47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Digital health technology (DHT) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery but its uptake has been low in clinical and research settings. The factors that contribute to the limited adoption of DHT, particularly in cardiovascular settings, are unclear. The objective of this review was to determine the barriers and facilitators of DHT uptake from the perspective of patients, clinicians, and researchers. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for studies published from inception to May 2020 that reported barriers and/or facilitators of DHT adoption in cardiovascular care. We extracted data on study design, setting, cardiovascular condition, and type of DHT. We conducted a thematic analysis to identify barriers and facilitators of DHT uptake. The search identified 3075 unique studies, of which 29 studies met eligibility criteria. Studies employed: qualitative methods ( n = 13), which included interviews and focus groups; quantitative methods ( n = 5), which included surveys; or a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods ( n = 11). Twenty-five studies reported patient-level barriers, most common of which were difficult-to-use technology ( n=7) and a poor internet connection ( n=7). Six studies reported clinician-level barriers, which included increased workload ( n=4) and a lack of integration with electronic medical records ( n=3).Twenty-four studies reported patient-level facilitators, which included improved communication with clinicians ( n=10) and personalized technology ( n=6). Four studies reported clinician-level facilitators, which included approval and organizational support from cardiology departments and/or hospitals ( n=3) and technologies that improved efficiency ( n=3). No studies reported researcher-level barriers or facilitators. In summary, internet access, user-friendliness, organizational support, workflow efficiency, and data integration were reported as important factors in the uptake of DHT by patients and clinicians. These factors can be considered when selecting and implementing DHTs in cardiovascular clinical settings.

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The theory of planned behavior

          Icek Ajzen (1991)
          Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

            Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Eur Heart J Digit Health
                Eur Heart J Digit Health
                ehjdh
                European Heart Journal. Digital Health
                Oxford University Press
                2634-3916
                March 2021
                04 February 2021
                04 February 2021
                : 2
                : 1
                : 62-74
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University , 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8, Canada
                [2 ] Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University , Hamilton, Canada
                [3 ] Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester , Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
                [4 ] Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Newcastle ST5 5BG , UK
                [5 ] Faculty of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ , UK
                [6 ] Department of Medicine, McMaster University , 20 Copeland Avenue, David Braley Research Building, Suite C3-117, Hamilton, ON L8L 0A3, Canada
                [7 ] Population Health Research Institute, 20 Copeland Ave, Hamilton , Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
                [8 ] ICES, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton , Ontario L8S 4L8, Canada
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. Tel: +1 905 521 2100, ext: 40601, Fax: +1 905 297 3785, Email: harriette.vanspall@ 123456phri.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7457-2552
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-4569
                Article
                ztab005
                10.1093/ehjdh/ztab005
                8139413
                8c5c03c5-cb37-4947-88c9-e8468a7b68cc
                The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 17 December 2020
                : 12 January 2021
                : 19 January 2021
                : 24 January 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 13
                Funding
                Funded by: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, DOI 10.13039/501100000024;
                Funded by: McMaster University Department of Medicine and Women As One Escalator Award;
                Categories
                Review

                digital health technology,barriers,facilitators,cardiology,cardiovascular disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article