37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of an intervention for perinatal anxiety on breastfeeding: findings from the Happy Mother—Healthy Baby randomized controlled trial in Pakistan

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The study examined the effects of Happy Mother—Healthy Baby (HMHB), a cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention on breastfeeding outcomes for Pakistani women with prenatal anxiety.

          Methods

          Breastfeeding practices were evaluated in a randomized controlled trial between 2019 and 2022 in a public hospital in Pakistan. The intervention group was randomized to receive six HMHB sessions targeted towards prenatal anxiety (with breastfeeding discussed in the final session), while both groups also received enhanced usual care. Breastfeeding was defined in four categories: early breastfeeding, exclusive early breastfeeding, recent breastfeeding, and exclusive recent breastfeeding. Early breastfeeding referred to the first 24 h after birth and recent breastfeeding referred to the last 24 h before an assessment at six-weeks postpartum. Potential confounders included were mother’s age, baseline depression and anxiety levels, stress, social support, if the first pregnancy (or not) and history of stillbirth or miscarriage as well as child’s gestational age, gender. Both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were examined. Stratified analyses were also used to compare intervention efficacy for those with mild vs severe anxiety.

          Results

          Out of the 1307 eligible women invited to participate, 107 declined to participate and 480 were lost to follow-up, resulting in 720 women who completed the postpartum assessment. Both intervention and control arms were similar on demographic characteristics (e.g. sex, age, income, family structure). In the primary intent-to-treat analysis, there was a marginal impact of the intervention on early breastfeeding (OR 1.38, 95% CI: 0.99–1.92; 75.4% ( N = 273) vs. 69.0% ( N = 247)) and a non-significant association with other breastfeeding outcomes (OR1.42, 95% CI: 0.89–2.27; (47) 12.9% vs. (34) 9.5%, exclusive early breastfeeding; OR 1.48, 95% CI: 0.94–2.35; 90% ( N = 327) vs. 86% ( N = 309), recent breastfeeding; OR1.01, 95% CI: 0.76–1.35; 49% ( N = 178) vs 49% ( N = 175) exclusive recent breastfeeding). Among those who completed the intervention’s six core sessions, the intervention increased the odds of early breastfeeding (OR1.69, 95% CI:1.12–2.54; 79% ( N = 154) vs. 69% ( N = 247)) and recent breastfeeding (OR 2.05, 95% CI:1.10–3.81; 93% ( N = 181) vs. 86% ( N = 309)). For women with mild anxiety at enrolment, the intervention increased the odds of recent breastfeeding (OR 2.41, 95% CI:1.17–5.00; 92% ( N = 137) vs. 83% ( N = 123).

          Conclusions

          The study highlights the potential of CBT-based interventions like HMHB to enhance breastfeeding among women with mild perinatal anxiety, contingent upon full participation in the intervention.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03880032.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13006-024-00655-8.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Global Measure of Perceived Stress

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review.

            To review the literature of the validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A review of the 747 identified papers that used HADS was performed to address the following questions: (I) How are the factor structure, discriminant validity and the internal consistency of HADS? (II) How does HADS perform as a case finder for anxiety disorders and depression? (III) How does HADS agree with other self-rating instruments used to rate anxiety and depression? Most factor analyses demonstrated a two-factor solution in good accordance with the HADS subscales for Anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS-D), respectively. The correlations between the two subscales varied from.40 to.74 (mean.56). Cronbach's alpha for HADS-A varied from.68 to.93 (mean.83) and for HADS-D from.67 to.90 (mean.82). In most studies an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity was achieved when caseness was defined by a score of 8 or above on both HADS-A and HADS-D. The sensitivity and specificity for both HADS-A and HADS-D of approximately 0.80 were very similar to the sensitivity and specificity achieved by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Correlations between HADS and other commonly used questionnaires were in the range.49 to.83. HADS was found to perform well in assessing the symptom severity and caseness of anxiety disorders and depression in both somatic, psychiatric and primary care patients and in the general population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                psurkan@jhu.edu
                Journal
                Int Breastfeed J
                Int Breastfeed J
                International Breastfeeding Journal
                BioMed Central (London )
                1746-4358
                2 August 2024
                2 August 2024
                2024
                : 19
                : 53
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, ( https://ror.org/04xs57h96) Liverpool, UK
                [2 ]Human Development Research Foundation, ( https://ror.org/055g9vf08) Rawalpindi, Pakistan
                [3 ]Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, ( https://ror.org/00za53h95) Baltimore, Maryland USA
                [4 ]Health Services Academy, ( https://ror.org/02a37xs76) Islamabad, Pakistan
                Article
                655
                10.1186/s13006-024-00655-8
                11295719
                39095863
                fefc2fd6-8e33-4167-9161-53d5e7542a5c
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 14 December 2023
                : 29 June 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025, National Institute of Mental Health;
                Award ID: RO1 MH111859
                Award ID: RO1 MH111859
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                breastfeeding,prenatal anxiety,cognitive-behavioural therapy,intervention,pakistan

                Comments

                Comment on this article