29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Usability and preference of electronic vs. paper and pencil OSCE checklists by examiners and influence of checklist type on missed ratings in the Swiss Federal Licensing Exam.

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Only a few studies with small sample sizes have compared electronic Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) rating checklists with traditional paper-based OSCE rating checklists. In this study, the examiner-perceived usability and preference for type of OSCE checklist (electronic vs. paper based) were compared, and the influence of OSCE checklist type on missed ratings was determined, for the Swiss Federal Licensing Examination in clinical skills for human medicine.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods.

          This article puts forward the case that survey questionnaires, which are a type of measuring instrument, can and should be tested to ensure they meet their purpose. Traditionally survey researchers have been pre-occupied with 'standardising' data collection instruments and procedures such as question wording and have assumed that experience in questionnaire design, coupled with pilot testing of questionnaires, will then ensure valid and reliable results. However, implicit in the notion of standardisation are the assumptions that respondents are able to understand the questions being asked, that questions are understood in the same way by all respondents, and that respondents are willing and able to answer such questions. The development of cognitive question testing methods has provided social researchers with a number of theories and tools to test these assumptions, and to develop better survey instruments and questionnaires. This paper describes some of these theories and tools, and argues that cognitive testing should be a standard part of the development process of any survey instrument.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cognitive Load Theory: implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86.

              Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) builds upon established models of human memory that include the subsystems of sensory, working and long-term memory. Working memory (WM) can only process a limited number of information elements at any given time. This constraint creates a "bottleneck" for learning. CLT identifies three types of cognitive load that impact WM: intrinsic load (associated with performing essential aspects of the task), extraneous load (associated with non-essential aspects of the task) and germane load (associated with the deliberate use of cognitive strategies that facilitate learning). When the cognitive load associated with a task exceeds the learner's WM capacity, performance and learning is impaired. To facilitate learning, CLT researchers have developed instructional techniques that decrease extraneous load (e.g. worked examples), titrate intrinsic load to the developmental stage of the learner (e.g. simplify task without decontextualizing) and ensure that unused WM capacity is dedicated to germane load, i.e. cognitive learning strategies. A number of instructional techniques have been empirically tested. As learners' progress, curricula must also attend to the expertise-reversal effect. Instructional techniques that facilitate learning among early learners may not help and may even interfere with learning among more advanced learners. CLT has particular relevance to medical education because many of the professional activities to be learned require the simultaneous integration of multiple and varied sets of knowledge, skills and behaviors at a specific time and place. These activities possess high "element interactivity" and therefore impose a cognitive load that may surpass the WM capacity of the learner. Applications to various medical education settings (classroom, workplace and self-directed learning) are explored.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                GMS J Med Educ
                GMS journal for medical education
                2366-5017
                2366-5017
                2022
                : 39
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1 ] University of Bern, Institute for Medical Education, Department for Assessment and Evaluation, Bern, Switzerland.
                [2 ] University of Bern, Institute for Medical Education, Department for Software Development, Usability Consulting and IT Infrastructure, Bern, Switzerland.
                [3 ] University of Bern, Institute for Medical Education, Bern, Switzerland.
                Article
                zma001545
                10.3205/zma001545
                9174065
                35692359
                bce63f3e-bae3-48b5-82d2-8eee8cea9ea9
                History

                OSCE,usability,national,evaluation,electronic,checklists
                OSCE, usability, national, evaluation, electronic, checklists

                Comments

                Comment on this article