Single-pass carbon dioxide versus multiple-pass Er:YAG laser skin resurfacing: a comparison of postoperative wound healing and side-effect rates.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Ablative laser skin resurfacing with carbon dioxide (CO2) and erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) lasers has been popularized in recent years and their side effects individually reported. No prior study, however, has directly compared the relative healing times and complications rates between the two different systems.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Dermatol Surg

Title: Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]

Publisher: Wiley

ISSN: 1076-0512

ISSN (Print): 1076-0512

Publication date (Electronic): Jan 2003

Volume: 29

Issue: 1

Affiliations

[1 ] Washington Institute of Dermatologic Laser Surgery, Washington, DC 20037, USA.

Article

Publisher Item ID: 29012

DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29012.x

PubMed ID: 12534517

SO-VID: 1f1971b0-996d-411c-9099-7fedb2a3262b

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Cited by 12

See all cited by

- Version 1