A Proof to a Hypothesis: Unit Commodity Value Is Directly Proportional to Productivity of Labour

Zhu, Shuyang

doi:10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.9.3.0330

ScienceOpen: research and publishing network

For Publishers

For Researchers

Blog
About

Search
Advanced search

245

views

recommends

If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

The World Review of Political Economy is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals. Furthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

scite_

Smart Citations

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Header Abstract Content Author and article information References Comments

World Review of Political Economy

Volume 9, Issue 3

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

A Proof to a Hypothesis: Unit Commodity Value Is Directly Proportional to Productivity of Labour

Published

research-article

Author(s): Shuyang Zhu

Publication date (Print): 1 October 2018

Journal: World Review of Political Economy

Publisher: Pluto Journals

Keywords: unit commodity value, productivity of labour, inversely-proportional-theory, directly-proportional-theory

Bookmark

Abstract

Content

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (doi): 10.2307/j50005553

Journal ID (jcode): worlrevipoliecon

Title: World Review of Political Economy

Publisher: Pluto Journals

ISSN: 2042-891X

ISSN: 2042-8928

Publication date (Print): 1 October 2018

Volume: 9

Issue: 3 ( doiID: 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.9.issue-3 )

Pages: 330-345

Article

Publisher ID: worlrevipoliecon.9.3.0330

DOI: 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.9.3.0330

SO-VID: 1f523576-d189-4eef-96c7-c03dadbc1d19

License:

All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

History

Custom metadata

lang eng

ScienceOpen disciplines: Political economics

Keywords: unit commodity value,directly-proportional-theory,inversely-proportional-theory,productivity of labour

References

Bai, B. 2002. “Productivity of Labour and the Change of Commodities' Value.” [In Chinese.] Contemporary Economic Research, no. 3: 8–11.
Cheng, E. 2007. “Four Theoretical Hypotheses of the Political Economy of Modern Marxism.” [In Chinese.] Social Sciences in China, no. 1: 16–29, 205.
Feng, J. 2012. “Changes in the Value Quantity of Commodity and Errors in Ideas of ‘In Direct Proportion’.” [In Chinese.] Teaching and Research, no. 5: 27–33.
Feng, J. 2013. “The Non-proportional Relationship between the Magnitude of Unit Commodity Value and Productivity of Labour.” [In Chinese.] The Study of Finance and Economics, no. 8: 28–39.
Guan, Z. 1958. An Introduction to Topological Space. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Science Press.
Lin, G. 2005. “Some Propositions on Socially Necessary Labour and the Relation between Productivity of Labour and Magnitude of Value.” [In Chinese.] Teaching and Research, no. 7: 52–58.
Ma, Y., and E. Cheng. 2002. “A New Probe on ‘Motorial Law of Value Quantity and Productivity of Labour’ of Marx—A Development of the Labour Theory of Value.” [In Chinese.] The Study of Finance and Economics, no. 10: 43–48.
Marx, K. 1972. Collected Works of Marx and Engels. Vol. 23. [In Chinese.] Beijing: People's Publishing House.
Zhu, S. 2013. “Mathematical Analysis of the ‘New Hypothesis on Value Produced on Living Labour’.” [In Chinese.] Studies on Marxism, no. 5: 81–90, 160.

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] Bai, B. 2002. “Productivity of Labour and the Change of Commodities' Value.” [In Chinese.] Contemporary Economic Research, no. 3: 8–11.

[2] Cheng, E. 2007. “Four Theoretical Hypotheses of the Political Economy of Modern Marxism.” [In Chinese.] Social Sciences in China, no. 1: 16–29, 205.

[3] Feng, J. 2012. “Changes in the Value Quantity of Commodity and Errors in Ideas of ‘In Direct Proportion’.” [In Chinese.] Teaching and Research, no. 5: 27–33.

[4] Feng, J. 2013. “The Non-proportional Relationship between the Magnitude of Unit Commodity Value and Productivity of Labour.” [In Chinese.] The Study of Finance and Economics, no. 8: 28–39.

[5] Guan, Z. 1958. An Introduction to Topological Space. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Science Press.

[6] Lin, G. 2005. “Some Propositions on Socially Necessary Labour and the Relation between Productivity of Labour and Magnitude of Value.” [In Chinese.] Teaching and Research, no. 7: 52–58.

[7] Ma, Y., and E. Cheng. 2002. “A New Probe on ‘Motorial Law of Value Quantity and Productivity of Labour’ of Marx—A Development of the Labour Theory of Value.” [In Chinese.] The Study of Finance and Economics, no. 10: 43–48.

[8] Marx, K. 1972. Collected Works of Marx and Engels. Vol. 23. [In Chinese.] Beijing: People's Publishing House.

[9] Zhu, S. 2013. “Mathematical Analysis of the ‘New Hypothesis on Value Produced on Living Labour’.” [In Chinese.] Studies on Marxism, no. 5: 81–90, 160.