144
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness of 2-Dose BNT162b2 (Pfizer BioNTech) mRNA Vaccine in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children Aged 5–11 Years and Adolescents Aged 12–15 Years — PROTECT Cohort, July 2021–February 2022

      research-article
      , ScD 1 , , , DO 2 , , PhD 3 , , DO 4 , , PhD 5 , , MS 1 , , MD 2 , , PhD 6 , , MEd, MSPM 4 , , MS, MPH 5 , 7 , , MSPH 1 , , PhD 2 , , PhD 6 , , PhD 4 , , MPH 5 , , MPH 7 , , MPH 1 , , MD 2 , , MD 6 , 4 , , PhD 5 , 7 , , MSPH 1 , , MBBS 6 , , DO 4 , , MPH 5 , , MPH 7 , , MSPH 1 , , PhD 6 , , MPH 5 , , PhD 6 , , MSPA 5 , , PhD 6 , , MPH 5 , , MA 6 , , MSc 5 , , MPH 6 , , MPA 5 , 6 , , MSPH 5 , , MPP 3 , , MSc 6 , , MD 8 , , PhD 9 , , PhD 5 , , DO, PhD 4 , , MD 6 , , PhD 1 , , MBBS 7 , 10
      Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
      Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was recommended by CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for persons aged 12–15 years (referred to as adolescents in this report) on May 12, 2021, and for children aged 5–11 years on November 2, 2021 ( 1 – 4 ). Real-world data on vaccine effectiveness (VE) in these age groups are needed, especially because when the B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant became predominant in the United States in December 2021, early investigations of VE demonstrated a decline in protection against symptomatic infection for adolescents aged 12–15 years and adults* ( 5 ). The PROTECT † prospective cohort of 1,364 children and adolescents aged 5–15 years was tested weekly for SARS-CoV-2, irrespective of symptoms, and upon COVID-19–associated illness during July 25, 2021–February 12, 2022. Among unvaccinated participants (i.e., those who had received no COVID-19 vaccine doses) with any laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, those with B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant infections were more likely to report COVID-19 symptoms (66%) than were those with Omicron infections (49%). Among fully vaccinated children aged 5–11 years, VE against any symptomatic and asymptomatic Omicron infection 14–82 days (the longest interval after dose 2 in this age group) after receipt of dose 2 of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 31% (95% CI = 9%–48%), adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, health information, frequency of social contact, mask use, location, and local virus circulation. Among adolescents aged 12–15 years, adjusted VE 14–149 days after dose 2 was 87% (95% CI = 49%–97%) against symptomatic and asymptomatic Delta infection and 59% (95% CI = 22%–79%) against Omicron infection. Fully vaccinated participants with Omicron infection spent an average of one half day less sick in bed than did unvaccinated participants with Omicron infection. All eligible children and adolescents should remain up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccinations. PROTECT is a prospective cohort study monitoring SARS-CoV-2 infections among participants aged 6 months–17 years in jurisdictions in four states (Arizona, Florida, Texas, and Utah), initiated in July 2021 ( 6 ). Upon enrollment, parents or legal guardians provided the participants’ demographic, health, vaccination history, and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection information; the number of hours and percentage of time participants wore masks in school and in the community were reported monthly. § Vaccination was verified by vaccine cards, electronic medical records, and state immunization registries. Active surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 infection and any COVID-19–associated symptoms ¶ within the preceding 7 days occurred through weekly submission of a survey and nasal swab for reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction testing and viral whole genome sequencing.** Specific symptoms and duration, hours of school missed because of illness, and receipt of medical care were documented through the electronic surveys. For the calculation of VE, person-time for adolescents aged 12–15 years began at the start of active surveillance on July 25, 2021, and ended February 12, 2022, or, for adolescents eligible for a third (booster) dose (≥5 months after second mRNA vaccine dose receipt), person-time ended when a booster dose was authorized on January 3, 2022. †† For children aged 5–11 years, person-time for Omicron models began 6 weeks after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was recommended on November 2, 2021, and ended February 12, 2022. COVID-19 characteristics and comparisons between Delta and Omicron infections were assessed. Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying vaccination status were used to calculate hazard ratios of unvaccinated to vaccinated participants with no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (≥14 days after receipt of a second Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine dose), weighted for inverse probability of vaccination using sociodemographic characteristics, health information, frequency of social contact, mask use, location, and local virus circulation. Characteristics of Omicron infections among vaccinated and unvaccinated participants were also compared. §§ All analyses were conducted using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute) or R software (version 4.1.2; R Foundation). This study was reviewed by CDC and approved by the institutional review boards at participating sites or under a reliance agreement with Abt Associates institutional review board and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy. ¶¶ The study sample comprised 1,364 participants, including 1,052 (77%) children aged 5–11 years and 312 (23%) adolescents aged 12–15 years (Table 1).*** Overall, 76% of participants lived in Arizona, 52% were female, 76% were White, 34% were Hispanic, and 10% had at least one chronic medical condition. Of 381 SARS-CoV-2 infections among children aged 5–11 years, and 127 infections among adolescents aged 12–15 years, 352 (93%) and 97 (76%), respectively, were Omicron infections. TABLE 1 Characteristics of children and adolescents aged 5–15 years in the PROTECT* Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness cohort — four states, July 2021–February 2022 Characteristic All participants, no. (column %) COVID-19 vaccination status, no. (row %) P-value§ All SARS-CoV-2 infections, no. (row %) P-value§ Unvaccinated ≥1 dose† Yes¶ No All participants 1,364 386 (28.3) 978 (71.7) — 508 (37.2) 856 (62.8) — Geographic location Phoenix, Arizona 232 (17.0) 53 (22.8) 179 (77.2) <0.001 87 (37.5) 145 (62.5) <0.001 Tucson, Arizona 682 (50.0) 127 (18.6) 555 (81.4) 214 (31.4) 468 (68.6) Other areas in Arizona 121 (8.9) 50 (41.3) 71 (58.7) 55 (45.5) 66 (54.5) Miami, Florida 114 (8.4) 59 (51.8) 55 (48.2) 50 (43.9) 64 (56.1) Temple, Texas 84 (6.2) 41 (48.8) 43 (51.2) 47 (56.0) 37 (44.0) Salt Lake City, Utah 131 (9.6) 56 (42.7) 75 (57.3) 55 (42.0) 76 (58.0) Age group, yrs 5–11 1,052 (77.1) 301 (28.6) 751 (71.4) 0.637 381 (36.2) 671 (63.8) 0.150 12–15 312 (22.9) 85 (27.2) 227 (72.8) 127 (40.7) 185 (59.3) Sex Female 713 (52.3) 203 (28.5) 510 (71.5) 0.883 254 (35.6) 459 (64.4) 0.196 Male 651 (47.7) 183 (28.1) 468 (71.9) 254 (39.0) 397 (61.0) Ethnicity (all races) Hispanic 469 (34.4) 158 (33.7) 311 (66.3) 0.264 163 (34.8) 306 (65.2) 0.312 Non-Hispanic 895 (65.6) 228 (25.5) 667 (74.5) 345 (38.5) 550 (61.5) Race (all ethnicities)** White 1,032 (75.7) 284 (27.5) 748 (72.5) 0.260 392 (38.0) 640 (62.0) 0.318 Other races 332 (24.3) 102 (30.7) 230 (69.3) 116 (34.9) 216 (65.1) No. of children in household 1 204 (15.0) 52 (25.5) 152 (74.5) 0.334 66 (32.4) 138 (67.6) 0.117 ≥2 1160 (85.0) 334 (28.8) 826 (71.2) 442 (38.1) 718 (61.9) Chronic condition†† One or more 139 (10.2) 39 (28.1) 100 (71.9) 0.835 57 (41.0) 82 (59.0) 0.718 None 1,225 (89.8) 347 (28.3) 878 (71.7) 451 (36.8) 774 (63.2) Daily medication§§ None 823 (60.3) 194 (50.3) 629 (64.3) 0.121 287 (56.5) 536 (62.6) 0.626 1 116 (8.5) 21 (5.4) 95 (9.7) 40 (7.9) 76 (8.9) 2 52 (3.8) 5 (1.3) 47 (4.8) 21 (4.1) 31 (3.6) 3 24 (1.8) 4 (1.0) 20 (2.0) 9 (1.8) 15 (1.8) ≥4 16 (1.2) 4 (1.0) 12 (1.2) 3 (0.6) 13 (1.5 Insurance Private 1,052 (77.1) 247 (23.5) 805 (76.5) <0.001 385 (36.6) 667 (63.4) 0.203 Public 197 (14.4) 78 (39.6) 119 (60.4) 84 (42.6) 113 (57.4) None or did not respond 115 (8.4) 61 (53.0) 54 (47.0) 39 (33.9) 76 (66.1) Average weekly social contact and mask use¶¶ Hours attending school, mean (SE) 37.9 (0.2) 36.1 (0.4) 38.5 (0.2) <0.001 36.8 (0.3) 38.6 (0.2) 0.230 Percentage of school time masked, mean (SE) 78.0 (0.2) 59.9 (0.5) 83.8 (0.2) <0.001 71.3 (0.4) 81.8 (0.2) <0.001 Hours in community, mean (SE) 10.7 (0.1) 11.6 (0.2) 10.4 (0.1) 0.157 11.6 (0.1) 10.1 (0.1) 0.041 Percentage of community time masked, mean (SE) 64.3 (0.2) 47.6 (0.5) 69.6 (0.2) <0.001 57.5 (0.4) 68.1 (0.3) <0.001 Hours of COVID-19 exposure, mean (SE) 2.1 (0.1) 2.8 (0.2) 1.8 (0.1) 0.389 2.7 (0.1) 1.7 (0.1) <0.001 * PROTECT (Pediatric Research Observing Trends and Exposures in COVID-19 Timelines) is conducted in Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona; Miami, Florida; Temple, Texas; and Salt Lake City, Utah. † COVID-19 vaccination status excludes participants with reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction–confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first 13 days after receiving their first vaccine dose (n = 36). § P-values comparing the percentage of persons vaccinated with those not vaccinated and those with SARS-CoV-2 infections with those not infected by sociodemographic and health categories were calculated using Pearson’s chi-square test. P-values for continuous variables were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. ¶ SARS-CoV-2 infections were detected by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction testing. ** Among 332 children of other races, 111 (33.4%) identified as multiracial, 43 (13.0%) as Asian, 28 (8%) as Black or African American, eight (2%) as American Indian or Alaskan Native, three (1%) as Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and 14 (4%) as other; race was missing, or respondent declined to answer for 125 (38%). †† Chronic conditions included asthma or chronic lung disease, cancer, diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, immunosuppression or autoimmune disorder, kidney disease, liver disease, neurologic or neuromuscular disorder, or other chronic conditions. §§ Number of daily medications prescribed by a physician were reported by participant parent or legal guardian at study enrollment. ¶¶ Participants were asked to respond to monthly survey questions about COVID-19 exposure, social contact, and mask use during the previous 7 days. The average of monthly responses is calculated for each person. Average values across persons were compared according to their vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection status at the time of this analysis. School hours represent in-person school, child care, or before- or after-school care attendance. Participants who received ≥1 doses of vaccine were reported to have worn a mask during 84% of school hours and 70% of hours in the community, whereas unvaccinated children were masked during 60% of school hours and 48% of hours in the community (p <0.001 for both). Lower percentages of masked time in school (71%) and in the community (58%) were reported for participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared with those of participants who had no infection (82% and 68%, respectively) (p <0.001). Among 252 unvaccinated participants with SARS-CoV-2 infections throughout the study period, 112 (44%) were asymptomatic; unvaccinated participants with Omicron infections were less likely to report COVID-19 symptoms (49%) than were those with Delta infections (66%) (crude odds ratio = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.3–0.8) (Table 2). Overall, unvaccinated participants with COVID-19 symptoms experienced an average of 6.9 days with illness symptoms, spent an average of 1.9 days sick in bed, and missed an average of 24.0 hours of school because of illness. Omicron-associated COVID-19 symptoms lasted an average of 5.3 days and resulted in an average of 18.8 hours of missed school, which was 3.4 fewer days of symptoms (95% CI = –5.7 to –1.0) and 10.6 fewer hours of school missed (95% CI = –18.6 to –2.7) than Delta-associated COVID-19. TABLE 2 Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variant infection characteristics among unvaccinated children and adolescents aged 5–15 years and by Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination status among Omicron infections — PROTECT* cohort study, four states, July 2021–February 2022 Characteristic Participant vaccination status at time of infection Unvaccinated 2 COVID-19 vaccine doses received 14–149 days before infection Infections, no. (%) OR or mean difference, Omicron versus Delta (95% CI)§ P-value§ Omicron No. (%)¶ Adjusted OR or mean difference, vaccinated versus unvaccinated (95% CI)** P-value** Total† Delta Omicron Total participants, no. (%) 252 (100) 102 (100) 150 (100.0) — — 186 (100.0) — — COVID-19–associated symptoms, no. (%)†† 140 (55.6) 67 (65.7) 73 (48.7) 2.0 (1.20 to 3.45) 0.008 116 (62.4) 0.91 (0.48 to 1.59) 0.669 Febrile symptoms, no. (%) §§ 88 (62.9) 38 (56.7) 50 (68.5) 1.7 (0.83 to 3.31) 0.151 66 (56.9) 0.48 (0.23 to 1.03) 0.062 Received medical care, no. (%) 23 (16.4) 11 (16.4) 12 (16.4) 1.0 (0.41 to 2.45) 0.997 18 (15.5) 1.0 (0.43 to 2.48) 0.949 Total days of symptoms, mean (SE) 6.9 (6.7) 8.6 (8.0) 5.3 (5.4) –3.4 (–5.7 to –1.0) 0.006 6.3 (3.9) 0.8 (–1.8 to 2.7) 0.426 Days spent sick in bed, mean (SE) 1.9 (2.4) 1.7 (2.7) 2.1 (2.1) 0.4 (–0.4 to 1.2) 0.322 1.4 (1.6) –0.6 (–1.1 to –0.1) 0.016 Hours of missed school, mean (SE) 24.0 (23.5) 29.5 (24.1) 18.8 (21.8) –10.6 (–18.6 to –2.7) 0.010 26.2 (17.5) 11.1 (4.6 to 17.6) 0.010 Abbreviation: OR = odds ratio. * PROTECT (Pediatric Research Observing Trends and Exposures in COVID-19 Timelines) is conducted in Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona; Miami, Florida; Temple, Texas; and Salt Lake City, Utah. † Includes all participants aged 5–15 years, and infections that occurred at any time during the cohort study (July 25, 2021–February 12, 2022). However, of 275 total infections among unvaccinated participants, only 252 completed a post-illness survey capturing symptoms. § Severity of infection, comparing Delta infections as the referent group with Omicron infections, was assessed by variant type among unvaccinated children and adolescents. Logistic and linear regression models were used for dichotomous and continuous outcome measures, respectively. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. ¶ Of 198 total infections in persons that occurred 14–149 days after dose 2 receipt, 186 completed a post-illness survey to report symptoms. This excludes four Omicron infections in persons aged 12–15 years with infection ≥150 days after receipt of dose 2. ** Severity of infection was assessed by vaccination status, comparing unvaccinated children as the referent group with children vaccinated 14–149 days earlier, among Omicron infections. Comparison of vaccinated and unvaccinated participants with Delta infections was not included because of the limited number of vaccinated children with Delta infections. Logistic and linear regression models were used for dichotomous and continuous outcome measures, respectively, weighted for inverse probability of vaccination by site, sociodemographic characteristics, health information, and knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine. †† COVID-19–associated illness signs and symptoms included fever >100°F (37.8°C), chills, cough, shortness of breath, sore throat, diarrhea, muscle or body aches, change in smell or taste; runny nose, fatigue or being run-down, decreased activity, and irritability or crankiness were also included for nonverbal children. §§ Febrile symptoms were defined as symptoms of feverishness or chills, or a measured temperature >100.4°F (38°C). Among the 1,052 participants aged 5–11 years, 682 (65%) received 2 vaccine doses, 69 (7%) received 1 dose, and 301 (29%) were unvaccinated. Adjusted VE against symptomatic and asymptomatic Omicron infection 14–82 days after receipt of dose 2 (the longest interval after dose 2 in this age group) was 31% (95% CI = 9%–48%) (Table 3). TABLE 3 COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine effectiveness against asymptomatic or symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection among children and adolescents aged 5–15 years, by time since receipt of second vaccine dose and variant — PROTECT* cohort study, four states, July 2021–February 2022 Age group and COVID-19 vaccination status (no. of days since receipt of most recent dose) No. of contributing participants† Total person-days Median no. of days (IQR) No. of SARS-CoV-2 infections§ VE, % (95% CI) Unadjusted Adjusted¶ Children aged 5–11 yrs Omicron variant infections Unvaccinated (referent) 336 13,801 41 (28 to 62) 137 — — 2 doses (14–82 days) 640 29,996 53 (34 to 61) 184 47 (32 to 59) 31 (9 to 48) Adolescents aged 12–15 yrs Delta variant infections Unvaccinated (referent) 139 9,786 65 (25 to 107) 23 — — 2 doses (≥14 days) 193 23,575 142 (91 to 156) 7 87 (70 to 95) 81 (51 to 93) 2 doses (14–149 days) 188 16,517 97 (75 to 105) 3 93 (76 to 98) 87 (49 to 97) 2 doses (≥150 days) 138 7,058 57 (49 to 63) 4 67 (0 to 89) 60 (−35 to 88) Omicron variant infections Unvaccinated (referent) 76 3,001 37 (24 to 62) 38 — — 2 doses (≥14 days) 192 5,432 22 (22 to 31) 18 64 (37 to 80) 59 (24 to 78) 2 doses (14–149 days) 65 2,623 42 (28 to 56) 14 62 (30 to 79) 59 (22 to 79) 2 doses (≥150 days) 134 2,809 22 (22 to 22) 4 74 (16 to 92) 62 (−28 to 89) Abbreviations: SMD = standard mean difference; VE = vaccine effectiveness. * PROTECT (Pediatric Research Observing Trends and Exposures in COVID-19 Timelines) is conducted in Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona; Miami, Florida; Temple, Texas; and Salt Lake City, Utah. † Vaccination status varied with time, therefore, contributing participants in vaccination categories do not equal the number of participants in the study because participants could contribute to more than one vaccination category. § Of 275 SARS-CoV-2 infections among unvaccinated participants, 98 occurred among children aged 5–11 years either before vaccine availability (n = 60) or were Delta infections (n = 17) for whom VE was not calculated. Among vaccinated participants, 61 occurred after receipt of dose 1 and <14 days after dose 2; two children aged 5–11 years were vaccinated before authorization, and two had Delta infections among children aged 5–11 years for whom VE was not calculated. ¶ Adjusted VE is inversely weighted for propensity to be vaccinated. Among children aged 5–11 years, all covariates met balance criteria of SMD <0.2 after weighting for the Delta variant model. For the Omicron variant model, all covariates met balance criteria of SMD <0.2 after weighting, except local virus circulation and social (school or community) mask use, which both changed the VE estimate by ≥5% when added to the model, and thus remained in the final model as covariates. Among adolescents aged 12–15 years, all covariates met balance criteria of SMD <0.2 after weighting except social mask use, which also changed the VE estimate by ≥5% when added to the Delta variant model, and thus remained in the final model as a covariate. For the Omicron variant model, all covariates met balance criteria of SMD <0.2 after weighting, except local virus circulation, social (school or community) mask use, and number of medications. Only local virus circulation changed the VE estimate by ≥5% when added to the model, and thus remained in the final model as a covariate. Among 312 adolescents aged 12–15 years, 212 (68%) received 2 vaccine doses, 15 (5%) received 1 dose, and 85 (27%) were unvaccinated. The adjusted VE at 14–149 days after receipt of dose 2 was 87% (95% CI = 49%–97%) against Delta infection and 59% (95% CI = 22%–79%) against Omicron infection. Adjusted VE ≥150 days after dose 2 was 60% against Delta infection and 62% against Omicron, with wide CIs that included zero. Among 186 vaccinated participants with Omicron infections (174 [93%] in children aged 5–11 years and 13 [7%] in adolescents aged 12–15 years), 37.6% were asymptomatic; those reporting COVID-19 symptoms spent 1.4 days in bed, which was 0.6 days fewer than reported for unvaccinated participants (95% CI = –1.1 to –0.1) (Table 2), after adjusting for the propensity to be vaccinated. Conversely, vaccinated participants with Omicron infections stayed home from school 26.2 hours, an adjusted mean of 11 hours more than that reported for unvaccinated participants (95% CI = 4.6–17.6). Overall, medical care–seeking was reported for 16.4% of unvaccinated participants with Omicron infections and 15.5% of vaccinated participants, which was not significantly different. Discussion In this prospective cohort study of children and adolescents aged 5–15 years that included routine weekly SARS-CoV-2 testing, irrespective of symptoms, 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were effective in preventing symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, although effectiveness varied by variant. VE point estimates were highest against Delta variant infections among adolescents aged 12–15 years and lowest against Omicron variant infections among children aged 5–11 years. The SARS-CoV-2 infections prevented by vaccination differed by variant. Approximately one half (51%) of all Omicron infections were asymptomatic compared with approximately one third (34%) of Delta infections. However, when children or adolescents experienced symptomatic COVID-19, the illnesses disrupted life at home and school; on average COVID-19 lasted 7 days, two of which were spent sick in bed, and resulted in 24 hours of missed school. Two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine received <5 months earlier were moderately effective (31%) in preventing symptomatic and asymptomatic Omicron infection among children aged 5–11 years and 59% effective among adolescents aged 12–15 years. The wide and overlapping CIs indicate that these age-specific VE point estimates might not be significantly different and are similar to a recent report of VE of 45%–51% for 2 doses, received within 150 days, against Omicron COVID-19–associated emergency department and urgent care visits among children and adolescents aged 5–15 years ( 7 ). Participants who were infected with Omicron despite receipt of 2 vaccine doses spent an average of one half day less sick in bed than did unvaccinated participants with Omicron infections. Also, similar to studies of children ( 7 ) and adults ( 6 ), among adolescents aged 12–15 years, point estimates for VE of 2 doses received within the previous 150 days were lower against Omicron than Delta infections, although these differences were not statistically significant. The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, despite the use of robust adjusted models previously applied in other cohort studies ( 8 ), VE estimates might have been biased by residual confounding due to other differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants. For example, vaccinated participants reported wearing face masks significantly more often at school and in the community than did unvaccinated participants. Second, although PROTECT is among the largest studies with routine weekly SARS-CoV-2 testing, the relatively small number of infections within vaccination categories among certain age groups reduced precision of VE estimates. Estimates of VE at ≥150 days after dose 2 had very wide CIs, and thus it is unclear whether VE wanes with increased time since vaccination. Third, data were not available to assess possible reasons that vaccinated participants with COVID-19 might have missed more school than did unvaccinated participants despite unvaccinated participants reporting more days sick in bed. Fourth, these interim estimates do not include separate analyses of VE against asymptomatic infection and symptomatic infection at this time. Finally, although this study was conducted in multiple sites and included more than 1,300 participants, findings from the study sample might not be generalizable to all populations. This study provides evidence that receipt of 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is effective in preventing both asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron variant among children and adolescents aged 5–15 years. All eligible children and adolescents should remain up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccinations. Summary What is already known about this topic? Receipt of 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine has been shown to be effective in preventing infection with the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant in persons aged ≥12 years. What is added by this report? Children and adolescents aged 5–15 years were tested for SARS-CoV-2 weekly, irrespective of symptoms, during July 2021–February 2022. Approximately one half of Omicron infections in unvaccinated children and adolescents were asymptomatic. Two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reduced the risk of Omicron infection by 31% among children aged 5–11 years and by 59% among persons aged 12–15 years. What are the implications for public health practice? All eligible children and adolescents should remain up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccinations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Adolescents

          Background Until very recently, vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had not been authorized for emergency use in persons younger than 16 years of age. Safe, effective vaccines are needed to protect this population, facilitate in-person learning and socialization, and contribute to herd immunity. Methods In this ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial, we randomly assigned participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive two injections, 21 days apart, of 30 μg of BNT162b2 or placebo. Noninferiority of the immune response to BNT162b2 in 12-to-15-year-old participants as compared with that in 16-to-25-year-old participants was an immunogenicity objective. Safety (reactogenicity and adverse events) and efficacy against confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19; onset, ≥7 days after dose 2) in the 12-to-15-year-old cohort were assessed. Results Overall, 2260 adolescents 12 to 15 years of age received injections; 1131 received BNT162b2, and 1129 received placebo. As has been found in other age groups, BNT162b2 had a favorable safety and side-effect profile, with mainly transient mild-to-moderate reactogenicity (predominantly injection-site pain [in 79 to 86% of participants], fatigue [in 60 to 66%], and headache [in 55 to 65%]); there were no vaccine-related serious adverse events and few overall severe adverse events. The geometric mean ratio of SARS-CoV-2 50% neutralizing titers after dose 2 in 12-to-15-year-old participants relative to 16-to-25-year-old participants was 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47 to 2.10), which met the noninferiority criterion of a lower boundary of the two-sided 95% confidence interval greater than 0.67 and indicated a greater response in the 12-to-15-year-old cohort. Among participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, no Covid-19 cases with an onset of 7 or more days after dose 2 were noted among BNT162b2 recipients, and 16 cases occurred among placebo recipients. The observed vaccine efficacy was 100% (95% CI, 75.3 to 100). Conclusions The BNT162b2 vaccine in 12-to-15-year-old recipients had a favorable safety profile, produced a greater immune response than in young adults, and was highly effective against Covid-19. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; C4591001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728 .)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Interim Estimates of Vaccine Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Personnel, First Responders, and Other Essential and Frontline Workers — Eight U.S. Locations, December 2020–March 2021

            Messenger RNA (mRNA) BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to be effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 in randomized placebo-controlled Phase III trials ( 1 , 2 ); however, the benefits of these vaccines for preventing asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection, particularly when administered in real-world conditions, is less well understood. Using prospective cohorts of health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers* in eight U.S. locations during December 14, 2020–March 13, 2021, CDC routinely tested for SARS-CoV-2 infections every week regardless of symptom status and at the onset of symptoms consistent with COVID-19–associated illness. Among 3,950 participants with no previous laboratory documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 2,479 (62.8%) received both recommended mRNA doses and 477 (12.1%) received only one dose of mRNA vaccine. † Among unvaccinated participants, 1.38 SARS-CoV-2 infections were confirmed by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) per 1,000 person-days. § In contrast, among fully immunized (≥14 days after second dose) persons, 0.04 infections per 1,000 person-days were reported, and among partially immunized (≥14 days after first dose and before second dose) persons, 0.19 infections per 1,000 person-days were reported. Estimated mRNA vaccine effectiveness for prevention of infection, adjusted for study site, was 90% for full immunization and 80% for partial immunization. These findings indicate that authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of symptom status, among working-age adults in real-world conditions. COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all eligible persons. HEROES-RECOVER ¶ is a network of longitudinal cohorts in eight locations (Phoenix, Tucson, and other areas in Arizona; Miami, Florida; Duluth, Minnesota; Portland, Oregon; Temple, Texas; and Salt Lake City, Utah) that share a common protocol and methods.** Enrollment in this longitudinal study started in July 2020 and included health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers who provided written consent. The current vaccine effectiveness analytic study period began on the first day of vaccine administration at study sites (December 14–18, 2020) and ended March 13, 2021. Active surveillance for symptoms consistent with COVID-19–associated illness (defined as fever, chills, cough, shortness of breath, sore throat, diarrhea, muscle aches, or loss of smell or taste) occurred through weekly text messages, e-mails, and direct participant or medical record reports. Participants self-collected a midturbinate nasal swab weekly, regardless of COVID-19–associated illness symptom status and collected an additional nasal swab and saliva specimen at the onset of COVID-19–associated illness. Specimens shipped on cold packs were tested by RT-PCR assay at Marshfield Clinic Laboratory (Marshfield, Wisconsin) to determine SARS-CoV-2 infections (PCR-confirmed infection). Receipt of COVID-19 vaccines was documented by multiple methods: by self-report in electronic surveys, by telephone interviews, and through direct upload of vaccine card images at all sites; records were also extracted from electronic medical records at the Minnesota, Oregon, Texas, and Utah sites. Among 5,077 participants, those with laboratory documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection before enrollment starting in July 2020 (608) or identified as part of longitudinal surveillance up until the first day of vaccine administration (240) were excluded. Another 279 were excluded because of low participation (i.e., failed to complete surveillance for ≥20% of study weeks and did not contribute COVID-19–associated illness specimens). Overall, 3,950 participants in the vaccine effectiveness analytic sample were analyzed. Hazard ratios were estimated by the Andersen-Gill extension of the Cox proportional hazards model, which accounted for time-varying vaccination status. Hazard ratios of unvaccinated person-days to partial immunization person-days (≥14 days after first dose and before second dose) and to full immunization person-days (≥14 days after second dose) were calculated separately. The 13 person-days between vaccine administration and partial or full immunization were considered excluded at-risk person-time because immunity was considered to be indeterminate. Unadjusted vaccine effectiveness was calculated as 100% × (1−hazard ratio). An adjusted vaccine effectiveness model included study site as a covariate. All analyses were conducted with SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute). This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy. †† Approximately one half of the participants (52.6%) were from the Arizona study sites (Table 1). Participants included physicians and other clinical leads (primary health care personnel) (21.1%), nurses and other allied health care personnel (33.8%), first responders (21.6%), and other essential and frontline workers (23.5%). The majority of participants were female (62.1%), aged 18–49 years (71.9%), White (86.3%), and non-Hispanic (82.9%) and had no chronic medical conditions (68.9%). Over the 13-week study period, adherence to weekly surveillance reporting and specimen collection was high (median = 100%; interquartile range = 82%–100%). TABLE 1 Characteristics of health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers with reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)–confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and percentage receiving one or more doses of a messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine — eight U.S. locations, December 14, 2020–March 13, 2021 Characteristic No. (column %) of participants SARS-CoV-2 infection Unvaccinated Vaccinated with ≥1 dose* No. (row %) p-value† No. (row %) No. (row %) p-value† Total 3,950 (100) 205 (5.2) — 989 (25.0) 2,961 (75.0) — Cohort location Phoenix, Arizona 555 (14.1) 39 (7.0§) 14 days after first dose) of 60% (95% CI = 38%–74%) against PCR-confirmed infection identified by records review in Israel ( 5 ). This finding is also consistent with early descriptive findings of SARS-CoV-2 employee and clinical testing results by mRNA vaccination status in the United States ( 8 , 9 ). The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, vaccine effectiveness point estimates should be interpreted with caution given the moderately wide CIs attributable in part to the limited number of postimmunization PCR-confirmed infections observed. Second, this also precluded making product-specific vaccine effectiveness estimates and limited the ability to adjust for potential confounders; however, effects were largely unchanged when study site was included in an adjusted vaccine effectiveness model and when adjusted for sex, age, ethnicity, and occupation separately in sensitivity analyses. Finally, self-collection of specimens and delays in shipments could reduce sensitivity of virus detection by PCR ( 10 ); if this disproportionately affected those who received the vaccine (e.g., because of possible vaccine attenuation of virus shedding), vaccine effectiveness would be overestimated. The scientific rigor of these findings is enhanced by its prospective design and the participants’ very high adherence to weekly specimen collection. As the study progresses, viruses will be genetically characterized to examine the viral features of breakthrough infections. Given that there is uncertainty related to the number of days required to develop immunity postvaccination ( 3 – 5 , 7 ), future research examining vaccine effectiveness at different intervals is warranted. These interim vaccine effectiveness findings for both Pfizer-BioNTech’s and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines in real-world conditions complement and expand upon the vaccine effectiveness estimates from other recent studies ( 3 – 5 ) and demonstrate that current vaccination efforts are resulting in substantial preventive benefits among working-age adults. They reinforce CDC’s recommendation of full 2-dose immunization with mRNA vaccines. COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all eligible persons, which currently varies by location in the United States. Summary What is already known about this topic? Messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to be effective in preventing symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in randomized placebo-controlled Phase III trials. What is added by this report? Prospective cohorts of 3,950 health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers completed weekly SARS-CoV-2 testing for 13 consecutive weeks. Under real-world conditions, mRNA vaccine effectiveness of full immunization (≥14 days after second dose) was 90% against SARS-CoV-2 infections regardless of symptom status; vaccine effectiveness of partial immunization (≥14 days after first dose but before second dose) was 80%. What are the implications for public health practice? Authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in real-world conditions. COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all eligible persons.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluation of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Children 5 to 11 Years of Age

              Background Safe, effective vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) are urgently needed in children younger than 12 years of age. Methods A phase 1, dose-finding study and an ongoing phase 2–3 randomized trial are being conducted to investigate the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine administered 21 days apart in children 6 months to 11 years of age. We present results for 5-to-11-year-old children. In the phase 2–3 trial, participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive two doses of either the BNT162b2 vaccine at the dose level identified during the open-label phase 1 study or placebo. Immune responses 1 month after the second dose of BNT162b2 were immunologically bridged to those in 16-to-25-year-olds from the pivotal trial of two 30-μg doses of BNT162b2. Vaccine efficacy against Covid-19 at 7 days or more after the second dose was assessed. Results During the phase 1 study, a total of 48 children 5 to 11 years of age received 10 μg, 20 μg, or 30 μg of the BNT162b2 vaccine (16 children at each dose level). On the basis of reactogenicity and immunogenicity, a dose level of 10 μg was selected for further study. In the phase 2–3 trial, a total of 2268 children were randomly assigned to receive the BNT162b2 vaccine (1517 children) or placebo (751 children). At data cutoff, the median follow-up was 2.3 months. In the 5-to-11-year-olds, as in other age groups, the BNT162b2 vaccine had a favorable safety profile. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were noted. One month after the second dose, the geometric mean ratio of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) neutralizing titers in 5-to-11-year-olds to those in 16-to-25-year-olds was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.18), a ratio meeting the prespecified immunogenicity success criterion (lower bound of two-sided 95% CI, >0.67; geometric mean ratio point estimate, ≥0.8). Covid-19 with onset 7 days or more after the second dose was reported in three recipients of the BNT162b2 vaccine and in 16 placebo recipients (vaccine efficacy, 90.7%; 95% CI, 67.7 to 98.3). Conclusions A Covid-19 vaccination regimen consisting of two 10-μg doses of BNT162b2 administered 21 days apart was found to be safe, immunogenic, and efficacious in children 5 to 11 years of age. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04816643 .)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                18 March 2022
                18 March 2022
                : 71
                : 11
                : 422-428
                Affiliations
                CDC COVID-19 Emergency Response Team; Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah; College of Medicine - Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; Abt Associates, Rockville, Maryland; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Baylor Scott & White Health, Texas, Temple, Texas; St. Luke’s Regional Health Care System, Duluth, Minnesota; Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon; Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Ashley L. Fowlkes, ahl4@ 123456cdc.gov .
                Article
                mm7111e1
                10.15585/mmwr.mm7111e1
                8942308
                35298453
                fe7365e2-9eb0-4af0-b2e5-588dd477c633

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article