12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Politics of Vigilantism

      1
      Comparative Political Studies
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Vigilantism is theoretically and empirically important for political science, because it is closely related to core concepts like power, order, state-building, and collective action. Yet although political scientists are increasingly interested in vigilantism, our discipline has never developed a sustained, cumulative research agenda on vigilantism. I argue this is largely because existing definitions of vigilantism are contradictory, tautological, and not easily operationalized. This article cuts through the conceptual muddle, equipping and motivating political scientists to study vigilantism. First, I define vigilantism as the extralegal prevention, investigation, or punishment of offenses. Next, I provide a crisp conceptualization of vigilantism, and I situate vigilantism in relation to other concepts in political science. I conclude by addressing methodological and ethical issues in the study of vigilantism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references88

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The concept of power

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics

            “To have mastered ‘theory’ and ‘method’ is to have become aconscious thinker, a man at work and aware of the assumptions and implications of whatever he is about. To be mastered by ‘method’ or ‘theory’ is simply to be kept from working.” The sentence applies nicely to the present plight of political science. The profession as a whole oscillates between two unsound extremes. At the one end a large majority of political scientists qualify as pure and simple unconscious thinkers. At the other end a sophisticated minority qualify as overconscious thinkers, in the sense that their standards of method and theory are drawn from the physical, “paradigmatic” sciences.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Two Faces of Power

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Comparative Political Studies
                Comparative Political Studies
                SAGE Publications
                0010-4140
                1552-3829
                May 2021
                September 21 2020
                May 2021
                : 54
                : 6
                : 923-955
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
                Article
                10.1177/0010414020957692
                22e45fa5-d34f-44af-8808-b1fb655da18e
                © 2021

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article