15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adaptation and testing of psychosocial assessment instruments for cross-cultural use: an example from the Thailand Burma border

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The purpose of this study was to develop valid and reliable instruments to assess priority psychosocial problems and functioning among adult survivors of systematic violence from Burma living in Thailand.

          Methods

          The process involved four steps: 1) instrument drafting and piloting; 2) reliability and validity testing; 3) instrument revision; and 4) retesting revised instrument.

          Results

          A total of N = 158 interviews were completed. Overall subscales showed good internal consistency (0.73-0.92) and satisfactory combined test-retest/inter rater reliability (0.63-0.84). Criterion validity, was not demonstrated for any scale. The alcohol and functioning scales underperformed and were revised (step 3) and retested (step 4). Upon retesting, the function scale showed good internal consistency reliability (0.91-0.92), and the alcohol scale showed acceptable internal consistency (0.79) and strong test-retest/inter-rater reliability (0.86-0.89).

          Conclusions

          This paper describes the importance and process of adaptation and testing, illustrated by the experiences and results for selected instruments in this population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Common mental disorders in postconflict settings.

          Research into postconflict psychiatric sequelae in low-income countries has been focused largely on symptoms rather than on full psychiatric diagnostic assessment. We assessed 3048 respondents from postconflict communities in Algeria, Cambodia, Ethiopia, and Palestine with the aim of establishing the prevalence of mood disorder, somatoform disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and other anxiety disorders. PTSD and other anxiety disorders were the most frequent problems. In three countries, PTSD was the most likely disorder in individuals exposed to violence associated with armed conflict, but such violence was a common risk factor for various disorders and comorbidity combinations in different settings. In three countries, anxiety disorder was reported most in people who had not been exposed to such violence. Experience of violence associated with armed conflict was associated with higher rates of disorder that ranged from a risk ratio of 2.10 (95% CI 1.38-2.85) for anxiety in Algeria to 10.03 (5.26-16.65) for PTSD in Palestine. Postconflict mental health programmes should address a range of common disorders beyond PTSD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Symptoms of emotional distress in a family planning service: stability over a four-week period.

            The 25-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist ( HSCL -25) was used on two occasions four weeks apart to identify self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients attending a family planning service. Only 28 per cent of patients classified as anxious to start with remained so four weeks later, but 62 per cent of those with high depression scores and 74 per cent of those with high depression and high anxiety scores maintained significant levels of depression. The implications of these findings for routine screening are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of depression prevalence in rural Uganda using symptom and function criteria.

              We sought to assess the prevalence of major depression in a region of sub-Saharan Africa severely affected by HIV, using symptom and functional criteria as measured with locally validated instruments. Six hundred homes in the Masaka and Rakai districts of southwest Uganda were selected by weighted systematic random sampling. A locally validated version of the depression section of the Hopkins Symptom Check List (DHSCL) and a community-generated index of functional impairment were used to interview 587 respondents. Of respondents, 21% were diagnosed with depression using three of the five DSM-IV criteria (including function impairment) compared with 24.4% using symptom criteria alone. Increased age and lower educational levels are associated with a greater risk for depression; however, a gender effect was not detected. Most community-based assessments of depression in sub-Saharan Africa based on the DSM-IV have used symptom criteria only. We found that expanding criteria to more closely match the complete DSM-IV is feasible, thereby making more accurate assessments of prevalence possible. This approach suggests that major depression and associated functional impairment are a substantial problem in this population.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                eharoz1@jhu.edu
                jbass1@jhu.edu
                clee147@jhu.edu
                lmurra15@jhu.edu
                court.robinson@jhu.edu
                pbolton1@jhu.edu
                Journal
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2050-7283
                31 August 2014
                31 August 2014
                2014
                : 2
                : 1
                : 31
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Room 780, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
                [ ]Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA
                Article
                31
                10.1186/s40359-014-0031-6
                4317135
                4d97a261-08f6-4ef7-9eae-3bdf4e7d7bbf
                © Haroz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 December 2013
                : 19 August 2014
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                validation,refugee,psychometrics,instrument development
                validation, refugee, psychometrics, instrument development

                Comments

                Comment on this article