32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dynamic induction of the myelin‐associated growth inhibitor Nogo‐A in perilesional plasticity regions after human spinal cord injury

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The myelin‐associated inhibitor Nogo‐A (Reticulon 4, RTN4) restricts axonal outgrowth, plasticity, and neural circuitry formation in experimental models of spinal cord injury (SCI) and is targeted in clinical interventions starting treatment within 4 weeks post‐SCI. Specifically, Nogo‐A expressed by oligodendroglia restricts compensatory neurite sprouting. To interrogate the hypothesis of an inducible, lesion reactive Nogo‐A expression over time, we analyzed the spatiotemporal Nogo‐A expression at the spinal lesion core (region of tissue necrosis and axonal damage/pruning) and perilesional rim (region of plasticity formation). Spinal cord specimens of SCI subjects ( n = 22) were compared to neuropathologically unaltered controls ( n = 9). Nogo‐A expression was investigated ranging from acute (0–3 days), early subacute (4–21 days), late subacute (22–90 days) to early chronic–chronic (91 days to 1.5 years after SCI) stages after SCI. Nogo‐A expression in controls is confined to motoneurons in the anterior horn and to oligodendrocytes in gray and white matter. After SCI, the number of Nogo‐A + and TPPP/p25 + oligodendrocytes (i) inclined at the organizing perilesional rim specifically, (ii) increased further over time, and (iii) peaked at chronic stages after SCI. By contrast, at the lesion core, the number of Nogo‐A + and TPPP/p25 + oligodendrocytes did not increase. Increasing numbers of Nogo‐A + oligodendrocytes coincided with oligodendrogenesis corroborated by Nogo‐A coexpression of Ki67 +, TPPP/p25 + proliferating oligodendrocytes. Nogo‐A oligodendrocyte expression emerges at perilesional (plasticity) regions over time and suggests an extended therapeutical window for anti‐Nogo‐A pathway targeting interventions beyond 4 weeks in patients after SCI.

          Abstract

          Nogo‐A oligodendrocytes expression emerges at perilesional regions over time and suggests an extended therapeutical window for anti‐Nogo‐A pathway trageting interventrions beyond four weeks in patients after spinal cord injury.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Traumatic spinal cord injury

          Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) has devastating consequences for the physical, social and vocational well-being of patients. The demographic of SCIs is shifting such that an increasing proportion of older individuals are being affected. Pathophysiologically, the initial mechanical trauma (the primary injury) permeabilizes neurons and glia and initiates a secondary injury cascade that leads to progressive cell death and spinal cord damage over the subsequent weeks. Over time, the lesion remodels and is composed of cystic cavitations and a glial scar, both of which potently inhibit regeneration. Several animal models and complementary behavioural tests of SCI have been developed to mimic this pathological process and form the basis for the development of preclinical and translational neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies. Diagnosis requires a thorough patient history, standardized neurological physical examination and radiographic imaging of the spinal cord. Following diagnosis, several interventions need to be rapidly applied, including haemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit, early surgical decompression, blood pressure augmentation and, potentially, the administration of methylprednisolone. Managing the complications of SCI, such as bowel and bladder dysfunction, the formation of pressure sores and infections, is key to address all facets of the patient's injury experience.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

            Summary Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) are increasingly recognised as global health priorities in view of the preventability of most injuries and the complex and expensive medical care they necessitate. We aimed to measure the incidence, prevalence, and years of life lived with disability (YLDs) for TBI and SCI from all causes of injury in every country, to describe how these measures have changed between 1990 and 2016, and to estimate the proportion of TBI and SCI cases caused by different types of injury. Methods We used results from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) Study 2016 to measure the global, regional, and national burden of TBI and SCI by age and sex. We measured the incidence and prevalence of all causes of injury requiring medical care in inpatient and outpatient records, literature studies, and survey data. By use of clinical record data, we estimated the proportion of each cause of injury that required medical care that would result in TBI or SCI being considered as the nature of injury. We used literature studies to establish standardised mortality ratios and applied differential equations to convert incidence to prevalence of long-term disability. Finally, we applied GBD disability weights to calculate YLDs. We used a Bayesian meta-regression tool for epidemiological modelling, used cause-specific mortality rates for non-fatal estimation, and adjusted our results for disability experienced with comorbid conditions. We also analysed results on the basis of the Socio-demographic Index, a compound measure of income per capita, education, and fertility. Findings In 2016, there were 27·08 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 24·30–30·30 million) new cases of TBI and 0·93 million (0·78–1·16 million) new cases of SCI, with age-standardised incidence rates of 369 (331–412) per 100 000 population for TBI and 13 (11–16) per 100 000 for SCI. In 2016, the number of prevalent cases of TBI was 55·50 million (53·40–57·62 million) and of SCI was 27·04 million (24·98–30·15 million). From 1990 to 2016, the age-standardised prevalence of TBI increased by 8·4% (95% UI 7·7 to 9·2), whereas that of SCI did not change significantly (−0·2% [–2·1 to 2·7]). Age-standardised incidence rates increased by 3·6% (1·8 to 5·5) for TBI, but did not change significantly for SCI (−3·6% [–7·4 to 4·0]). TBI caused 8·1 million (95% UI 6·0–10·4 million) YLDs and SCI caused 9·5 million (6·7–12·4 million) YLDs in 2016, corresponding to age-standardised rates of 111 (82–141) per 100 000 for TBI and 130 (90–170) per 100 000 for SCI. Falls and road injuries were the leading causes of new cases of TBI and SCI in most regions. Interpretation TBI and SCI constitute a considerable portion of the global injury burden and are caused primarily by falls and road injuries. The increase in incidence of TBI over time might continue in view of increases in population density, population ageing, and increasing use of motor vehicles, motorcycles, and bicycles. The number of individuals living with SCI is expected to increase in view of population growth, which is concerning because of the specialised care that people with SCI can require. Our study was limited by data sparsity in some regions, and it will be important to invest greater resources in collection of data for TBI and SCI to improve the accuracy of future assessments. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Biology of Regeneration Failure and Success After Spinal Cord Injury.

              Since no approved therapies to restore mobility and sensation following spinal cord injury (SCI) currently exist, a better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms following SCI that compromise regeneration or neuroplasticity is needed to develop new strategies to promote axonal regrowth and restore function. Physical trauma to the spinal cord results in vascular disruption that, in turn, causes blood-spinal cord barrier rupture leading to hemorrhage and ischemia, followed by rampant local cell death. As subsequent edema and inflammation occur, neuronal and glial necrosis and apoptosis spread well beyond the initial site of impact, ultimately resolving into a cavity surrounded by glial/fibrotic scarring. The glial scar, which stabilizes the spread of secondary injury, also acts as a chronic, physical, and chemo-entrapping barrier that prevents axonal regeneration. Understanding the formative events in glial scarring helps guide strategies towards the development of potential therapies to enhance axon regeneration and functional recovery at both acute and chronic stages following SCI. This review will also discuss the perineuronal net and how chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) deposited in both the glial scar and net impede axonal outgrowth at the level of the growth cone. We will end the review with a summary of current CSPG-targeting strategies that help to foster axonal regeneration, neuroplasticity/sprouting, and functional recovery following SCI.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jan.schwab@osumc.edu
                romana.hoeftberger@meduniwien.ac.at
                Journal
                Brain Pathol
                Brain Pathol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1750-3639
                BPA
                Brain Pathology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1015-6305
                1750-3639
                13 June 2022
                January 2023
                : 33
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/bpa.v33.1 )
                : e13098
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 2 ] Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 3 ] Department of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 4 ] Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Medical University of Vienna (Affiliated Partner of the ERN EpiCARE) Vienna Austria
                [ 5 ] Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 6 ] The Belford Center for Spinal Cord Injury and Departments of Neurology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurosciences The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jan M. Schwab, The Belford Center for Spinal Cord Injury and Departments of Neurology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurosciences, The Ohio State University, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

                Email: jan.schwab@ 123456osumc.edu

                Romana Höftberger, Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

                Email: romana.hoeftberger@ 123456meduniwien.ac.at

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4029-1733
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8909-1591
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6153-9291
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6784-4919
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5769-1100
                Article
                BPA13098
                10.1111/bpa.13098
                9836369
                35698271
                fe065d0d-cb7e-4746-914b-0b44c85950e8
                © 2022 The Authors. Brain Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Neuropathology.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 October 2021
                : 29 May 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 13, Words: 7418
                Funding
                Funded by: Austrian Science Fund , doi 10.13039/501100002428;
                Award ID: I 3334‐B27
                Funded by: Craig H. Neilsen Foundation , doi 10.13039/100005191;
                Award ID: CHNF#596764
                Funded by: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft‐ und Raumfahrt
                Award ID: SCI‐Net #01EW1710
                Award ID: SILENCE #01EW170A
                Funded by: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke , doi 10.13039/100000065;
                Award ID: R01NS118200
                Funded by: National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research , doi 10.13039/100009157;
                Award ID: NIDILRR #90SI5020
                Funded by: Wings for Life , doi 10.13039/100012066;
                Award ID: DE‐16/16
                Award ID: DE‐047/14
                Funded by: Medical University of Vienna , doi 10.13039/501100005788;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.3 mode:remove_FC converted:12.01.2023

                Pathology
                Pathology

                Comments

                Comment on this article