22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Foraging response and acclimation of ambush feeding and feeding-current feeding copepods to toxic dinoflagellates : Feeding behavior and toxin acclimation

      1 , 2 , 1 , 1
      Limnology and Oceanography
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sodium channel mutation leading to saxitoxin resistance in clams increases risk of PSP.

          Bivalve molluscs, the primary vectors of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) in humans, show marked inter-species variation in their capacity to accumulate PSP toxins (PSTs) which has a neural basis. PSTs cause human fatalities by blocking sodium conductance in nerve fibres. Here we identify a molecular basis for inter-population variation in PSP resistance within a species, consistent with genetic adaptation to PSTs. Softshell clams (Mya arenaria) from areas exposed to 'red tides' are more resistant to PSTs, as demonstrated by whole-nerve assays, and accumulate toxins at greater rates than sensitive clams from unexposed areas. PSTs lead to selective mortality of sensitive clams. Resistance is caused by natural mutation of a single amino acid residue, which causes a 1,000-fold decrease in affinity at the saxitoxin-binding site in the sodium channel pore of resistant, but not sensitive, clams. Thus PSTs might act as potent natural selection agents, leading to greater toxin resistance in clam populations and increased risk of PSP in humans. Furthermore, global expansion of PSP to previously unaffected coastal areas might result in long-term changes to communities and ecosystems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Toxic marine phytoplankton, zooplankton grazers, and pelagic food webs

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Copepods induce paralytic shellfish toxin production in marine dinoflagellates.

              Among the thousands of unicellular phytoplankton species described in the sea, some frequently occurring and bloom-forming marine dinoflagellates are known to produce the potent neurotoxins causing paralytic shellfish poisoning. The natural function of these toxins is not clear, although they have been hypothesized to act as a chemical defence towards grazers. Here, we show that waterborne cues from the copepod Acartia tonsa induce paralytic shellfish toxin (PST) production in the harmful algal bloom-forming dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum. Induced A. minutum contained up to 2.5 times more toxins than controls and was more resistant to further copepod grazing. Ingestion of non-toxic alternative prey was not affected by the presence of induced A. minutum. The ability of A. minutum to sense and respond to the presence of grazers by increased PST production and increased resistance to grazing may facilitate the formation of harmful algal blooms in the sea.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Limnology and Oceanography
                Limnol. Oceanogr.
                Wiley
                00243590
                January 10 2018
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Ocean Life, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark; Kgs. Lyngby Denmark
                [2 ]Key and Open Laboratory of Marine and Estuary Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture of China; East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fisheries Sciences; Shanghai China
                Article
                10.1002/lno.10782
                fe7a8a9c-d7de-4573-8510-bbf3f2ad2f71
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article