1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Needle Aspiration of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax

      1 , 1 , 1
      New England Journal of Medicine
      New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM/MMS)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A randomized controlled trial comparing minichest tube and needle aspiration in outpatient management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax.

            The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and complications associated with needle aspiration (NA) and minichest tube (MCT) insertion with Heimlich valve attachment in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax at an emergency department (ED).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Management of emergency department patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax: needle aspiration or tube thoracostomy?

              The emergency management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax is controversial. This evidence-based emergency medicine review evaluates the existing evidence about the efficacy and safety of needle aspiration in comparison to tube thoracostomy for management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and other databases. We selected studies for inclusion in the review if the authors stated that they had randomly assigned hemodynamically stable patients with no underlying lung disease to needle aspiration or tube thoracostomy. The outcome measures of interest included admission rate, length of hospital stay, recurrence rate, failure rate of the procedure, dyspnea score during or after the procedure, pain score during or after the procedure, and complications. Three randomized trials with acceptable quality standards met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference between needle aspiration and tube thoracostomy when outcomes of immediate failure, 1-week failure, risk of complication, and 1-year recurrence rate were measured. Only 2 trials reported the rate of hospitalization; needle aspiration was associated with lower rates of hospitalization in both trials: relative risks of 0.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17 to 0.39) and 0.51 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.74). Length of hospital stay was lower in the needle aspiration groups in all 3 trials, with mean differences of -2.15 days (95% CI -0.99 to -3.30), -2.10 days (95% CI -0.57 to -3.63), and -1.10 days (95% CI -2.28 to 0.08), respectively. Needle aspiration was associated with less analgesia requirement in one trial and lower pain scores in another. The existing evidence indicates that needle aspiration is at least as safe and effective as tube thoracostomy for management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Additionally, needle aspiration carries the benefit of fewer hospital admissions and shorter length of hospital stay.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                New England Journal of Medicine
                N Engl J Med
                New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM/MMS)
                0028-4793
                1533-4406
                May 09 2013
                May 09 2013
                : 368
                : 19
                : e24
                Affiliations
                [1 ]From the University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
                Article
                10.1056/NEJMvcm1111468
                fe0c37c5-c1dc-4519-a1d6-82b68a71521f
                © 2013
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article