41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A daily temperature rhythm in the human brain predicts survival after brain injury

      research-article
      , , , , , , The CENTER-TBI High Resolution ICU (HR ICU) Sub-Study Participants and Investigators, , ,
      Brain
      Oxford University Press
      brain temperature, brain thermometry, daily, brain injury, mortality

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Patients undergo interventions to achieve a ‘normal’ brain temperature; a parameter that remains undefined for humans. The profound sensitivity of neuronal function to temperature implies the brain should be isothermal, but observations from patients and non-human primates suggest significant spatiotemporal variation. We aimed to determine the clinical relevance of brain temperature in patients by establishing how much it varies in healthy adults.

          We retrospectively screened data for all patients recruited to the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) High Resolution Intensive Care Unit Sub-Study. Only patients with direct brain temperature measurements and without targeted temperature management were included. To interpret patient analyses, we prospectively recruited 40 healthy adults (20 males, 20 females, 20–40 years) for brain thermometry using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Participants were scanned in the morning, afternoon, and late evening of a single day.

          In patients ( n = 114), brain temperature ranged from 32.6 to 42.3°C and mean brain temperature (38.5 ± 0.8°C) exceeded body temperature (37.5 ± 0.5°C, P < 0.0001). Of 100 patients eligible for brain temperature rhythm analysis, 25 displayed a daily rhythm, and the brain temperature range decreased in older patients ( P = 0.018). In healthy participants, brain temperature ranged from 36.1 to 40.9°C; mean brain temperature (38.5 ± 0.4°C) exceeded oral temperature (36.0 ± 0.5°C) and was 0.36°C higher in luteal females relative to follicular females and males ( P = 0.0006 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Temperature increased with age, most notably in deep brain regions (0.6°C over 20 years, P = 0.0002), and varied spatially by 2.41 ± 0.46°C with highest temperatures in the thalamus. Brain temperature varied by time of day, especially in deep regions (0.86°C, P = 0.0001), and was lowest at night. From the healthy data we built HEATWAVE—a 4D map of human brain temperature. Testing the clinical relevance of HEATWAVE in patients, we found that lack of a daily brain temperature rhythm increased the odds of death in intensive care 21-fold ( P = 0.016), whilst absolute temperature maxima or minima did not predict outcome. A warmer mean brain temperature was associated with survival ( P = 0.035), however, and ageing by 10 years increased the odds of death 11-fold ( P = 0.0002).

          Human brain temperature is higher and varies more than previously assumed—by age, sex, menstrual cycle, brain region, and time of day. This has major implications for temperature monitoring and management, with daily brain temperature rhythmicity emerging as one of the strongest single predictors of survival after brain injury. We conclude that daily rhythmic brain temperature variation—not absolute brain temperature—is one way in which human brain physiology may be distinguished from pathophysiology.

          Abstract

          Temperature-based treatment after brain injury is controversial because ‘normal’ human brain temperature ( T Br) remains undefined. Building a 4D human T Br map, Rzechorzek et al. show that T Br exceeds body temperature by 2–3°C, and varies by age, sex, brain region and time. Loss of a daily T Br rhythm reliably predicts death after TBI.

          Related collections

          Most cited references109

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration

            Summary Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) is a common accompaniment of ageing. Features seen on neuroimaging include recent small subcortical infarcts, lacunes, white matter hyperintensities, perivascular spaces, microbleeds, and brain atrophy. SVD can present as a stroke or cognitive decline, or can have few or no symptoms. SVD frequently coexists with neurodegenerative disease, and can exacerbate cognitive deficits, physical disabilities, and other symptoms of neurodegeneration. Terminology and definitions for imaging the features of SVD vary widely, which is also true for protocols for image acquisition and image analysis. This lack of consistency hampers progress in identifying the contribution of SVD to the pathophysiology and clinical features of common neurodegenerative diseases. We are an international working group from the Centres of Excellence in Neurodegeneration. We completed a structured process to develop definitions and imaging standards for markers and consequences of SVD. We aimed to achieve the following: first, to provide a common advisory about terms and definitions for features visible on MRI; second, to suggest minimum standards for image acquisition and analysis; third, to agree on standards for scientific reporting of changes related to SVD on neuroimaging; and fourth, to review emerging imaging methods for detection and quantification of preclinical manifestations of SVD. Our findings and recommendations apply to research studies, and can be used in the clinical setting to standardise image interpretation, acquisition, and reporting. This Position Paper summarises the main outcomes of this international effort to provide the STandards for ReportIng Vascular changes on nEuroimaging (STRIVE).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition.

              The scope and purpose of this work is 2-fold: to synthesize the available evidence and to translate it into recommendations. This document provides recommendations only when there is evidence to support them. As such, they do not constitute a complete protocol for clinical use. Our intention is that these recommendations be used by others to develop treatment protocols, which necessarily need to incorporate consensus and clinical judgment in areas where current evidence is lacking or insufficient. We think it is important to have evidence-based recommendations to clarify what aspects of practice currently can and cannot be supported by evidence, to encourage use of evidence-based treatments that exist, and to encourage creativity in treatment and research in areas where evidence does not exist. The communities of neurosurgery and neuro-intensive care have been early pioneers and supporters of evidence-based medicine and plan to continue in this endeavor. The complete guideline document, which summarizes and evaluates the literature for each topic, and supplemental appendices (A-I) are available online at https://www.braintrauma.org/coma/guidelines.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Brain
                Brain
                brainj
                Brain
                Oxford University Press
                0006-8950
                1460-2156
                June 2022
                13 June 2022
                13 June 2022
                : 145
                : 6
                : 2031-2048
                Affiliations
                MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology , Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
                Edinburgh Imaging (Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh) Facility , Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
                Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK
                Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK
                Edinburgh Imaging (Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh) Facility , Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
                Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK
                Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Box 93 Addenbrooke’s Hospital , Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
                Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Box 167, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke’s Hospital , Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
                Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, NHS Lothian , Room No. S8208 (2nd Floor), Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
                Edinburgh Imaging (Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh) Facility , Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
                Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK
                MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology , Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Nina Rzechorzek MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK E-mail: ninar@ 123456mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
                Correspondence may also be addressed to: John O’Neill E-mail: oneillj@ 123456mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk

                Jonathan Rhodes, Ian Marshall and John S O’Neill contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3209-5019
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7858-9917
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7742-1757
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2189-443X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8350-8093
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1710-6544
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2015-4579
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-1551
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2204-6096
                Article
                awab466
                10.1093/brain/awab466
                9336587
                35691613
                ff23d46d-bf30-4cb8-81ff-50901b913f6c
                © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 03 May 2021
                : 03 November 2021
                : 20 November 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Council, doi 10.13039/501100000265;
                Funded by: Medical Research Council, doi 10.13039/501100000265;
                Award ID: MC_UP_1201/4
                Award ID: 602150
                Funded by: European Union’s 7th Framework, doi 10.13039/100011102;
                Award ID: FP7/2007-2013
                Funded by: Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, doi 10.13039/501100007731;
                Funded by: One Mind, doi 10.13039/100018727;
                Funded by: Integra LifeSciences Corporation, doi 10.13039/100009006;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Editor's Choice
                AcademicSubjects/MED00310
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01870

                Neurosciences
                brain temperature,brain thermometry,daily,brain injury,mortality
                Neurosciences
                brain temperature, brain thermometry, daily, brain injury, mortality

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                78
                2
                74
                0
                Smart Citations
                78
                2
                74
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content130

                Cited by31

                Most referenced authors1,335