27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics

      American Political Science Review
      JSTOR

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          “To have mastered ‘theory’ and ‘method’ is to have become aconscious thinker, a man at work and aware of the assumptions and implications of whatever he is about. To be mastered by ‘method’ or ‘theory’ is simply to be kept from working.” The sentence applies nicely to the present plight of political science. The profession as a whole oscillates between two unsound extremes. At the one end a large majority of political scientists qualify as pure and simple unconscious thinkers. At the other end a sophisticated minority qualify as overconscious thinkers, in the sense that their standards of method and theory are drawn from the physical, “paradigmatic” sciences.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          applab
          American Political Science Review
          Am Polit Sci Rev
          JSTOR
          0003-0554
          1537-5943
          December 1970
          August 2014
          : 64
          : 04
          : 1033-1053
          Article
          10.2307/1958356
          05aef93e-d527-49b4-8bac-0d966ff7edff
          © 1970
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article