92
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An Insight into Z-Drug Abuse and Dependence: An Examination of Reports to the European Medicines Agency Database of Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although originally marketed as safe alternatives to the habit-forming benzodiazepines, growing numbers of zaleplon, zolpidem, and zopiclone (“Z-drugs”) clinical concerns relating to their potential of abuse, dependence, and withdrawal have been reported over time. We aimed here at assessing these issues analyzing datasets of adverse drug reactions provided by the European Medicines Agency through the EudraVigilance system.

          Methods

          Analyzing the adverse drug reactions databases of each Z-drug, descriptive analyses have been performed on cases and proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) computed.

          Results

          An overall number of 33 240 (e.g., 23 420 zolpidem; 9283 zopiclone; and 537 zaleplon) misuse-, abuse-, dependence-, and withdrawal-related adverse drug reactions, corresponding to some 6246 unique patients given Z-drugs, were here identified. Cases were studied and described, including demographic characteristics and clinical data such as concomitant drugs, doses, routes of administration, and outcomes of the reactions (being fatalities recorded). Considering PRR values and in comparison with zopiclone, zolpidem was more frequently involved in both misuse/abuse and withdrawal issues. Zolpidem and zopiclone presented with the same dependence risk, but zopiclone was most involved in overdose adverse drug reactions. Compared with zaleplon, zopiclone presented higher dependence and overdose-related issues but slightly lower misuse/abuse and withdrawal PRR values.

          Conclusion

          Current data may only represent a gross underestimate of the real prevalence of Z-drug misuse. Caution should be exercised when prescribing those molecules, especially for patients with psychiatric illnesses and/or history of drug abuse. We recommend the need to invest in proactive pharmacovigilance activities to better and promptly detect, understand, and prevent any possible misuse potential of prescribed medications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Drugs for Insomnia beyond Benzodiazepines: Pharmacology, Clinical Applications, and Discovery

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Deprescribing benzodiazepine receptor agonists: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

            To develop an evidence-based guideline to help clinicians make decisions about when and how to safely taper and stop benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs); to focus on the highest level of evidence available and seek input from primary care professionals in the guideline development, review, and endorsement processes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Abuse and dependence potential for the non-benzodiazepine hypnotics zolpidem and zopiclone: a review of case reports and epidemiological data.

              The non-benzodiazepine hypnotics zolpidem and zopiclone, which are indicated for short-term treatment of insomnia, were considered originally by physicians as almost devoid of abuse and dependence potential. Several recent publications, however, have suggested that both agents carry a significant risk of abuse. To substantiate and re-evaluate this situation, the world literature was reviewed for cases of dependence of both agents; these cases were analysed in order to identify certain underlying patterns, if evident. A systematic review based on a Medline literature search was conducted including the years 1966-2002 to assemble all available clinical case reports that were analysed for typical features of abuse and dependence according to prespecified criteria. Only case reports were of interest, and clinical studies were excluded. No limitations as to language or publication year were applied. The terms 'zolpidem', 'zopiclone' and 'abuse', 'dependence', 'addiction', 'withdrawal' and 'intoxication' were used to identify relevant publications. Potentially relevant citations were retrieved and assessed for inclusion independently by two authors. A total of 36 cases for zolpidem were identified, most of them reported in recent years, and 22 cases for zopiclone. Both sexes were involved to a similar extent; and cases were reported in all age groups. In extreme cases, dose increases reached a factor of 30-120 above the recommended doses. The majority of patients had a history of former drug or alcohol abuse and/or other psychiatric conditions. On the basis of world-wide prescription numbers, which are approximately twofold higher for zolpidem (1,338,774,000 tablets from June 2001 to June 2002 in Europe, Japan and United States) than for zopiclone (664,897,000 tablets during the same period in Europe and Japan), the relative incidence of reported dependence similar for both drugs and remarkably lower than that of benzodiazepines used for the treatment of disturbed sleep. The findings offer the conclusion that zolpidem and zopiclone are relatively safe drugs. However, as both drugs are psychotropic drugs, patients with a history of abuse or dependence and those with psychiatric diseases seem to be at increased risk of abuse of these agents.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Neuropsychopharmacol
                Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol
                ijnp
                International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1461-1457
                1469-5111
                April 2019
                05 February 2019
                05 February 2019
                : 22
                : 4
                : 270-277
                Affiliations
                Psychopharmacology, Drug Misuse and Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Stefania Chiappini, MD, Psychopharmacology, Drug Misuse and Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK ( stefaniachiappini9@ 123456gmail.com ).
                Article
                pyz007
                10.1093/ijnp/pyz007
                6441128
                30722037
                fe0f12fd-e7b5-4817-9d38-09a9806f360b
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 16 October 2018
                : 14 January 2019
                : 29 January 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: EMA 10.13039/501100001447
                Categories
                Regular Research Articles

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                adverse drug reactions,z-drugs,zolpidem,zaleplon,zopiclone,ema
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                adverse drug reactions, z-drugs, zolpidem, zaleplon, zopiclone, ema

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                140
                3
                98
                0
                Smart Citations
                140
                3
                98
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content89

                Cited by64

                Most referenced authors270