1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ‘Is it in your basic personality?’ Negotiations about traits and context in diagnostic interviews for personality disorders

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          What does it mean to claim that somebody’s personality is disordered? The aim in this paper is to examine how the process of diagnosing personality disorders (PD) unfolds on a practical level. We take an in-depth look at PD interviews, paying close attention to the occasional discrepancies in the clinicians’ and the patients’ approaches to generalising the behaviour of patients to describe their personality. Clinicians are guided by the medical model and structured interviews in their approach. We regard the interview situation as interplay between the institution, the clinician and the patient – and the final diagnosis as an interactional construction between them. Our data consists of video-recorded interviews in Finland with 10 adult patients and three psychiatric nurses. The collection was compiled from 22 excerpts in which the participants orient differently to the generalisability of personality traits. Our observations show that, in these interviews, patients frequently make sense of their behaviour differently from what is expected – not as a reflection of their personality traits, but as an outcome of many situational factors. Our understanding leads us to emphasise the importance of making visible the practices that shape the diagnostic process in psychiatry.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor-patient communication in general practice.

          Mishler (The discourse of medicine. The dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex), applying Habermas's theory of Communicative Action to medical encounters. showed how the struggle between the voice of medicine and the voice of the lifeworld fragmented and suppressed patients' multi-faceted, contextualised and meaningful accounts. This paper investigates and critiques Mishler's premise that this results in inhumane, ineffective medical care. Using a more complex data collection strategy, comprising patient interviews, doctor interviews and transcribed consultations we show more complex relations than emerged from Mishler's analysis. We found four communication patterns across 35 general practice case studies. When doctor and patient both used the voice of medicine exclusively (acute physical complaints) this worked for simple unitary problems (Strictly Medicine). When both doctor and patient engaged with the lifeworld, more of the agenda was voiced (Mutual Lifeworld) and patients were recognised as unique human beings (psychological plus physical problems). Poorest outcomes occurred where patients used the voice of the lifeworld but were ignored (Lifeworld Ignored) or blocked (Lifeworld Blocked) by doctors' use of voice of medicine (chronic physical complaints). The analysis supports the premise that increased use of the lifeworld makes for better outcomes and more humane treatment of patients as unique human beings. Some doctors switched communication strategies in different consultations, which suggests that their behaviour might be open to change. If doctors could be sensitised to the importance of dealing with the concerns of the lifeworld for patients with chronic physical conditions as well as psychological conditions, it might be possible to obtain better care for patients. This would require attention to structural aspects of the healthcare system to enable doctors to work fully within the patient-centred model.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5

            (2013)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Borderline personality disorder, complex trauma, and problems with self and identity: A social‐communicative approach

              Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a relatively highly prevalent psychiatric disorder that is associated with very high personal and socioeconomic costs. This paper provides a state-of-the-art review of the relationship between complex trauma and key features of BPD, with a focus on problems with self-coherence and self-continuity. We first review evidence for the high prevalence of complex trauma in BPD patients. This is followed by a discussion of emerging knowledge concerning the biobehavioral mechanisms involved in problems related to self and identity in BPD. We emphasize three biobehavioral systems that are affected by complex trauma and are centrally implicated in identify diffusion in BPD: the attachment system, mentalizing or social cognition, and the capacity for epistemic trust-that is, an openness to the reception of social communication that is personally relevant and of generalizable significance. We formulate a new approach to personality and severe personality disorders, and to problems with self and identity in these disorders, rooted in a social-communicative understanding of the foundations of selfhood. We also discuss how extant evidence-based treatments address the above-mentioned biobehavioral systems involved in identity diffusion in BPD and related disorders, and the supporting evidence. We close the paper with recommendations for future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Health (London)
                Health (London)
                HEA
                sphea
                Health (London, England : 1997)
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1363-4593
                1461-7196
                24 May 2022
                November 2023
                : 27
                : 6
                : 1033-1058
                Affiliations
                [1-13634593221094701]University of Helsinki, Finland
                [2-13634593221094701]University of Helsinki, Finland
                [3-13634593221094701]University of Helsinki, Finland; Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, Germany
                Author notes
                [*]Maarit Lehtinen, University of Helsinki, Siltavuorenpenger 1 A, Helsinki 00014, Finland. Email: maarit.x.lehtinen@ 123456helsinki.fi
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-0334
                Article
                10.1177_13634593221094701
                10.1177/13634593221094701
                10588267
                35608173
                098bc6c3-2d70-4cdf-b38a-79e940d3dbda
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Koneen Säätiö, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100005781;
                Award ID: 201802533
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                Medicine
                clinician-patient interaction,conversation analysis,discursive psychology,personality disorders,psychiatric interview

                Comments

                Comment on this article