1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Diagnosis, management, and outcome of cardiac sarcoidosis and giant cell myocarditis: a Swedish single center experience

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and giant cell myocarditis (GCM) are rare diseases that share some similarities, but also display different clinical and histopathological features. We aimed to compare the demographics, clinical presentation, and outcome of patients diagnosed with CS or GCM.

          Method

          We compared the clinical data and outcome of all adult patients with CS (n = 71) or GCM (n = 21) diagnosed at our center between 1991 and 2020.

          Results

          The median (interquartile range) follow-up time for patients with CS and GCM was 33.5 [6.5–60.9] and 2.98 [0.6–40.9] months, respectively. In the entire cohort, heart failure (HF) was the most common presenting manifestation (31%), followed by ventricular arrhythmias (25%). At presentation, a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 50% was found in 54% of the CS compared to 86% of the GCM patients ( P = 0.014), while corresponding proportions for right ventricular dysfunction were 24% and 52% ( P = 0.026), respectively. Advanced HF (NYHA ≥ IIIB) was less common in CS (31%) than in GCM (76%). CS patients displayed significantly lower circulating levels of natriuretic peptides ( P < 0.001) and troponins ( P = 0.014). Eighteen percent of patients with CS included in the survival analysis reached the composite endpoint of death or heart transplantation (HTx) compared to 68% of patients with GCM ( P < 0.001).

          Conclusion

          GCM has a more fulminant clinical course than CS with severe biventricular failure, higher levels of circulating biomarkers and an increased need for HTx. The histopathologic diagnosis remained key determinant even after adjustment for markers of cardiac dysfunction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            HRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Management of Acute Myocarditis and Chronic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy

              Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
                BMC Cardiovasc Disord
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1471-2261
                December 2022
                April 26 2022
                December 2022
                : 22
                : 1
                Article
                10.1186/s12872-022-02639-0
                5675fb31-940b-46c7-aa68-f8288149ac46
                © 2022

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article