Basıc Techniques for External Rhınoplasty

In nose surgery, carved or crushed cartilage used as a graft has some disadvantages, chiefly that it may be perceptible through the nasal skin after tissue resolution is complete. To overcome these problems and to obtain a smoother surface, the authors initiated the use of Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage. This innovative technique has been used by the authors on 2365 patients over the past 10 years: in 165 patients with traumatic nasal deformity, in 350 patients with postrhinoplasty deformity, and in 1850 patients during primary rhinoplasty. The highlights of the surgical procedure include harvested cartilage (septal, alar, conchal, and sometimes costal) cut in pieces of 0.5 to 1 mm using a no. 11 blade. The fine-textured cartilage mass is then wrapped in one layer of Surgicel and moistened with an antibiotic (rifamycin). The graft is then molded into a cylindrical form and inserted under the dorsal nasal skin. In the lateral wall and tip of the nose, some overcorrection is performed depending on the type of deformity. When the mucosal stitching is complete, this graft can be externally molded, like plasticine, under the dorsal skin. In cases of mild-to-moderate nasal depression, septal and conchal cartilages are used in the same manner to augment the nasal dorsum with consistently effective and durable results. In cases with more severe defects of the nose, costal cartilage is necessary to correct both the length of the nose and the projection of the columella. In patients with recurrent deviation of the nasal bridge, this technique provided a simple solution to the problem. After overexcision of the dorsal part of deviated septal cartilage and insertion of Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage, a straight nose was obtained in all patients with no recurrence (follow-up of 1 to 10 years). The technique also proved to be highly effective in primary rhinoplasties to camouflage bone irregularities after hump removal in patients with thin nasal skin and/or in cases when excessive hump removal was performed. As a complication, in six patients early postoperative swelling was more than usual. In 16 patients, overcorrection was persistent owing to fibrosis, and in 11 patients resorption was excessive beyond the expected amount. A histologic evaluation was possible in 16 patients, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, by removing thin slices of excess cartilage from the dorsum of the nose during touch-up surgery. This graft showed a mosaic-type alignment of graft cartilage with fibrous tissue connection among the fragments. In conclusion, this type of graft is very easy to apply, because a plasticine-like material is obtained that can be molded with the fingers, giving a smooth surface with desirable form and long-lasting results in all cases. The favorable results obtained by this technique have led the authors to use Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage routinely in all types of rhinoplasty.

The use of diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery was recently revived by Erol with the publication of his technique for "Turkish delight" grafts (i.e., diced cartilage grafts wrapped in Surgicel). The present study details the authors' experience with 50 consecutive diced cartilage grafts used in three configurations during a prospective study of 50 primary and secondary aesthetic rhinoplasty procedures performed by the senior author (Daniel). Part I consists of 22 diced cartilage grafts wrapped in Surgicel and placed in the radix (n = 14), radix/upper dorsum (n = 4), and full-length dorsum (n = 4). All grafts were performed adhering meticulously to Erol's technique without modification. This portion of the study was halted abruptly at 4 months because of the unexpected absorption and clinical failure of all diced cartilage grafts wrapped in Surgicel. Subsequently, five patients had revision surgery, and biopsy specimens were taken at the prior grafting site and analyzed histologically. After this clinical failure, part II of the study began, consisting of 20 patients who had diced cartilage grafts wrapped in fascia. The range of applications was comparable: radix (n = 12), radix/dorsum (n = 3), and full-length dorsum (n = 5). Because of our prior practice of overcorrecting by 20 percent with diced cartilage grafts wrapped in Surgicel, we had excessive amounts of material in six of our initial diced cartilage wrapped in fascia radix grafts, but no subsequent grafts. The overcorrections were easily reduced at 6 weeks to 11 months postoperatively using a pituitary rongeur under local anesthesia, and the material was sent for histologic analysis. Minimum 1-year follow-up of all 20 cases has shown maintenance of the grafts without evidence of absorption. Part III of this study comprised eight patients who had diced cartilage grafts without a fascial covering placed throughout the nose, including on the sides of osseocartilaginous rib grafts to the dorsum. At 14 months, there was no evidence that any of these grafts had been absorbed. Histologic analysis of the biopsy specimens from the diced cartilage grafts wrapped in Surgicel showed evidence of fibrosis and lymphocytic infiltrates with small amounts of Surgicel visible on birefringent microscopy. Remnants of cartilage were present but were metabolically inactive on the basis of negative glial fibrillary acidic protein staining. Control specimens of fresh septal cartilage and banked septal cartilage were remarkably similar to each other and demonstrated normal cartilage architecture and cellular activity. The diced cartilage grafts wrapped in fascia showed coalescence of the diced cartilage into a single cartilage mass, with viable cartilage cells and normal metabolic activity on the basis of glial fibrillary acidic protein staining. All of the diced cartilage grafts wrapped in Surgicel absorbed and failed to correct the clinical problem for which they were performed. All of the diced cartilage grafts wrapped in fascia and pure diced cartilage grafts did correct the clinical deformities and appear to have survived completely. The diced cartilage grafts wrapped in fascia placed along the dorsum were distinctly palpable throughout the postoperative period, as was one prior case with a 6-year follow-up. The authors' clinical experience confirms the experimental studies of Yilmaz et al. that question the use of Surgicel for wrapping diced cartilage grafts in clinical rhinoplasty surgery.

Dorsal hump reduction can create both functional and aesthetic problems if performed incorrectly. Component dorsal hump reduction allows a graduated approach to the correction of the nasal dorsum by emphasizing the integrity of the upper lateral cartilages when performing dorsal reduction. Use of this approach can minimize the need for spreader grafts in primary rhinoplasty patients. Possible untoward sequelae of dorsal hump reduction include long-term dorsal irregularities caused by uneven resection or overresection or underresection of the osseocartilaginous hump irregularity; the inverted-V deformity; and excessive narrowing of the midvault. The component dorsal hump reduction technique is a five-step method: (1) separation of the upper lateral cartilages from the septum, (2) incremental reduction of the septum proper, (3) dorsal bony reduction, (4) verification by palpation, and (5) final modifications (spreader grafts, suturing techniques, osteotomies). A graduated approach is described that offers control and precision at each interval. Fundamental to the final outcome is the protection and formation of strong dorsal aesthetic lines that define the appearance of the dorsum on frontal view. Furthermore, preservation of the transverse portions of the upper lateral cartilages is essential to maintain patency of the internal nasal valve, maintain the shape of the dorsal aesthetic lines, and avoid the inverted-V deformity. Finally, if needed, spreader grafts are enormously adaptable and can be customized for any deformity (unilateral or bilateral, visible or invisible) to handle functional or aesthetic problems.