9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Efficacy and safety results from CheckMate 140, a phase 2 study of nivolumab for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Nivolumab, an anti–programmed death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, showed promising activity in relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) in a phase 1 study. We conducted a phase 2 trial to further evaluate its efficacy and safety in patients with R/R FL and to explore biomarkers of response. Patients with R/R FL and at least 2 prior lines of therapy, each containing a CD20 antibody or an alkylating agent, were treated with nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent radiologic review committee. Biomarker analyses included gene expression profiling and multiplex immunofluorescence studies of pretreatment tumor samples. A total of 92 patients were treated. After a minimum follow-up of 12 months, ORR was 4% (4 of 92 patients). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-3.6 months). Median duration of response was 11 months (95% CI, 8-14 months). Exploratory analyses suggested that responders had significantly higher proportion of CD3+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment than nonresponders, but no significant differences in PD-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 expression were observed. High expression of a set of tumor-associated macrophage genes was associated with reduced PFS (hazard ratio, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.76-6.11; P = .001). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports of nivolumab. In conclusion, nivolumab monotherapy was associated with very limited activity in patients with R/R FL. Better understanding of the immune biology of this disease may facilitate the development of effective checkpoint-based strategies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02038946.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Tumor and Microenvironment Evolution during Immunotherapy with Nivolumab

          The mechanisms by which immune checkpoint blockade modulates tumor evolution during therapy are unclear. We assessed genomic changes in tumors from 68 patients with advanced melanoma, who progressed on ipilimumab or were ipilimumab-naive, before and after nivolumab initiation (CA209-038 study). Tumors were analyzed by whole-exome, transcriptome, and/or T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing. In responding patients, mutation and neoantigen load were reduced from baseline, and analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity during therapy demonstrated differential clonal evolution within tumors and putative selection against neoantigenic mutations on-therapy. Transcriptome analyses before and during nivolumab therapy revealed increases in distinct immune cell subsets, activation of specific transcriptional networks, and upregulation of immune checkpoint genes that were more pronounced in patients with response. Temporal changes in intratumoral TCR repertoire revealed expansion of T-cell clones in the setting of neoantigen loss. Comprehensive genomic profiling data in this study provide insight into nivolumab mechanism of action. Mutation burden decreases with successful checkpoint blockade therapy in patients with melanoma, suggesting that selection against protective mutant neoepitopes may be a critical mechanism of action of Nivolumab
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma.

            Standardized response criteria are needed to interpret and compare clinical trials and for approval of new therapeutic agents by regulatory agencies. The International Working Group response criteria (Cheson et al, J Clin Oncol 17:1244, 1999) were widely adopted, but required reassessment because of identified limitations and the increased use of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and flow cytometry. The International Harmonization Project was convened to provide updated recommendations. New guidelines are presented incorporating PET, IHC, and flow cytometry for definitions of response in non-Hodgkin's and Hodgkin's lymphoma. Standardized definitions of end points are provided. We hope that these guidelines will be adopted widely by study groups, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, and regulatory agencies to facilitate the development of new and more effective therapies to improve the outcome of patients with lymphoma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nivolumab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancy: Preliminary Results of a Phase Ib Study.

              Cancer cells can exploit the programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint pathway to avoid immune surveillance by modulating T-lymphocyte activity. In part, this may occur through overexpression of PD-1 and PD-1 pathway ligands (PD-L1 and PD-L2) in the tumor microenvironment. PD-1 blockade has produced significant antitumor activity in solid tumors, and similar evidence has emerged in hematologic malignancies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Blood
                American Society of Hematology
                0006-4971
                1528-0020
                February 4 2021
                February 4 2021
                : 137
                : 5
                : 637-645
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA;
                [2 ]Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;
                [3 ]Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy;
                [4 ]Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom;
                [5 ]The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom;
                [6 ]Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA;
                [7 ]Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione Pascale, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Naples, Italy;
                [8 ]Institut Català d'Oncologia–Duran y Reynals, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain;
                [9 ]Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom;
                [10 ]NIHR/CRUK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom;
                [11 ]The Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, United Kingdom;
                [12 ]Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY;
                [13 ]New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY;
                [14 ]Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA;
                [15 ]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA;
                [16 ]Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ; and
                [17 ]Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
                Article
                10.1182/blood.2019004753
                c9bc8d09-77b1-49a8-ac2b-5b42fbbd350a
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article