For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
14
views
45
references
 Top references
cited by
2
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      151
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Belarusian Healthcare Professionals' Views on Monkeypox and Vaccine Hesitancy.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite the low transmission risk of Monkeypox (mpox) in Belarus, this study is vital as it contributes to our understanding of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals (HCPs). It aims to assess vaccination perceptions and evaluate the willingness to pay for the vaccine among Belarusian HCPs, thereby enhancing pandemic preparedness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

          (2013)
          Article 0 comments Cited 6072 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Health Belief Model and Preventive Health Behavior

            Irwin Rosenstock (1974)
            Article 0 comments Cited 433 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

              Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger … (2007)
              Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
              Article 0 comments Cited 393 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Vaccines (Basel)
                Title: Vaccines
                Publisher: MDPI AG
                ISSN: 2076-393X
                ISSN (Print): 2076-393X
                Publication date (Electronic): Aug 15 2023
                Volume: 11
                Issue: 8
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
                [2 ] Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic (IHIS-CR), 128 01 Prague, Czech Republic.
                [3 ] Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
                [4 ] Medical Center of Modern Pediatrics, Chervyakova Str. 55, 220053 Minsk, Belarus.
                [5 ] Bausch Health LLC, Olshevskogo Str. 22, 220073 Minsk, Belarus.
                Article
                Publisher Item ID: vaccines11081368
                DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11081368
                PMC ID: 10459544
                PubMed ID: 37631936
                SO-VID: aeb6ceb1-e38a-448a-84d1-8bf95d13102c
                History

                Keywords: vaccination hesitancy,Republic of Belarus,cross-sectional studies,disease outbreaks,health belief model,health personnel,knowledge,monkeypox,smallpox vaccine
                Data availability:
                Keywords: vaccination hesitancy, Republic of Belarus, cross-sectional studies, disease outbreaks, health belief model, health personnel, knowledge, monkeypox, smallpox vaccine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content151

                See all similar

                Cited by2

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors846

                See all reference authors