7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Blue–green water utilization in rice–fish cultivation towards sustainable food production

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Integrated rice–fish culture is a competitive alternative to rice monoculture for environmental sustainability and food productivity. Compared to rice monoculture, rearing fish in rice field ecosystems could increase food (rice and fish) production from this coculture. Moreover, the water productivity of rice–fish coculture is considerably higher than that of rice monoculture, because of double cropping. Despite these benefits, rice–fish coculture has not yet been broadly practiced. One of the potential challenges for the wider adoption of rice–fish coculture is water management. There are two forms of water involved in rice–fish cultivation: (1) blue water–surface and groundwater, and (2) green water–soil water from rainfall. The aim of this article is to focus on key factors determining the adoption of rice–fish cultivation through the effective utilization of blue–green water. We suggest that the efficient application of blue and green water in rice–fish coculture could help confronting water scarcity, reducing water footprint, and increasing water productivity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references115

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.

          Continuing population and consumption growth will mean that the global demand for food will increase for at least another 40 years. Growing competition for land, water, and energy, in addition to the overexploitation of fisheries, will affect our ability to produce food, as will the urgent requirement to reduce the impact of the food system on the environment. The effects of climate change are a further threat. But the world can produce more food and can ensure that it is used more efficiently and equitably. A multifaceted and linked global strategy is needed to ensure sustainable and equitable food security, different components of which are explored here.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The water footprint of humanity.

              This study quantifies and maps the water footprint (WF) of humanity at a high spatial resolution. It reports on consumptive use of rainwater (green WF) and ground and surface water (blue WF) and volumes of water polluted (gray WF). Water footprints are estimated per nation from both a production and consumption perspective. International virtual water flows are estimated based on trade in agricultural and industrial commodities. The global annual average WF in the period 1996-2005 was 9,087 Gm(3)/y (74% green, 11% blue, 15% gray). Agricultural production contributes 92%. About one-fifth of the global WF relates to production for export. The total volume of international virtual water flows related to trade in agricultural and industrial products was 2,320 Gm(3)/y (68% green, 13% blue, 19% gray). The WF of the global average consumer was 1,385 m(3)/y. The average consumer in the United States has a WF of 2,842 m(3)/y, whereas the average citizens in China and India have WFs of 1,071 and 1,089 m(3)/y, respectively. Consumption of cereal products gives the largest contribution to the WF of the average consumer (27%), followed by meat (22%) and milk products (7%). The volume and pattern of consumption and the WF per ton of product of the products consumed are the main factors determining the WF of a consumer. The study illustrates the global dimension of water consumption and pollution by showing that several countries heavily rely on foreign water resources and that many countries have significant impacts on water consumption and pollution elsewhere.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                n.ahmed@deakin.edu.au , nesar.ahmed@dfo-mpo.gc.ca
                j.hornbuckle@deakin.edu.au
                giovanni.turchini@deakin.edu.au
                Journal
                Ambio
                Ambio
                Ambio
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0044-7447
                1654-7209
                4 March 2022
                4 March 2022
                September 2022
                : 51
                : 9
                : 1933-1948
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1021.2, ISNI 0000 0001 0526 7079, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, , Deakin University, ; Burwood, VIC 3125 Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.1021.2, ISNI 0000 0001 0526 7079, Centre for Regional and Rural Futures, , Deakin University, ; Griffith, Hanwood, NSW 2680 Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-697X
                Article
                1711
                10.1007/s13280-022-01711-5
                9287512
                35244893
                59ae5a53-2a61-4924-bf9b-0dfaca815fd1
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 8 April 2021
                : 15 September 2021
                : 3 February 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Deakin University
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2022

                Sociology
                environmental sustainability,food production,integrated farming,rainwater,water efficiency

                Comments

                Comment on this article