6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Community‐led HIV testing services including HIV self‐testing and assisted partner notification services in Vietnam: lessons from a pilot study in a concentrated epidemic setting

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The HIV epidemic in Vietnam is concentrated in key populations and their partners – people who inject drugs, men who have sex with men, sex workers and partners of people living with HIV. These groups have poor access to and uptake of conventional HIV testing services ( HTS). To address this gap, lay provider‐ and self‐testing and assisted partner notification ( aPN) were introduced and delivered by the community. We explored the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing aPN as part of community testing services for key populations.

          Methods

          Lay provider testing and self‐testing was started in January 2017, and targeted key populations and their partners. Since July 2017, aPN was introduced. HTS was offered at drop‐in houses or coffee shops in Thai Nguyen and Can Tho provinces. All self‐testing was assisted and observed by peer educators. Both in‐person and social network methods were used to mobilize key populations to test for HIV and offer HTS to partners of people living with HIV. Client‐level data, including demographic information and self‐reported risk behaviour, were collected on site by peer educators.

          Results

          Between January 2017 and May 2018, 3978 persons from key populations were tested through community‐led HTS; 66.7% were first‐time testers. Of the 3978 clients, 3086 received HTS from a lay provider and 892 self‐tested in the presence of a lay provider. Overall, 245 (6.2% of tested clients) had reactive results, 231 (94.3%) were confirmed to be HIV positive; 215/231 (93.1%) initiated antiretroviral therapy ( ART). Of 231 adult HIV‐positive clients, 186 (80.5%) were provided voluntary aPN, and 105 of their partners were contacted and received HTS. The ratio of partners who tested for HIV per index client was 0.56. Forty‐four (41.9%) partners of index clients receiving HTS were diagnosed with HIV, 97.7% initiated ART during the study period. No social harm was identified or reported.

          Conclusions

          Including aPN as part of community‐led HTS for key populations and their partners is feasible and effective, particularly for reaching first‐time testers and undiagnosed HIV clients. Scale‐up of aPN within community‐led HTS for key populations is essential for achieving the United Nations 90‐90‐90 targets in Vietnam.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Assisted partner services for HIV in Kenya: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

          Assisted partner services for index patients with HIV infections involves elicitation of information about sex partners and contacting them to ensure that they test for HIV and link to care. Assisted partner services are not widely available in Africa. We aimed to establish whether or not assisted partner services increase HIV testing, diagnoses, and linkage to care among sex partners of people with HIV infections in Kenya.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            HIV partner notification is effective and feasible in sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities for HIV treatment and prevention.

            Sexual partners of persons with newly diagnosed HIV infection require HIV counseling, testing and, if necessary, evaluation for therapy. However, many African countries do not have a standardized protocol for partner notification, and the effectiveness of partner notification has not been evaluated in developing countries . Individuals with newly diagnosed HIV infection presenting to sexually transmitted infection clinics in Lilongwe, Malawi, were randomized to 1 of 3 methods of partner notification: passive referral, contract referral, or provider referral. The passive referral group was responsible for notifying their partners themselves. The contract referral group was given seven days to notify their partners, after which a health care provider contacted partners who had not reported for counseling and testing. In the provider referral group, a health care provider notified partners directly. Two hundred forty-five index patients named 302 sexual partners and provided locator information for 252. Among locatable partners, 107 returned for HIV counseling and testing; 20 of 82 [24%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 15% to 34%] partners returned in the passive referral arm, 45 of 88 (51%; 95% CI: 41% to 62%) in the contract referral arm, and 42 of 82 (51%; 95% CI: 40% to 62%) in the provider referral arm (P < 0.001). Among returning partners (n = 107), 67 (64%) of were HIV infected with 54 (81%) newly diagnosed. This study provides the first evidence of the effectiveness of partner notification in sub-Saharan Africa. Active partner notification was feasible, acceptable, and effective among sexually transmitted infections clinic patients. Partner notification will increase early referral to care and facilitate risk reduction among high-risk uninfected partners.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Results of a randomized trial of partner notification in cases of HIV infection in North Carolina.

              We sought to compare two methods of notifying sex partners of subjects infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or persons who had shared needles with them (needle-sharing partners): "patient referral," in which the responsibility for notifying partners was left to the patient, and "provider referral," in which providers attempted to notify partners. Names of sex partners and needle-sharing partners and information on how to locate them were obtained from consenting HIV-infected subjects identified in the HIV-testing programs at three public health departments in North Carolina. The subjects were randomly assigned to a patient-referral group (in which patients had the initial responsibility for notifying their partners) or a provider-referral group (in which the study counselor notified the partners). The success of attempts to notify partners was monitored by means of interviews with counselors conducted both in the field and at the health department. Of 534 HIV-positive persons identified at the health departments, 247 (46 percent) did not return for counseling after the test, 8 were counseled outside the study, and 117 (22 percent) were ineligible. Of the 162 invited to participate, 88 (54 percent) declined and 74 (46 percent) agreed. The subjects were mostly male (69 percent), black (87 percent), homosexual or bisexual (76 percent of the men), and had a median age of 30 years. Thirty-nine were assigned to the provider-referral group and 35 to the patient-referral group. In the provider-referral group 78 of 157 partners (50 percent) were successfully notified, whereas in the patient-referral group only 10 of 153 (7 percent) were notified. Of the partners notified by the counselors, 94 percent were not aware that they had been exposed to HIV. Overall, 23 percent of the partners notified and tested were HIV-positive. In this trial, leaving the notification of partners up to the subjects (patient referral) was quite ineffective, despite the North Carolina law requiring that partners be notified. Partner notification by public health counselors (provider referral) was significantly more effective. Although the effectiveness of notification procedures is constrained by the accuracy of the information provided by HIV-infected patients, counselors who notify the partners of an infected patient can refer them to educational, medical, and support services targeted to persons at high risk for HIV infection and may encourage the adoption of less risky behavior.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nguyenva@who.int
                Journal
                J Int AIDS Soc
                J Int AIDS Soc
                10.1002/(ISSN)1758-2652
                JIA2
                Journal of the International AIDS Society
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1758-2652
                19 July 2019
                July 2019
                : 22
                : Suppl Suppl 3 , The power of partners: Experiences from implementing and scaling‐up HIV partner notification and index testing services, Guest Editors: David A Katz, Vincent J Wong, Amy M Medley, Rachel C Baggaley ( doiID: 10.1002/jia2.2019.22.issue-S3 )
                : e25301
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] World Health Organization, Country Office Hanoi Vietnam
                [ 2 ] Viet Nam Authority for HIV/AIDS Control Hanoi Vietnam
                [ 3 ] Can Tho Provincial AIDS Centre, Vietnam Can Tho City Vietnam
                [ 4 ] Thai Nguyen Provincial AIDS Centre Thai Nguyen City Vietnam
                [ 5 ] National Institute for Hygiene and Epidemiology Hanoi Vietnam
                [ 6 ] HIV Department World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland
                [ 7 ] Clinical Research Department London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] § Corresponding author: Van Thi Thuy Nguyen, WHO, 304 Kim Ma, Ba Dinh District, Hanoi, Vietnam. Tel: +84 2438500314. ( nguyenva@ 123456who.int )
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8766-3082
                Article
                JIA225301
                10.1002/jia2.25301
                6639698
                31321903
                8ec7255f-cf38-4b79-9d2f-45f7b78cd7e4
                © 2019 World Health Organization; licensed by IAS.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or the article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's URL.

                History
                : 11 October 2018
                : 09 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 5, Pages: 9, Words: 7263
                Funding
                Funded by: Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund)
                Funded by: WHO
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jia225301
                July 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.6.2 mode:remove_FC converted:19.07.2019

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                hiv,community,lay provider,self‐testing,partner notification,key and vulnerable populations,vietnam

                Comments

                Comment on this article