34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 2.2 Impact Factor I 5.8 CiteScore I 0.782 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Long-Term Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppressive Treatment for Young Patients with Lupus Nephritis: A Prospective Study in Daily Clinical Practice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The optimal long-term treatment for lupus nephritis (LN) in pubertal patients remains to be determined. Tacrolimus (Tac) inhibits T cell activation, and is therefore expected to be effective in patients with LN. However, little has been published about the long-term efficacy and safety of Tac-based immunosuppressive treatment of young patients with LN in daily clinical practice. Methods: Nineteen consecutive patients with biopsy-proven LN were recruited for an open-label, prospective, long-term Tac-based treatment regimen. Tac was administered once daily at a dose of 3 mg as induction- or reinduction-maintenance treatment. Four patients (21%) with new-onset LN received mizoribine at a dose of 150 mg once daily in addition to Tac. Treatment outcomes were defined by the European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM) index, urinary protein/creatinine ratio (Up/cr), serum creatinine and serological lupus markers (complement C3, complement hemolytic activity, CH<sub>50</sub>, and anti-dsDNA antibody titer). Data on these parameters were collected prospectively. The median follow-up was 42 months. Results: Baseline characteristics of the patients were as follows: mean age, 18 years; Up/cr, 0.89 ± 1.17; serum C3, 68.1 ± 23.2 mg/dl (normal, 79–152 mg/dl); serum CH<sub>50</sub>, 26.4 ± 10.5 U/ml (normal, 23–46 U/ml); serum anti-dsDNA antibody titer, 69.3 ± 67.5 IU/ml (normal, <12.0 IU/ml); serum creatinine, 0.55 ± 0.18 mg/dl, and ECLAM index, 4.6 ± 1.9. Despite gradually tapering the dose of concomitantly administered prednisolone, a marked improvement compared with baseline values was observed in all outcome measures as early as 3 months after the initiation of treatment, and the favorable changes persisted throughout the treatment period in most of the patients. Sustained improvements in the outcome measures compared with the baseline values were confirmed after a mean of 42 months of treatment: ECLAM index, 1.1 ± 1.1; serum CH<sub>50</sub>, 36.0 ± 12.8 U/ml, anti-dsDNA antibody titer, 22.5 ± 26.5 IU/ml (all p < 0.01); Up/cr ratio, 0.35 ± 0.58, and serum C3 level, 79.7 ± 17.6 mg/dl (both p < 0.05). Serum creatinine level remained within the normal range in all the study participants. Complete response was achieved in 12 patients (63%), and a partial response was achieved in 5 patients (26%). The remaining 2 patients showed no response. No serious adverse effects were observed. Conclusion: The data suggest that long-term, relatively low-dose Tac-based immunosuppressive treatment is beneficial and has low cytotoxicity, and therefore represents an attractive option for the treatment of young patients with LN in daily clinical practice. Further studies involving a larger number of patients are needed to confirm these results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. Hong Kong-Guangzhou Nephrology Study Group.

          The combination of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone is effective for the treatment of severe lupus nephritis but has serious adverse effects. Whether mycophenolate mofetil can be substituted for cyclophosphamide is not known. In 42 patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis we compared the efficacy and side effects of a regimen of prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil given for 12 months with those of a regimen of prednisolone and cyclophosphamide given for 6 months, followed by prednisolone and azathioprine for 6 months. Complete remission was defined as a value for urinary protein excretion that was less than 0.3 g per 24 hours, with normal urinary sediment, a normal serum albumin concentration, and values for serum creatinine and creatinine clearance that were no more than 15 percent above the base-line values. Partial remission was defined as a value for urinary protein excretion that was between 0.3 and 2.9 g per 24 hours, with a serum albumin concentration of at least 30 g per liter. Eighty-one percent of the 21 patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone (group 1) had a complete remission, and 14 percent had a partial remission, as compared with 76 percent and 14 percent, respectively, of the 21 patients treated with cyclophosphamide and prednisolone followed by azathioprine and prednisolone (group 2). The improvements in the degree of proteinuria and the serum albumin and creatinine concentrations were similar in the two groups. One patient in each group discontinued treatment because of side effects. Infections were noted in 19 percent of the patients in group 1 and in 33 percent of those in group 2 (P = 0.29). Other adverse effects occurred only in group 2; they included amenorrhea (in 23 percent of the patients), hair loss (19 percent), leukopenia (10 percent), and death (10 percent). The rates of relapse were 15 percent and 11 percent, respectively. For the treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis, the combination of mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone is as effective as a regimen of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone followed by azathioprine and prednisolone but is less toxic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Successful treatment of class V+IV lupus nephritis with multitarget therapy.

            Treatment of class V+IV lupus nephritis remains unsatisfactory despite the progress made in the treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. In this prospective study, 40 patients with class V+IV lupus nephritis were randomly assigned to induction therapy with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and steroids (multitarget therapy) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY). Patients were treated for 6 mo unless complete remission was not achieved, in which case treatment was extended to 9 mo. An intention-to-treat analysis revealed a higher rate of complete remission with multitarget therapy at both 6 and 9 mo (50 and 65%, respectively) than with IVCY (5 and 15%, respectively). At 6 mo, eight (40%) patients in each group experienced partial remission, and at 9 mo, six (30%) patients receiving multitarget therapy and eight (40%) patients receiving IVCY experienced partial remission. There were no deaths during this study. Most adverse events were less frequent in the multitarget therapy group. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity was not observed, but three patients developed new-onset hypertension with multitarget therapy. In conclusion, multitarget therapy is superior to IVCY for inducing complete remission of class V+IV lupus nephritis and is well tolerated.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Short-term outcomes of induction therapy with tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide for active lupus nephritis: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.

              Intravenous cyclophosphamide with prednisone is an effective treatment for lupus nephritis, but with significant toxicities. We compared the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus intravenous cyclophosphamide as induction therapy. Multicenter noninferiority randomized controlled trial. 81 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis from 9 nephrology centers in China from 2006-2008. Prednisone and either tacrolimus (n = 42) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (n = 39) for 6 months. Tacrolimus was started at 0.05 mg/kg/d and titrated to achieve a trough blood concentration of 5-10 ng/mL. Intravenous cyclophosphamide was initiated at 750 mg/m² of body surface area, then adjusted to 500-1,000 mg/m² every 4 weeks for a total of 6 pulse treatments. The primary outcome was complete remission (proteinuria with protein excretion <0.3 g/24 h, serum albumin ≥3.5 g/dL, normal urinary sediment, and normal or stable serum creatinine level) at 6 months. Response (complete or partial remission), clinical parameters, and adverse effects were secondary end points. After the 6-month induction therapy, the tacrolimus group achieved higher cumulative probabilities of complete remission and response (52.4% vs 38.5% and 90.5% vs 82.1%, respectively) than the intravenous cyclophosphamide group, but differences were not statistically significant (log-rank test, P = 0.2 and P = 0.7, respectively). Proteinuria [corrected] was significantly decreased in tacrolimus- versus intravenous cyclophosphamide-treated patients after the first month of treatment, even with adjustment for baseline proteinuria (protein excretion, 1.76 vs 2.40 g/d; P = 0.02 for the log-transformed analysis). [corrected] After treatment, serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rates were not significantly different between treatment groups. Adverse effects, such as leukopenia and gastrointestinal symptoms, were less frequent in the tacrolimus group. Nonblinded, small sample size, and short duration of follow-up. In conjunction with prednisone, induction therapy with tacrolimus is at least as efficacious as intravenous cyclophosphamide and prednisone in producing complete remission of lupus nephritis and has a more favorable safety profile. Copyright © 2011 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NEC
                Nephron Clin Pract
                10.1159/issn.1660-2110
                Nephron Clinical Practice
                S. Karger AG
                1660-2110
                2012
                February 2013
                16 January 2013
                : 121
                : 3-4
                : c165-c173
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of Pediatrics, Hirosaki University Hospital, and bDepartment of School Health Science, Faculty of Education, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, and cDepartment of Pediatrics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
                Author notes
                *Hiroshi Tanaka, MD, PhD, Department of School Health Science, Faculty of Education, Hirosaki University, 1 Bunkyo-cho, Hirosaki 036-8560 (Japan), E-Mail hirotana@cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp
                Article
                346149 Nephron Clin Pract 2012;121:c165–c173
                10.1159/000346149
                23327881
                ff8584b3-82a0-4dc0-971c-49e1e8f7483f
                © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 24 August 2012
                : 28 November 2012
                Page count
                Tables: 4, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Lupus nephritis,Pediatric-onset cases,Tacrolimus,Systemic lupus erythematosus,Long-term immunosuppressive treatment,Mizoribine

                Comments

                Comment on this article