152
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Drosophila Eyes Absent Is Required for Normal Cone and Pigment Cell Development

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In Drosophila, development of the compound eye is orchestrated by a network of highly conserved transcriptional regulators known as the retinal determination (RD) network. The retinal determination gene eyes absent ( eya) is expressed in most cells within the developing eye field, from undifferentiated retinal progenitors to photoreceptor cells whose differentiation begins at the morphogenetic furrow (MF). Loss of eya expression leads to an early block in retinal development, making it impossible to study the role of eya expression during later steps of retinal differentiation. We have identified two new regulatory regions that control eya expression during retinal development. These two enhancers are necessary to maintain eya expression anterior to the MF ( eya-IAM) and in photoreceptors ( eya-PSE), respectively. We find that deleting these enhancers affects developmental events anterior to the MF as well as retinal differentiation posterior to the MF. In line with previous results, we find that reducing eya expression anterior to the MF affects several early steps during early retinal differentiation, including cell cycle arrest and expression of the proneural gene ato. Consistent with previous observations that suggest a role for eya in cell proliferation during early development we find that deletion of eya-IAM leads to a marked reduction in the size of the adult retinal field. On the other hand, deletion of eya-PSE leads to defects in cone and pigment cell development. In addition we find that eya expression is necessary to activate expression of the cone cell marker Cut and to regulate levels of the Hedgehog pathway effector Ci. In summary, our study uncovers novel aspects of eya-mediated regulation of eye development. The genetic tools generated in this study will allow for a detailed study of how the RD network regulates key steps in eye formation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          P[acman]: a BAC transgenic platform for targeted insertion of large DNA fragments in D. melanogaster.

          We describe a transgenesis platform for Drosophila melanogaster that integrates three recently developed technologies: a conditionally amplifiable bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC), recombineering, and bacteriophage PhiC31-mediated transgenesis. The BAC is maintained at low copy number, facilitating plasmid maintenance and recombineering, but is induced to high copy number for plasmid isolation. Recombineering allows gap repair and mutagenesis in bacteria. Gap repair efficiently retrieves DNA fragments up to 133 kilobases long from P1 or BAC clones. PhiC31-mediated transgenesis integrates these large DNA fragments at specific sites in the genome, allowing the rescue of lethal mutations in the corresponding genes. This transgenesis platform should greatly facilitate structure/function analyses of most Drosophila genes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The generation of chromosomal deletions to provide extensive coverage and subdivision of the Drosophila melanogaster genome

            Background Chromosomal deletions are used extensively in Drosophila melanogaster genetics research. Deletion mapping is the primary method used for fine-scale gene localization. Effective and efficient deletion mapping requires both extensive genomic coverage and a high density of molecularly defined breakpoints across the genome. Results A large-scale resource development project at the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center has improved the choice of deletions beyond that provided by previous projects. FLP-mediated recombination between FRT-bearing transposon insertions was used to generate deletions, because it is efficient and provides single-nucleotide resolution in planning deletion screens. The 793 deletions generated pushed coverage of the euchromatic genome to 98.4%. Gaps in coverage contain haplolethal and haplosterile genes, but the sizes of these gaps were minimized by flanking these genes as closely as possible with deletions. In improving coverage, a complete inventory of haplolethal and haplosterile genes was generated and extensive information on other haploinsufficient genes was compiled. To aid mapping experiments, a subset of deletions was organized into a Deficiency Kit to provide maximal coverage efficiently. To improve the resolution of deletion mapping, screens were planned to distribute deletion breakpoints evenly across the genome. The median chromosomal interval between breakpoints now contains only nine genes and 377 intervals contain only single genes. Conclusions Drosophila melanogaster now has the most extensive genomic deletion coverage and breakpoint subdivision as well as the most comprehensive inventory of haploinsufficient genes of any multicellular organism. The improved selection of chromosomal deletion strains will be useful to nearly all Drosophila researchers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The eye-specification proteins So and Eya form a complex and regulate multiple steps in Drosophila eye development.

              Sine oculis (so) and eyes absent (eya) are required for Drosophila eye development and are founding members of the mammalian Six and Eya gene families. These genes have been proposed to act with eyeless (Pax6) to regulate eye development in vertebrates and invertebrates. so encodes a highly diverged homeobox transcription factor and eya encodes a novel nuclear protein. We demonstrate that So and Eya (1) regulate common steps in eye development including cell proliferation, patterning, and neuronal development; (2) synergize in inducing ectopic eyes; and (3) interact in yeast and in vitro through evolutionarily conserved domains. We propose that an So/Eya complex regulates multiple steps in eye development and functions within the context of a network of genes to specify eye tissue identity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                24 July 2014
                : 9
                : 7
                : e102143
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
                [2 ]Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
                [3 ]Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
                [4 ]Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
                [5 ]Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
                [6 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
                [7 ]Program in Cell and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
                Indiana University, United States of America
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: UCK RC GM. Performed the experiments: UCK MJ SK. Analyzed the data: UCK MJ SK GM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: UCK BJ MJ SK. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: UCK BJ GM.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-17935
                10.1371/journal.pone.0102143
                4109927
                25057928
                dff1aea9-0e21-4d1c-b0a4-5fee45efd2df
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 21 April 2014
                : 14 June 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                This study was supported by the Retina Research Foundation ( http://retinaresearchfnd.org/), the National Eye Institute (NEI) ( www.nei.nih.gov) grant R01 EY011232 and the NEI/National Institutes of Health Core Grant for Vision Research EY-002520. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and life sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Molecular Development
                Morphogens
                Organism Development
                Organogenesis
                Sense Organ Development
                Eye Development
                Cell Fate Determination
                Genetics
                Animal Genetics
                Invertebrate Genetics
                DNA
                Promoter Regions
                Gene Expression
                Gene Regulation
                Enhancer Elements
                Transcription Factors
                Gene Identification and Analysis
                Genetic Complementation
                Genetics of Disease
                Genetic Disorders
                Gene Function
                Gene Regulatory Networks
                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology techniques
                Artificial Genetic Recombination
                Artificial Site-Specific Recombination
                DNA construction
                DNA manipulations
                Recombinant DNA technology
                Custom metadata
                The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article