54
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A combined community- and facility-based approach to improve pregnancy outcomes in low-resource settings: a Global Network cluster randomized trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Fetal and neonatal mortality rates in low-income countries are at least 10-fold greater than in high-income countries. These differences have been related to poor access to and poor quality of obstetric and neonatal care.

          Methods

          This trial tested the hypothesis that teams of health care providers, administrators and local residents can address the problem of limited access to quality obstetric and neonatal care and lead to a reduction in perinatal mortality in intervention compared to control locations. In seven geographic areas in five low-income and one middle-income country, most with high perinatal mortality rates and substantial numbers of home deliveries, we performed a cluster randomized non-masked trial of a package of interventions that included community mobilization focusing on birth planning and hospital transport, community birth attendant training in problem recognition, and facility staff training in the management of obstetric and neonatal emergencies. The primary outcome was perinatal mortality at ≥28 weeks gestation or birth weight ≥1000 g.

          Results

          Despite extensive effort in all sites in each of the three intervention areas, no differences emerged in the primary or any secondary outcome between the intervention and control clusters. In both groups, the mean perinatal mortality was 40.1/1,000 births ( P = 0.9996). Neither were there differences between the two groups in outcomes in the last six months of the project, in the year following intervention cessation, nor in the clusters that best implemented the intervention.

          Conclusions

          This cluster randomized comprehensive, large-scale, multi-sector intervention did not result in detectable impact on the proposed outcomes. While this does not negate the importance of these interventions, we expect that achieving improvement in pregnancy outcomes in these settings will require substantially more obstetric and neonatal care infrastructure than was available at the sites during this trial, and without them provider training and community mobilization will not be sufficient. Our results highlight the critical importance of evaluating outcomes in randomized trials, as interventions that should be effective may not be.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01073488

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works.

          The concept of knowing what works in terms of reducing maternal mortality is complicated by a huge diversity of country contexts and of determinants of maternal health. Here we aim to show that, despite this complexity, only a few strategic choices need to be made to reduce maternal mortality. We begin by presenting the logic that informs our strategic choices. This logic suggests that implementation of an effective intrapartum-care strategy is an overwhelming priority. We also discuss the alternative configurations of such a strategy and, using the best available evidence, prioritise one strategy based on delivery in primary-level institutions (health centres), backed up by access to referral-level facilities. We then go on to discuss strategies that complement intrapartum care. We conclude by discussing the inexplicable hesitation in decision-making after nearly 20 years of safe motherhood programming: if the fifth Millennium Development Goal is to be achieved, then what needs to be prioritised is obvious. Further delays in getting on with what works begs questions about the commitment of decision-makers to this goal.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery service use

            Background Skilled attendance at childbirth is crucial for decreasing maternal and neonatal mortality, yet many women in low- and middle-income countries deliver outside of health facilities, without skilled help. The main conceptual framework in this field implicitly looks at home births with complications. We expand this to include "preventive" facility delivery for uncomplicated childbirth, and review the kinds of determinants studied in the literature, their hypothesized mechanisms of action and the typical findings, as well as methodological difficulties encountered. Methods We searched PubMed and Ovid databases for reviews and ascertained relevant articles from these and other sources. Twenty determinants identified were grouped under four themes: (1) sociocultural factors, (2) perceived benefit/need of skilled attendance, (3) economic accessibility and (4) physical accessibility. Results There is ample evidence that higher maternal age, education and household wealth and lower parity increase use, as does urban residence. Facility use in the previous delivery and antenatal care use are also highly predictive of health facility use for the index delivery, though this may be due to confounding by service availability and other factors. Obstetric complications also increase use but are rarely studied. Quality of care is judged to be essential in qualitative studies but is not easily measured in surveys, or without linking facility records with women. Distance to health facilities decreases use, but is also difficult to determine. Challenges in comparing results between studies include differences in methods, context-specificity and the substantial overlap between complex variables. Conclusion Studies of the determinants of skilled attendance concentrate on sociocultural and economic accessibility variables and neglect variables of perceived benefit/need and physical accessibility. To draw valid conclusions, it is important to consider as many influential factors as possible in any analysis of delivery service use. The increasing availability of georeferenced data provides the opportunity to link health facility data with large-scale household data, enabling researchers to explore the influences of distance and service quality.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why.

              The risk of a woman dying as a result of pregnancy or childbirth during her lifetime is about one in six in the poorest parts of the world compared with about one in 30 000 in Northern Europe. Such a discrepancy poses a huge challenge to meeting the fifth Millennium Development Goal to reduce maternal mortality by 75% between 1990 and 2015. Some developed and transitional countries have managed to reduce their maternal mortality during the past 25 years. Few of these, however, began with the very high rates that are now estimated for the poorest countries-in which further progress is jeopardised by weak health systems, continuing high fertility, and poor availability of data. Maternal deaths are clustered around labour, delivery, and the immediate postpartum period, with obstetric haemorrhage being the main medical cause of death. Local variation can be important, with unsafe abortion carrying huge risk in some populations, and HIV/AIDS becoming a leading cause of death where HIV-related mortaliy rates are high. Inequalities in the risk of maternal death exist everywhere. Targeting of interventions to the most vulnerable--rural populations and poor people--is essential if substantial progress is to be achieved by 2015.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                BMC Med
                BMC Med
                BMC Medicine
                BioMed Central
                1741-7015
                2013
                3 October 2013
                : 11
                : 215
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
                [2 ]Department of Social, Statistical and Environmental Sciences, Research Triangle Institute, Durham, NC, USA
                [3 ]Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA
                [4 ]KLE University’s Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, India
                [5 ]Department of Pediatrics, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
                [6 ]Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, India
                [7 ]Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya
                [8 ]Francisco Marroquin University, Guatemala City, Guatemala
                [9 ]Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [10 ]Centre for Infectious Disease Research Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
                [11 ]University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
                [12 ]Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE, USA
                [13 ]Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA
                [14 ]Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
                [15 ]University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
                [16 ]School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
                [17 ]Research Triangle Institute, Durham, NC, USA
                [18 ]University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
                [19 ]American College of Nurse Midwives, Washington, DC, USA
                [20 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
                Author notes
                On Behalf of the EMONC Trial Investigators
                Article
                1741-7015-11-215
                10.1186/1741-7015-11-215
                3853358
                24090370
                fe092fad-f00c-498b-955f-ce8ba0c20a59
                Copyright © 2013 Pasha et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 April 2013
                : 16 September 2013
                Categories
                Research Article

                Medicine
                stillbirth,neonatal mortality,maternal mortality,emergency obstetric care
                Medicine
                stillbirth, neonatal mortality, maternal mortality, emergency obstetric care

                Comments

                Comment on this article