1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Developing the Ready Military Medical Force: military-specific training in Graduate Medical Education

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Graduate Medical Education plays a critical role in training the next generation of military physicians, ensuring they are ready to uphold the dual professional requirements inherent to being both a military officer and a military physician. This involves executing the operational duties as a commissioned leader while also providing exceptional medical care in austere environments and in harm’s way. The purpose of this study is to review prior efforts at developing and implementing military unique curricula (MUC) in residency training programs.

          Methods

          We performed a literature search in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Web of Science, and the Defense Technical Information Center through August 8, 2023, including terms “graduate medical education” and “military.” We included articles if they specifically addressed military curricula in residency with terms including “residency and operational” or “readiness training”, “military program”, or “military curriculum”.

          Results

          We identified 1455 articles based on title and abstract initially and fully reviewed 111. We determined that 64 articles met our inclusion criteria by describing the history or context of MUC, surveys supporting MUC, or military programs or curricula incorporated into residency training or military-specific residency programs.

          Conclusion

          We found that although there have been multiple attempts at establishing MUC across training programs, it is difficult to create a uniform curriculum that can be implemented to train residents to a single standard across services and specialties.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Leadership Training in Graduate Medical Education: Time for a Requirement?

          The need for all physicians to function as leaders in their various roles is becoming more widely recognized. There are increasing opportunities for physicians at all levels including Graduate Medical Education (GME) to gain leadership skills, but most of these opportunities are only for those interested. Although not an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirement, some US graduate medical education programs have incorporated leadership training into their curricula. Interestingly, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada adopted the Leader role in its 2015 CanMEDS physician training model and requires leadership training. We sought to understand the value of a leadership training program in residency in our institution.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Moving Beyond Accidental Leadership: A Graduate Medical Education Leadership Curriculum Needs Assessment.

            Despite calls for greater physician leadership, few medical schools, and graduate medical education programs provide explicit training on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to be an effective physician leader. Rather, most leaders develop through what has been labeled "accidental leadership." A survey was conducted at Walter Reed to define the current status of leadership development and determine what learners and faculty perceived as key components of a leadership curriculum.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mild traumatic brain injury screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

              The majority of combat-related traumatic brain injury (TBI) within the U.S. Armed Forces is mild TBI (mTBI). This article focuses specifically on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment aspects of mTBI within the military community. Aggressive screening measures were instituted in 2006 to ensure that the mTBI population is identified and treated. Screenings occur in-theater, outside the contiguous United States, and in-garrison. We discuss specific screening procedures at each screening setting. Current diagnosis of mTBI is based upon self-report or through witnesses to the event. TBI severity is determined by specific Department of Defense criteria. Abundant clinician resources are available for mTBI in the military health care setting. Education resources for both the patient and the clinician are discussed in detail. An evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the care of mTBI was created through collaborative efforts of the DoD and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Although symptoms following mTBI generally resolve with time, active treatment is centered on symptom management, supervised rest, recovery, and patient education. Medical specialty care, ancillary services, and other therapeutic services may be required.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Trauma Surg Acute Care Open
                Trauma Surg Acute Care Open
                tsaco
                tsaco
                Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2397-5776
                2024
                21 February 2024
                : 9
                : 1
                : e001302
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentSurgery , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama, USA
                [2 ] Ringgold_1023US Department of the Army , Washington, District of Columbia, USA
                [3 ] Ringgold_8381US Department of the Navy , Washington, District of Columbia, USA
                [4 ] departmentSurgery , University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
                [5 ] departmentDefense Committees on Trauma , Ringgold_568878Joint Trauma System , JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
                [6 ] departmentDepartment of Surgery , Ringgold_588014San Antonio Military Health System , San Antonio, Texas, USA
                [7 ] Ringgold_1685Uniformed Services University , Bethesda, Maryland, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Emily W Baird; ewbaird@ 123456uabmc.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0128-7643
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-1710
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7368-1124
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-4398
                Article
                tsaco-2023-001302
                10.1136/tsaco-2023-001302
                10882335
                38390471
                57f29e3a-2166-459d-9fd7-3ef9eb4582ea
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 01 November 2023
                : 29 January 2024
                Categories
                Review
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                graduate medical education
                graduate medical education

                Comments

                Comment on this article