0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Computational modeling of hemodynamics and risk of thrombosis in the left atrial appendage using patient-specific blood viscosity and boundary conditions at the mitral valve.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Hemodynamics play a vital role for the risk of thrombosis in the left atrial appendage (LAA) and left atrium (LA) for patients with atrial fibrillation. Accurate prediction of hemodynamics in the LA can provide important guidance for assessing the risk of thrombosis in the LAA. Patient specificity is a crucial factor in representing the true hemodynamic fields. In this study, we investigated the effects of blood rheology (as a function of hematocrit and shear rate), as well as patient-specific mitral valve (MV) boundary conditions (MV area and velocity profiles measured by ultrasound) on the hemodynamics and thrombosis potential of the LAA. Four scenarios were setup with different degrees of patient specificity. Though using a constant blood viscosity can classify the thrombus and non-thrombus patients for all the hemodynamic indicators, the risk of thrombosis was underestimated for all patients compared with patient-specific viscosities. The results with least patient specificities showed that patients prone to thrombosis predicted by three hemodynamic indicators were inconsistent with clinical observations. Moreover, though patients had the same MV inlet flow rate, different MV models lead to different trends in the risk of thrombosis in different patients. We also found that endothelial cell activation potential and relative residence time can effectively distinguish thrombus and non-thrombus patients for all the scenarios, relatively insensitive to patient specificities. Overall, the findings of this study provide useful insights on patients-specific hemodynamic simulations of the LA.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Biomech Model Mechanobiol
          Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1617-7940
          1617-7940
          Aug 2023
          : 22
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Artificial Organ Technology Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
          [2 ] Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
          [3 ] Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. wumin0011@gdph.org.cn.
          [4 ] Department of Cardiovascular Engineering, Medical Faculty, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
          [5 ] School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
          [6 ] Artificial Organ Technology Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou, China. pwu@suda.edu.cn.
          Article
          10.1007/s10237-023-01731-4
          10.1007/s10237-023-01731-4
          37389735
          fdfbafef-5f95-4530-979c-0d4ea33cf6f3
          History

          Thrombosis,Left atrial appendage,Hemodynamics,Hematocrit,Computational fluid dynamics,Blood rheology

          Comments

          Comment on this article