient outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The feasibility and effect of deprescribing in older adults on mortality and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Deprescribing is a suggested intervention to reverse the potential iatrogenic harms of inappropriate polypharmacy. The review aimed to determine whether or not deprescribing is a safe, effective and feasible intervention to modify mortality and health outcomes in older adults.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2018
                17 July 2018
                : 8
                : 7
                : e019542
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentFaculty of Health Sciences , University of Beira Interior , Covilhã, Portugal
                [2 ] departmentUSF Pulsar , ARS Centro , Coimbra, Portugal
                [3 ] departmentFaculty of Medicine , University of Coimbra , Coimbra, Portugal
                [4 ] departmentUSF Topázio , ARS Centro , Coimbra, Portugal
                [5 ] departmentUCSP Mealhada , ARS Centro , Mealhada, Portugal
                [6 ] CINTESIS - Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Service , Porto, Portugal
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] MD Pedro Augusto Simões; pedro.augusto.simoes@ 123456ubi.pt
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4692-2003
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2264-7086
                Article
                bmjopen-2017-019542
                10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019542
                6059343
                30018092
                c293238e-b70e-4620-a449-03ddbc453c21
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 12 November 2017
                : 09 May 2018
                : 07 June 2018
                Categories
                Patient-Centred Medicine
                Protocol
                1506
                1722
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                deprescribing,polypharmacy,elderly,willingness,quality of life
                Medicine
                deprescribing, polypharmacy, elderly, willingness, quality of life

                Comments

                Comment on this article